The Net 7.0
and gnashing teeth, Anne is stunned and tries to grab him, but then he faints, and because he is burdensome for her forces so she almost fall him to the ground. Anne screams in the hallway, do not really need it, because doctors who watched the cameras are on the way to that room. Hugh is rapidly transported to a cocoon of survival.
“...hackers just leave it on the Internet images that show a restricted meeting between Hugh and Anne, and the surprising blackout of Hugh, the images is not good, but you can see perfectly ...”
//connected/border/images/homemade videos/
“... knight versus castle, check...”
//?#410104?$#/ag/sec/c7/black_queen/
“... medical authorities have publicly said there is nothing to worry about, indeed Hugh is having the best possible treatment, soon will be available a medical report with details of why the faint of Hugh, as well as his current health.
- I would still say that everything will be done with the greatest possible transparency. Hugh will be transported today to capital city, and there he will be handled by a large team of experts. I inform you, as a representative of the UN that despite the patient's images become restricted, and no more public exposure, even so... numerous representatives of NGOs, of unquestionable independence, will have unrestricted access to images of these cameras on Hugh, and still others will have real access by going in person to see the treatment that the UN is giving to Hugh. I remember that these images only were restricted to protect the patient...”
//orange/wedges news/today/
“... to me is proof that have skeletons in the closet. The fact that the UN has been so carefulness is a warning sign. I suspect this "openness" that it is giving to some NGOs to oversee the treatment of Hugh. I think it is just a decoy that aims to cover up something. It is sad that we have so many mindless people in these NGOs that lend themselves to this role giving credibility to the supposed "openness" of the UN. But it is quite simple; if they have nothing to hide then they must show all in the web, all at all time and for all. This principle, taught at all time, has no return in our current historical moment, if not able to everyone see then we must understand that is confidential, no more middle ground here. It’s enough of this dirty game with the information. Ask yourself, after all, which means restricting information about Hugh for his own protection? That does not go away. Even for justice, well known bastion of anachronism, this is one more excuse for protecting individual privacy rights versus society's interest. After all, where millions of people are exposed every moment in front of cameras, where millions of people left their homes 24 hours on the Internet, where even the someone’s bathroom is exposed, who may even be surprised with something of the life of another human. What could even be harmful to know of someone's life? ...”
//Journal_economic/theoretical/sentiently-economy/group-A/
“... these cases are always complex, it's no use for simplicity, more simple more wrong. The major complication is that we tend to see the instant. We see the chase, the act, the cat chasing the mouse and thus we can only formulate two opposite sides of the issue. The mouse runs away because the cat chases it. And the second: the cat chases the mouse because it runs away. And it has no solution, it is unending. So there must be some refinement and that is the problem. It is necessary to know the history of the cat and the mouse, the environment, yet all the circumstances surrounding this mouse with this cat, and the options they had to avoid each other, the negatives that hinder the relationship between both. There is nothing easy except our desire for simplicity, but this is a human folly. Everything is mixed at all. The truth always gets lost in a tangle that...”
//history/studies/proposed_work/from-public/
“...always so, I, who dealt with the image of public authorities have to get used to it. There seems to be a true hysteria against the authorities. No matter what we achieved always seems we should have done more. It has to be something from ancient that permeated deep into society. I personally do not think it's bad. Today there are violent radicals, but they are a minority so small that not enough to do significant damage. Most people in the world today have information and critical sense to know that violence leads nowhere. That's why I defend groups of hackers, because I think that even subversive and illegal acts that tend to expose more information is beneficial to society. We are moving increasingly to the full opening of the information, the human living a public life, who will have to open your whole life to the eyes of society, nothing can be hidden, and soon enough, this will be apply to companies and institutions. For these organizations, especially international ones such as the UN, don't be foolish, today they have too much power and in the name of that power try to hide information, like the infamous IIA, international intelligence agency, here I see a big mistake, because in the name of protection against extremist acts, especially violent and terrorists, if...”
//Tarama_corp/the_largest_company/chairman/speeches_given/
“... academically that explains the Hugh's state, the suppression of drug HNR3 actually must have caused the current problem in his brain...”
//geneticists/biochemical/evaluation/independent/
“...therefore, it is God's answer to these heretics, these greedy who wish to usurp the power of creation from God. Clear is the path here. It's just a well-deserved punishment, my brothers, well deserved indeed. Like the Fallen, who dared to want to be like God, like Lucifer who does not accept the superiority of God, behold the punishment, behold the fall. That thing, that Hugh, this creation that offends the natural destiny that God has imposed on us all, for it is written brothers, you are dust and to dust you will return, that we are all born as men and as men will die, so that spurious creation, shameful, offensive to God, falls as Satan and be punished and thrown into the world of darkness and oblivion, and stays there in the shadows...”
//church of the new renewal/pulpit/high preacher/
“...and so, we in our religion understand that the example of Jesus must be followed. Jesus eluded death, Jesus did not die, no question about it for us. We accept as dogma the fact that Jesus did not die. The supreme act of resurrection for us is sacred. So we interpret this as a divine sign, that God wants human beings defeats death, to become immortal ...”
//renovation of the new Christian philosophy/tutors/directors pastors/speeches/
“...regret what happened, because we see no conflict, we just understand that Hugh reincarnated in another body. Hugh is just a reincarnated soul. It could have reincarnated in any other form of life, it's clear, he just reincarnated in the body that now he occupies. If science can one day make us reincarnated in other bodies then it’s okay, even bodies created by genetic, we do not see something wrong here that offends the fundamentals of our religion, we do not see science and technology as the enemy...”
//spiritualism renewed/open letters/
“...Jesus was a nice guy, a great philosopher, a great politician, a great sociologist and especially the largest communitarian ever. On the day that really actualize within our society the communitarianism, this will be thanks to him. "Love your neighbor as you love you" - the chorus is the most poetic communitarian phrase, deeper and truer than anyone has ever issued. And the image of Jesus does not weaken, even now we march towards unification between Eastern and Western culture, the image of Buddha, Siddhartha, Muhammad also did not weaken, but everyone will benefit, mainly because all their philosophy, especially regarding the communitarians aspects, are not at all contradictory, indeed, the similarity is great...”
//talk to your neighbor/on the city/block 1204/
“...Doctors testified that Hugh is in deep coma. It seems to be a somewhat serious problem, since they still do not know how to wake up him. It has something to do with such a drug HNR3. After advertising on the city see theme about the HNR3...”
//city_bus/line488/pills of news/on the screen in real time/
“...I am proposing that we make a song of support for Hugh. I wish this site would make the - week of v
igil by Hugh - ...”
//space of the citizen/city/release movements/
“... caused a huge stir the challenging of Ubi against the statements of doctors who takes care of Hugh. Ubi categorically states that he do not understand why Hugh was treated with HNR3, and seems he not accept the arguments of his colleagues. For us laymen it's a kind of hard fighting to understand. But Ubi, despite accepting that HNR3 could bring benefits to Hugh, do not accept that it would be required, he says do not use it, mainly because it is a very powerful drug, and has side effects difficult to predict and control, so Ubi attacks strongly the fact that they used this drug and have not been publicly saying that they had used it, since he claims to be known to everyone that the deletion of this drug results in great danger, it is known that there must be a slow withdrawal from its use, and also take side drugs that bring the body and brain to a more normal situation. That is, he accuses his colleagues of bring the life of Hugh to danger. He complains that they are doing modifications in the treatment of Hugh in a devious way...”
//ring/debates and discussions/
“...only very simplistic person not to