case of mammals, were they created bearing the false marks of nourishment

  from the mother's womb? Although naturalists very properly demand a full

  explanation of every difficulty from those who believe in the mutability of

  species, on their own side they ignore the whole subject of the first

  appearance of species in what they consider reverent silence.

  It may be asked how far I extend the doctrine of the modification of

  species. The question is difficult to answer, because the more distinct

  the forms are which we may consider, by so much the arguments fall away in

  force. But some arguments of the greatest weight extend very far. All the

  members of whole classes can be connected together by chains of affinities,

  and all can be classified on the same principle, in groups subordinate to

  groups. Fossil remains sometimes tend to fill up very wide intervals

  between existing orders. Organs in a rudimentary condition plainly show

  that an early progenitor had the organ in a fully developed state; and this

  in some instances necessarily implies an enormous amount of modification in

  the descendants. Throughout whole classes various structures are formed on

  the same pattern, and at an embryonic age the species closely resemble each

  other. Therefore I cannot doubt that the theory of descent with

  modification embraces all the members of the same class. I believe that

  animals have descended from at most only four or five progenitors, and

  plants from an equal or lesser number.

  Analogy would lead me one step further, namely, to the belief that all

  animals and plants have descended from some one prototype. But analogy may

  be a deceitful guide. Nevertheless all living things have much in common,

  in their chemical composition, their germinal vesicles, their cellular

  structure, and their laws of growth and reproduction. We see this even in

  so trifling a circumstance as that the same poison often similarly affects

  plants and animals; or that the poison secreted by the gall-fly produces

  monstrous growths on the wild rose or oak-tree. Therefore I should infer

  from analogy that probably all the organic beings which have ever lived on

  this earth have descended from some one primordial form, into which life

  was first breathed.

  When the views entertained in this volume on the origin of species, or when

  analogous views are generally admitted, we can dimly foresee that there

  will be a considerable revolution in natural history. Systematists will be

  able to pursue their labours as at present; but they will not be

  incessantly haunted by the shadowy doubt whether this or that form be in

  essence a species. This I feel sure, and I speak after experience, will be

  no slight relief. The endless disputes whether or not some fifty species

  of British brambles are true species will cease. Systematists will have

  only to decide (not that this will be easy) whether any form be

  sufficiently constant and distinct from other forms, to be capable of

  definition; and if definable, whether the differences be sufficiently

  important to deserve a specific name. This latter point will become a far

  more essential consideration than it is at present; for differences,

  however slight, between any two forms, if not blended by intermediate

  gradations, are looked at by most naturalists as sufficient to raise both

  forms to the rank of species. Hereafter we shall be compelled to

  acknowledge that the only distinction between species and well-marked

  varieties is, that the latter are known, or believed, to be connected at

  the present day by intermediate gradations, whereas species were formerly

  thus connected. Hence, without quite rejecting the consideration of the

  present existence of intermediate gradations between any two forms, we

  shall be led to weigh more carefully and to value higher the actual amount

  of difference between them. It is quite possible that forms now generally

  acknowledged to be merely varieties may hereafter be thought worthy of

  specific names, as with the primrose and cowslip; and in this case

  scientific and common language will come into accordance. In short, we

  shall have to treat species in the same manner as those naturalists treat

  genera, who admit that genera are merely artificial combinations made for

  convenience. This may not be a cheering prospect; but we shall at least be

  freed from the vain search for the undiscovered and undiscoverable essence

  of the term species.

  The other and more general departments of natural history will rise greatly

  in interest. The terms used by naturalists of affinity, relationship,

  community of type, paternity, morphology, adaptive characters, rudimentary

  and aborted organs, &c., will cease to be metaphorical, and will have a

  plain signification. When we no longer look at an organic being as a

  savage looks at a ship, as at something wholly beyond his comprehension;

  when we regard every production of nature as one which has had a history;

  when we contemplate every complex structure and instinct as the summing up

  of many contrivances, each useful to the possessor, nearly in the same way

  as when we look at any great mechanical invention as the summing up of the

  labour, the experience, the reason, and even the blunders of numerous

  workmen; when we thus view each organic being, how far more interesting, I

  speak from experience, will the study of natural history become!

  A grand and almost untrodden field of inquiry will be opened, on the causes

  and laws of variation, on correlation of growth, on the effects of use and

  disuse, on the direct action of external conditions, and so forth. The

  study of domestic productions will rise immensely in value. A new variety

  raised by man will be a far more important and interesting subject for

  study than one more species added to the infinitude of already recorded

  species. Our classifications will come to be, as far as they can be so

  made, genealogies; and will then truly give what may be called the plan of

  creation. The rules for classifying will no doubt become simpler when we

  have a definite object in view. We possess no pedigrees or armorial

  bearings; and we have to discover and trace the many diverging lines of

  descent in our natural genealogies, by characters of any kind which have

  long been inherited. Rudimentary organs will speak infallibly with respect

  to the nature of long-lost structures. Species and groups of species,

  which are called aberrant, and which may fancifully be called living

  fossils, will aid us in forming a picture of the ancient forms of life.

  Embryology will reveal to us the structure, in some degree obscured, of the

  prototypes of each great class.

  When we can feel assured that all the individuals of the same species, and

  all the closely allied species of most genera, have within a not very

  remote period descended from one parent, and have migrated from some one

  birthplace; and when we better know the many means of migration, then, by

  the light which geology now throws, and will continue to throw, on former

  changes of climate and of the level of the land, we shall surely be enabled

  to
trace in an admirable manner the former migrations of the inhabitants of

  the whole world. Even at present, by comparing the differences of the

  inhabitants of the sea on the opposite sides of a continent, and the nature

  of the various inhabitants of that continent in relation to their apparent

  means of immigration, some light can be thrown on ancient geography.

  The noble science of Geology loses glory from the extreme imperfection of

  the record. The crust of the earth with its embedded remains must not be

  looked at as a well-filled museum, but as a poor collection made at hazard

  and at rare intervals. The accumulation of each great fossiliferous

  formation will be recognised as having depended on an unusual concurrence

  of circumstances, and the blank intervals between the successive stages as

  having been of vast duration. But we shall be able to gauge with some

  security the duration of these intervals by a comparison of the preceding

  and succeeding organic forms. We must be cautious in attempting to

  correlate as strictly contemporaneous two formations, which include few

  identical species, by the general succession of their forms of life. As

  species are produced and exterminated by slowly acting and still existing

  causes, and not by miraculous acts of creation and by catastrophes; and as

  the most important of all causes of organic change is one which is almost

  independent of altered and perhaps suddenly altered physical conditions,

  namely, the mutual relation of organism to organism,--the improvement of

  one being entailing the improvement or the extermination of others; it

  follows, that the amount of organic change in the fossils of consecutive

  formations probably serves as a fair measure of the lapse of actual time.

  A number of species, however, keeping in a body might remain for a long

  period unchanged, whilst within this same period, several of these species,

  by migrating into new countries and coming into competition with foreign

  associates, might become modified; so that we must not overrate the

  accuracy of organic change as a measure of time. During early periods of

  the earth's history, when the forms of life were probably fewer and

  simpler, the rate of change was probably slower; and at the first dawn of

  life, when very few forms of the simplest structure existed, the rate of

  change may have been slow in an extreme degree. The whole history of the

  world, as at present known, although of a length quite incomprehensible by

  us, will hereafter be recognised as a mere fragment of time, compared with

  the ages which have elapsed since the first creature, the progenitor of

  innumerable extinct and living descendants, was created.

  In the distant future I see open fields for far more important researches.

  Psychology will be based on a new foundation, that of the necessary

  acquirement of each mental power and capacity by gradation. Light will be

  thrown on the origin of man and his history.

  Authors of the highest eminence seem to be fully satisfied with the view

  that each species has been independently created. To my mind it accords

  better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator,

  that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of

  the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining

  the birth and death of the individual. When I view all beings not as

  special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which

  lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited, they

  seem to me to become ennobled. Judging from the past, we may safely infer

  that not one living species will transmit its unaltered likeness to a

  distant futurity. And of the species now living very few will transmit

  progeny of any kind to a far distant futurity; for the manner in which all

  organic beings are grouped, shows that the greater number of species of

  each genus, and all the species of many genera, have left no descendants,

  but have become utterly extinct. We can so far take a prophetic glance

  into futurity as to foretel that it will be the common and widely-spread

  species, belonging to the larger and dominant groups, which will ultimately

  prevail and procreate new and dominant species. As all the living forms of

  life are the lineal descendants of those which lived long before the

  Silurian epoch, we may feel certain that the ordinary succession by

  generation has never once been broken, and that no cataclysm has desolated

  the whole world. Hence we may look with some confidence to a secure future

  of equally inappreciable length. And as natural selection works solely by

  and for the good of each being, all corporeal and mental endowments will

  tend to progress towards perfection.

  It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many

  plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various

  insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and

  to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each

  other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been

  produced by laws acting around us. These laws, taken in the largest sense,

  being Growth with Reproduction; Inheritance which is almost implied by

  reproduction; Variability from the indirect and direct action of the

  external conditions of life, and from use and disuse; a Ratio of Increase

  so high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a consequence to Natural

  Selection, entailing Divergence of Character and the Extinction of

  less-improved forms. Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death,

  the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the

  production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in

  this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed

  into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling

  on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning

  endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being,

  evolved.

  Subject Index

  Aberrant groups

  Abyssinia, plants of

  Acclimatisation

  Affinities of extinct species; of organic beings

  Agassiz on Amblyopsis; on groups of species suddenly appearing; on

  embryological succession; on the glacial period; on embryological

  characters; on the embryos of vertebrata; on parallelism of embryological

  development and geological succession

  Algae of New Zealand

  Alligators, males, fighting

  Amblyopsis, blind fish

  America, North, productions allied to those of Europe; boulders and

  glaciers of; South, no modern formations on west coast

  Ammonites, sudden extinction of

  Anagallis, sterility of

  Analog of variations

  Ancylus

  Animals, not domesticated from being variable; domestic; descended from

  several stocks; acclimatisation of; of Australia; with thicker fur in cold

  climates; blind, in caves; extinct, of Australia

  Anomma

  Antarctic islands, ancient flora of

  Antirr
hinum

  Ants attending aphides; slave-making instinct

  Ants, neuter, structure of

  Aphides attended by ants

  Aphis, development of

  Apteryx

  Arab horses

  Aralo-Caspian Sea

  Archiac, M. de, on the succession of species

  Artichoke, Jerusalem

  Ascension, plants of

  Asclepias, pollen of

  Asparagus

  Aspicarpa

  Asses, striped

  Ateuchus

  Audubon, on habits of frigate-bird; on variation in birds'-nests; on heron

  eating seeds

  Australia, animals of; dogs of; extinct animals of; European plants in

  Azara on flies destroying cattle

  Azores, flora of

  Babington, Mr., on British plants

  Balancement of growth

  Bamboo with hooks

  Barberry, flowers of

  Barrande, M., on Silurian colonies; on the succession of species; on

  parallelism of palaeozoic formations; on affinities of ancient species

  Barriers, importance of

  Batrachians on islands

  Bats, how structure acquired; distribution of

  Bear, catching water-insects

  Bee, sting of; queen, killing rivals

  Bees fertilizing flowers; hive; not sucking the red clover; cell-making

  instinct; humble, cells of; parasitic

  Beetles, wingless, in Madeira; with deficient tarsi

  Bentham, Mr., on British plants; on classification

  Berkeley, Mr., on seeds in salt-water

  Bermuda, birds of

  Birds acquiring fear; annually cross the Atlantic; colour of, on

  continents; fossil, in caves of Brazil; of Madeira, Bermuda, and Galapagos;

  song of males; transporting seeds; waders; wingless; with traces of

  embryonic teeth

  Bizcacha, affinities of

  Bladder for swimming in fish

  Blindness of cave animals

  Blyth, Mr., on distinctness of Indian cattle; on striped Hemionus; on

  crossed geese

  Boar; shoulder-pad of

  Borrow, Mr., on the Spanish pointer

  Bory St. Vincent, on Batrachians

  Bosquet, M., on fossil Chthamalus

  Boulders, erratic, on the Azores

  Branchiae

  Brent, Mr., on house-tumblers; on hawks killing pigeons

  Brewer, Dr., on American cuckoo

  Britain, mammals of

  Bronn, on duration of specific forms

  Brown, Robert, on classification

  Buckman, on variation in plants

  Buzareingues on sterility of varieties

  Cabbage, varieties of, crossed

  Calceolaria

  Canary-birds, sterility of hybrids

  Cape de Verde islands

  Cape of Good Hope, plants of

  Carrier-pigeons killed by hawks

  Cassini on flowers of composita

  Catasetum

  Cats, with blue eyes, deaf; variation in habits of; curling tail when going

  to spring

  Cattle destroying fir-trees; destroyed by flies in La Plata; breeds of,

  locally extinct; fertility of Indian and European breeds

  Cave, inhabitants of, blind

  Centres of creation

  Cephalopodae, development of

  Cervulus

  Cetacea, teeth and hair

  Ceylon, plants of

  Chalk formation

  Charlock

  Checks to increase; mutual

  Chickens, instinctive tameness of

  Chthamalinae

  Chthamalus, cretacean species of

  Circumstances favourable to selection of domestic products; to natural

  selection

  Cirripedes capable of crossing; carapace aborted; their ovigerous frena;

  fossil; larvae of

  Clift, Mr., on the succession of types

  Climate, effects of, in checking increase of beings; adaptation of, to

  organisms