parts in the embryo, than in the adult; so that the organ at this early age

  is less rudimentary, or even cannot be said to be in any degree

  rudimentary. Hence, also, a rudimentary organ in the adult, is often said

  to have retained its embryonic condition.

  I have now given the leading facts with respect to rudimentary organs. In

  reflecting on them, every one must be struck with astonishment: for the

  same reasoning power which tells us plainly that most parts and organs are

  exquisitely adapted for certain purposes, tells us with equal plainness

  that these rudimentary or atrophied organs, are imperfect and useless. In

  works on natural history rudimentary organs are generally said to have been

  created 'for the sake of symmetry,' or in order 'to complete the scheme of

  nature;' but this seems to me no explanation, merely a restatement of the

  fact. Would it be thought sufficient to say that because planets revolve

  in elliptic courses round the sun, satellites follow the same course round

  the planets, for the sake of symmetry, and to complete the scheme of

  nature? An eminent physiologist accounts for the presence of rudimentary

  organs, by supposing that they serve to excrete matter in excess, or

  injurious to the system; but can we suppose that the minute papilla, which

  often represents the pistil in male flowers, and which is formed merely of

  cellular tissue, can thus act? Can we suppose that the formation of

  rudimentary teeth which are subsequently absorbed, can be of any service to

  the rapidly growing embryonic calf by the excretion of precious phosphate

  of lime? When a man's fingers have been amputated, imperfect nails

  sometimes appear on the stumps: I could as soon believe that these

  vestiges of nails have appeared, not from unknown laws of growth, but in

  order to excrete horny matter, as that the rudimentary nails on the fin of

  the manatee were formed for this purpose.

  On my view of descent with modification, the origin of rudimentary organs

  is simple. We have plenty of cases of rudimentary organs in our domestic

  productions,--as the stump of a tail in tailless breeds,--the vestige of an

  ear in earless breeds,--the reappearance of minute dangling horns in

  hornless breeds of cattle, more especially, according to Youatt, in young

  animals,--and the state of the whole flower in the cauliflower. We often

  see rudiments of various parts in monsters. But I doubt whether any of

  these cases throw light on the origin of rudimentary organs in a state of

  nature, further than by showing that rudiments can be produced; for I doubt

  whether species under nature ever undergo abrupt changes. I believe that

  disuse has been the main agency; that it has led in successive generations

  to the gradual reduction of various organs, until they have become

  rudimentary,--as in the case of the eyes of animals inhabiting dark

  caverns, and of the wings of birds inhabiting oceanic islands, which have

  seldom been forced to take flight, and have ultimately lost the power of

  flying. Again, an organ useful under certain conditions, might become

  injurious under others, as with the wings of beetles living on small and

  exposed islands; and in this case natural selection would continue slowly

  to reduce the organ, until it was rendered harmless and rudimentary.

  Any change in function, which can be effected by insensibly small steps, is

  within the power of natural selection; so that an organ rendered, during

  changed habits of life, useless or injurious for one purpose, might easily

  be modified and used for another purpose. Or an organ might be retained

  for one alone of its former functions. An organ, when rendered useless,

  may well be variable, for its variations cannot be checked by natural

  selection. At whatever period of life disuse or selection reduces an

  organ, and this will generally be when the being has come to maturity and

  to its full powers of action, the principle of inheritance at corresponding

  ages will reproduce the organ in its reduced state at the same age, and

  consequently will seldom affect or reduce it in the embryo. Thus we can

  understand the greater relative size of rudimentary organs in the embryo,

  and their lesser relative size in the adult. But if each step of the

  process of reduction were to be inherited, not at the corresponding age,

  but at an extremely early period of life (as we have good reason to believe

  to be possible) the rudimentary part would tend to be wholly lost, and we

  should have a case of complete abortion. The principle, also, of economy,

  explained in a former chapter, by which the materials forming any part or

  structure, if not useful to the possessor, will be saved as far as is

  possible, will probably often come into play; and this will tend to cause

  the entire obliteration of a rudimentary organ.

  As the presence of rudimentary organs is thus due to the tendency in every

  part of the organisation, which has long existed, to be inherited--we can

  understand, on the genealogical view of classification, how it is that

  systematists have found rudimentary parts as useful as, or even sometimes

  more useful than, parts of high physiological importance. Rudimentary

  organs may be compared with the letters in a word, still retained in the

  spelling, but become useless in the pronunciation, but which serve as a

  clue in seeking for its derivation. On the view of descent with

  modification, we may conclude that the existence of organs in a

  rudimentary, imperfect, and useless condition, or quite aborted, far from

  presenting a strange difficulty, as they assuredly do on the ordinary

  doctrine of creation, might even have been anticipated, and can be

  accounted for by the laws of inheritance.

  Summary. -- In this chapter I have attempted to show, that the

  subordination of group to group in all organisms throughout all time; that

  the nature of the relationship, by which all living and extinct beings are

  united by complex, radiating, and circuitous lines of affinities into one

  grand system; the rules followed and the difficulties encountered by

  naturalists in their classifications; the value set upon characters, if

  constant and prevalent, whether of high vital importance, or of the most

  trifling importance, or, as in rudimentary organs, of no importance; the

  wide opposition in value between analogical or adaptive characters, and

  characters of true affinity; and other such rules;--all naturally follow on

  the view of the common parentage of those forms which are considered by

  naturalists as allied, together with their modification through natural

  selection, with its contingencies of extinction and divergence of

  character. In considering this view of classification, it should be borne

  in mind that the element of descent has been universally used in ranking

  together the sexes, ages, and acknowledged varieties of the same species,

  however different they may be in structure. If we extend the use of this

  element of descent,--the only certainly known cause of similarity in

  organic beings,--we shall understand what is meant by the natural system:

  it is genealogical in its attempted arrangement, with
the grades of

  acquired difference marked by the terms varieties, species, genera,

  families, orders, and classes.

  On this same view of descent with modification, all the great facts in

  Morphology become intelligible,--whether we look to the same pattern

  displayed in the homologous organs, to whatever purpose applied, of the

  different species of a class; or to the homologous parts constructed on the

  same pattern in each individual animal and plant.

  On the principle of successive slight variations, not necessarily or

  generally supervening at a very early period of life, and being inherited

  at a corresponding period, we can understand the great leading facts in

  Embryology; namely, the resemblance in an individual embryo of the

  homologous parts, which when matured will become widely different from each

  other in structure and function; and the resemblance in different species

  of a class of the homologous parts or organs, though fitted in the adult

  members for purposes as different as possible. Larvae are active embryos,

  which have become specially modified in relation to their habits of life,

  through the principle of modifications being inherited at corresponding

  ages. On this same principle--and bearing in mind, that when organs are

  reduced in size, either from disuse or selection, it will generally be at

  that period of life when the being has to provide for its own wants, and

  bearing in mind how strong is the principle of inheritance--the occurrence

  of rudimentary organs and their final abortion, present to us no

  inexplicable difficulties; on the contrary, their presence might have been

  even anticipated. The importance of embryological characters and of

  rudimentary organs in classification is intelligible, on the view that an

  arrangement is only so far natural as it is genealogical.

  Finally, the several classes of facts which have been considered in this

  chapter, seem to me to proclaim so plainly, that the innumerable species,

  genera, and families of organic beings, with which this world is peopled,

  have all descended, each within its own class or group, from common

  parents, and have all been modified in the course of descent, that I should

  without hesitation adopt this view, even if it were unsupported by other

  facts or arguments.

  Chapter XIV

  Recapitulation and Conclusion

  Recapitulation of the difficulties on the theory of Natural Selection --

  Recapitulation of the general and special circumstances in its favour --

  Causes of the general belief in the immutability of species -- How far the

  theory of natural selection may be extended -- Effects of its adoption on

  the study of Natural history -- Concluding remarks.

  As this whole volume is one long argument, it may be convenient to the

  reader to have the leading facts and inferences briefly recapitulated.

  That many and grave objections may be advanced against the theory of

  descent with modification through natural selection, I do not deny. I have

  endeavoured to give to them their full force. Nothing at first can appear

  more difficult to believe than that the more complex organs and instincts

  should have been perfected, not by means superior to, though analogous

  with, human reason, but by the accumulation of innumerable slight

  variations, each good for the individual possessor. Nevertheless, this

  difficulty, though appearing to our imagination insuperably great, cannot

  be considered real if we admit the following propositions, namely,--that

  gradations in the perfection of any organ or instinct, which we may

  consider, either do now exist or could have existed, each good of its

  kind,--that all organs and instincts are, in ever so slight a degree,

  variable,--and, lastly, that there is a struggle for existence leading to

  the preservation of each profitable deviation of structure or instinct.

  The truth of these propositions cannot, I think, be disputed.

  It is, no doubt, extremely difficult even to conjecture by what gradations

  many structures have been perfected, more especially amongst broken and

  failing groups of organic beings; but we see so many strange gradations in

  nature, as is proclaimed by the canon, 'Natura non facit saltum,' that we

  ought to be extremely cautious in saying that any organ or instinct, or any

  whole being, could not have arrived at its present state by many graduated

  steps. There are, it must be admitted, cases of special difficulty on the

  theory of natural selection; and one of the most curious of these is the

  existence of two or three defined castes of workers or sterile females in

  the same community of ants; but I have attempted to show how this

  difficulty can be mastered.

  With respect to the almost universal sterility of species when first

  crossed, which forms so remarkable a contrast with the almost universal

  fertility of varieties when crossed, I must refer the reader to the

  recapitulation of the facts given at the end of the eighth chapter, which

  seem to me conclusively to show that this sterility is no more a special

  endowment than is the incapacity of two trees to be grafted together, but

  that it is incidental on constitutional differences in the reproductive

  systems of the intercrossed species. We see the truth of this conclusion

  in the vast difference in the result, when the same two species are crossed

  reciprocally; that is, when one species is first used as the father and

  then as the mother.

  The fertility of varieties when intercrossed and of their mongrel offspring

  cannot be considered as universal; nor is their very general fertility

  surprising when we remember that it is not likely that either their

  constitutions or their reproductive systems should have been profoundly

  modified. Moreover, most of the varieties which have been experimentised

  on have been produced under domestication; and as domestication apparently

  tends to eliminate sterility, we ought not to expect it also to produce

  sterility.

  The sterility of hybrids is a very different case from that of first

  crosses, for their reproductive organs are more or less functionally

  impotent; whereas in first crosses the organs on both sides are in a

  perfect condition. As we continually see that organisms of all kinds are

  rendered in some degree sterile from their constitutions having been

  disturbed by slightly different and new conditions of life, we need not

  feel surprise at hybrids being in some degree sterile, for their

  constitutions can hardly fail to have been disturbed from being compounded

  of two distinct organisations. This parallelism is supported by another

  parallel, but directly opposite, class of facts; namely, that the vigour

  and fertility of all organic beings are increased by slight changes in

  their conditions of life, and that the offspring of slightly modified forms

  or varieties acquire from being crossed increased vigour and fertility. So

  that, on the one hand, considerable changes in the conditions of life and

  crosses between greatly modified forms, lessen fertility; and on the other

  hand, lesser changes in the conditions of life and crosses between
less

  modified forms, increase fertility.

  Turning to geographical distribution, the difficulties encountered on the

  theory of descent with modification are grave enough. All the individuals

  of the same species, and all the species of the same genus, or even higher

  group, must have descended from common parents; and therefore, in however

  distant and isolated parts of the world they are now found, they must in

  the course of successive generations have passed from some one part to the

  others. We are often wholly unable even to conjecture how this could have

  been effected. Yet, as we have reason to believe that some species have

  retained the same specific form for very long periods, enormously long as

  measured by years, too much stress ought not to be laid on the occasional

  wide diffusion of the same species; for during very long periods of time

  there will always be a good chance for wide migration by many means. A

  broken or interrupted range may often be accounted for by the extinction of

  the species in the intermediate regions. It cannot be denied that we are

  as yet very ignorant of the full extent of the various climatal and

  geographical changes which have affected the earth during modern periods;

  and such changes will obviously have greatly facilitated migration. As an

  example, I have attempted to show how potent has been the influence of the

  Glacial period on the distribution both of the same and of representative

  species throughout the world. We are as yet profoundly ignorant of the

  many occasional means of transport. With respect to distinct species of

  the same genus inhabiting very distant and isolated regions, as the process

  of modification has necessarily been slow, all the means of migration will

  have been possible during a very long period; and consequently the

  difficulty of the wide diffusion of species of the same genus is in some

  degree lessened.

  As on the theory of natural selection an interminable number of

  intermediate forms must have existed, linking together all the species in

  each group by gradations as fine as our present varieties, it may be asked,

  Why do we not see these linking forms all around us? Why are not all

  organic beings blended together in an inextricable chaos? With respect to

  existing forms, we should remember that we have no right to expect

  (excepting in rare cases) to discover directly connecting links between

  them, but only between each and some extinct and supplanted form. Even on

  a wide area, which has during a long period remained continuous, and of

  which the climate and other conditions of life change insensibly in going

  from a district occupied by one species into another district occupied by a

  closely allied species, we have no just right to expect often to find

  intermediate varieties in the intermediate zone. For we have reason to

  believe that only a few species are undergoing change at any one period;

  and all changes are slowly effected. I have also shown that the

  intermediate varieties which will at first probably exist in the

  intermediate zones, will be liable to be supplanted by the allied forms on

  either hand; and the latter, from existing in greater numbers, will

  generally be modified and improved at a quicker rate than the intermediate

  varieties, which exist in lesser numbers; so that the intermediate

  varieties will, in the long run, be supplanted and exterminated.

  On this doctrine of the extermination of an infinitude of connecting links,

  between the living and extinct inhabitants of the world, and at each

  successive period between the extinct and still older species, why is not

  every geological formation charged with such links? Why does not every

  collection of fossil remains afford plain evidence of the gradation and

  mutation of the forms of life? We meet with no such evidence, and this is

  the most obvious and forcible of the many objections which may be urged