Mr. Opalsen looked a trifle surprised at the question.

  “Yes,” he said hesitatingly, “that is so.”

  “But what does that matter?” broke in Mrs. Opalsen tearfully. “It’s my necklace I want. It was unique. No money could be the same.”

  “I comprehend, madame,” said Poirot soothingly. “I comprehend perfectly. To la femme sentiment is everything—is it not so? But, monsieur, who has not the so fine susceptibility, will doubtless find some slight consolation in the fact.”

  “Of course, of course,” said Mr. Opalsen rather uncertainly. “Still—”

  He was interrupted by a shout of triumph from the inspector. He came in dangling something from his fingers.

  With a cry, Mrs. Opalsen heaved herself up from her chair. She was a changed woman.

  “Oh, oh, my necklace!”

  She clasped it to her breast with both hands. We crowded round.

  “Where was it?” demanded Opalsen.

  “Maid’s bed. In among the springs of the wire mattress. She must have stolen it and hidden it there before the chambermaid arrived on the scene.”

  “You permit, madame?” said Poirot gently. He took the necklace from her and examined it closely; then handed it back with a bow.

  “I’m afraid, madame, you’ll have to hand it over to us for the time being,” said the inspector. “We shall want it for the charge. But it shall be returned to you as soon as possible.”

  Mr. Opalsen frowned.

  “Is that necessary?”

  “I’m afraid so, sir. Just a formality.”

  “Oh, let him take it, Ed!” cired his wife. “I’d feel safer if he did. I shouldn’t sleep a wink thinking someone else might try to get hold of it. That wretched girl! And I would never have believed it of her.”

  “There, there, my dear, don’t take on so.”

  I felt a gentle pressure on my arm. It was Poirot.

  “Shall we slip away, my friend? I think our services are no longer needed.”

  Once outside, however, he hesitated, and then, much to my surprise, he remarked:

  “I should rather like to see the room next door.”

  The door was not locked, and we entered. The room, which was a large double one, was unoccupied. Dust lay about rather noticeably, and my sensitive friend gave a characteristic grimace as he ran his finger round a rectangular mark on a table near the window.

  “The service leaves to be desired,” he observed dryly.

  He was staring thoughtfully out of the window, and seemed to have fallen into a brown study.

  “Well?” I demanded impatiently. “What did we come in here for?”

  He started.

  “Je vous demande pardon, mon ami. I wished to see if the door was really bolted on this side also.”

  “Well,” I said, glancing at the door which communicated with the room we had just left, “it is bolted.”

  Poirot nodded. He still seemed to be thinking.

  “And anyway,” I continued, “what does it matter? The case is over. I wish you’d had more chance of distinguishing yourself. But it was the kind of case that even a stiff-backed idiot like that inspector couldn’t go wrong over.”

  Poirot shook his head.

  “The case is not over, my friend. It will not be over until we find out who stole the pearls.”

  “But the maid did!”

  “Why do you say that?”

  “Why,” I stammered, “they were found—actually in her mattress.”

  “Ta, ta, ta!” said Poirot impatiently. “Those were not the pearls.”

  “What?”

  “Imitation, mon ami.”

  The statement took my breath away. Poirot was smiling placidly.

  “The good inspector obviously knows nothing of jewels. But presently there will be a fine hullabaloo!”

  “Come!” I cried, dragging at his arm.

  “Where?”

  “We must tell the Opalsens at once.”

  “I think not.”

  “But that poor woman—”

  “Eh bien; that poor woman, as you call her, will have a much better night believing the jewels to be safe.”

  “But the thief may escape with them!”

  “As usual, my friend, you speak without reflection. How do you know that the pearls Mrs. Opalsen locked up so carefully tonight were not the false ones, and that the real robbery did not take place at a much earlier date?”

  “Oh!” I said, bewildered.

  “Exactly,” said Poirot, beaming. “We start again.”

  He led the way out of the room, paused a moment as though considering, and then walked down to the end of the corridor, stopping outside the small den where the chambermaids and valets of the respective floors congregated. Our particular chambermaid appeared to be holding a small court there, and to be retailing her late experiences to an appreciative audience. She stopped in the middle of a sentence. Poirot bowed with his usual politeness.

  “Excuse that I derange you, but I shall be obliged if you will unlock for me the door of Mr. Opalsen’s room.”

  The woman rose willingly, and we accompanied her down the passage again. Mr. Opalsen’s room was on the other side of the corridor, its door facing that of his wife’s room. The chambermaid unlocked it with her passkey, and we entered.

  As she was about to depart Poirot detained her.

  “One moment; have you ever seen among the effects of Mr. Opalsen a card like this?”

  He held out a plain white card, rather highly glazed and uncommon in appearance. The maid took it and scrutinized it carefully.

  “No, sir, I can’t say I have. But, anyway, the valet has most to do with the gentlemen’s rooms.”

  “I see. Thank you.”

  Poirot took back the card. The woman departed. Poirot appeared to reflect a little. Then he gave a short, sharp nod of the head.

  “Ring the bell, I pray you, Hastings. Three times for the valet.”

  I obeyed, devoured with curiosity. Meanwhile Poirot had emptied the wastepaper basket on the floor, and was swiftly going through its contents.

  In a few moments the valet answered the bell. To him Poirot put the same question, and handed him the card to examine. But the response was the same. The valet had never seen a card of that particular quality among Mr. Opalsen’s belongings. Poirot thanked him, and he withdrew, somewhat unwillingly, with an inquisitive glance at the overturned wastepaper basket and the litter on the floor. He could hardly have helped overhearing Poirot’s thoughtful remark as he bundled the torn papers back again:

  “And the necklace was heavily insured. . . .”

  “Poirot,” I cried, “I see—”

  “You see nothing, my friend,” he replied quickly. “As usual, nothing at all! It is incredible—but there it is. Let us return to our own apartments.”

  We did so in silence. Once there, to my intense surprise, Poirot effected a rapid change of clothing.

  “I go to London tonight,” he explained. “It is imperative.”

  “What?”

  “Absolutely. The real work, that of the brain (ah, those brave little grey cells), it is done. I go to seek the confirmation. I shall find it! Impossible to deceive Hercule Poirot!”

  “You’ll come a cropper one of these days,” I observed, rather disgusted by his vanity.

  “Do not be enraged, I beg of you, mon ami. I count on you to do me a service—of your friendship.”

  “Of course,” I said eagerly, rather ashamed of my moroseness. “What is it?”

  “The sleeve of my coat that I have taken off—will you brush it? See you, a little white powder has clung to it. You without doubt observed me run my finger round the drawer of the dressing table?”

  “No, I didn’t.”

  “You should observe my actions, my friend. Thus I obtained the powder on my finger, and, being a little overexcited, I rubbed it on my sleeve; an action without method which I deplore—false to all my principles.”

  “But
what was the powder?” I asked, not particularly interested in Poirot’s principles.

  “Not the poison of the Borgias,” replied Poirot with a twinkle. “I see your imagination mounting. I should say it was French chalk.”

  “French chalk?”

  “Yes, cabinetmakers use it to make drawers run smoothly.”

  I laughed.

  “You old sinner! I thought you were working up to something exciting.”

  “Au revoir, my friend. I save myself. I fly!”

  The door shut behind him. With a smile, half of derision, half of affection, I picked up the coat and stretched out my hand for the clothes brush.

  II

  The next morning, hearing nothing from Poirot, I went out for a stroll, met some old friends, and lunched with them at their hotel. In the afternoon we went for a spin. A punctured tyre delayed us, and it was past eight when I got back to the Grand Metropolitan.

  The first sight that met my eyes was Poirot, looking even more diminutive than usual, sandwiched between the Opalsens, beaming in a state of placid satisfaction.

  “Mon ami Hastings!” he cried, and sprang to meet me. “Embrace me, my friend; all has marched to a marvel!”

  Luckily, the embrace was merely figurative—not a thing one is always sure of with Poirot.

  “Do you mean—” I began.

  “Just wonderful, I call it!” said Mrs. Opalsen, smiling all over her fat face. “Didn’t I tell you, Ed, that if he couldn’t get back my pearls nobody would?”

  “You did, my dear, you did. And you were right.”

  I looked helplessly at Poirot, and he answered the glance.

  “My friend Hastings is, as you say in England, all at the seaside. Seat yourself, and I will recount to you all the affair that has so happily ended.”

  “Ended?”

  “But yes. They are arrested.”

  “Who are arrested?”

  “The chambermaid and the valet, parbleu! You did not suspect? Not with my parting hint about the French chalk?”

  “You said cabinetmakers used it.”

  “Certainly they do—to make drawers slide easily. Somebody wanted the drawer to slide in and out without any noise. Who could that be? Obviously, only the chambermaid. The plan was so ingenious that it did not at once leap to the eye—not even to the eye of Hercule Poirot.

  “Listen, this was how it was done. The valet was in the empty room next door, waiting. The French maid leaves the room. Quick as a flash the chambermaid whips open the drawer, takes out the jewel case and, slipping back the bolt, passes it through the door. The valet opens it at his leisure with the duplicate key with which he has provided himself, extracts the necklace, and waits his time. Célestine leaves the room again, and—pst!—in a flash the case is passed back again and replaced in the drawer.

  “Madame arrives, the theft is discovered. The chambermaid demands to be searched, with a good deal of righteous indignation, and leaves the room without a stain on her character. The imitation necklace with which they have provided themselves has been concealed in the French girl’s bed that morning by the chambermaid—a master stroke, ça!”

  “But what did you go to London for?”

  “You remember the card?”

  “Certainly. It puzzled me—and puzzles me still. I thought—”

  I hesitated delicately, glancing at Mr. Opalsen.

  Poirot laughed heartily.

  “Une blague! For the benefit of the valet. The card was one with a specially prepared surface—for fingerprints. I went straight to Scotland Yard, asked for our old friend Inspector Japp, and laid the facts before him. As I had suspected, the fingerprints proved to be those of two well-known jewel thieves who have been ‘wanted’ for some time. Japp came down with me, the thieves were arrested, and the necklace was discovered in the valet’s possession. A clever pair, but they failed in method. Have I not told you, Hastings, at least thirty-six times, that without method—”

  “At least thirty-six thousand times!” I interrupted. “But where did their ‘method’ break down?”

  “Mon ami, it is a good plan to take a place as chambermaid or valet—but you must not shirk your work. They left an empty room undusted; and therefore, when the man put down the jewel case on the little table near the communicating door, it left a square mark—”

  “I remember,” I cried.

  “Before, I was undecided. Then—I knew!”

  There was a moment’s silence.

  “And I’ve got my pearls,” said Mrs. Opalsen as a sort of Greek chorus.

  “Well,” I said, “I’d better have some dinner.”

  Poirot accompanied me.

  “This ought to mean kudos for you,” I observed.

  “Pas du tout,” replied Poirot tranquilly. “Japp and the local inspector will divide the credit between them. But”—he tapped his pocket—“I have a cheque here, from Mr. Opalsen, and, how you say, my friend? This weekend has not gone according to plan. Shall we return here next weekend—at my expense this time?”

  Three

  THE KING OF CLUBS

  “The King of Clubs” was first published as “The Adventures of the King of Clubs” in The Sketch, March 21, 1923.

  I

  Truth,” I observed, laying aside the Daily Newsmonger, “is stranger than fiction!”

  The remark was not, perhaps, an original one. It appeared to incense my friend. Tilting his egg-shaped head on one side, the little man carefully flicked an imaginary fleck of dust from his carefully creased trousers, and observed: “How profound! What a thinker is my friend Hastings!”

  Without displaying any annoyance at this quite uncalled-for gibe, I tapped the sheet I had laid aside.

  “You’ve read this morning’s paper?”

  “I have. And after reading it, I folded it anew symmetrically. I did not cast it on the floor as you have done, with your so lamentable absence of order and method.”

  (That is the worst of Poirot. Order and Method are his gods. He goes so far as to attribute all his success to them.)

  “Then you saw the account of the murder of Henry Reedburn, the impresario? It was that which prompted my remark. Not only is truth stranger than fiction—it is more dramatic. Think of that solid middle-class English family, the Oglanders. Father and mother, son and daughter, typical of thousands of families all over this country. The men of the family go to the city every day; the women look after the house. Their lives are perfectly peaceful, and utterly monotonous. Last night they were sitting in their neat suburban drawing room at Daisymead, Streatham, playing bridge. Suddenly, without any warning, the French window bursts open, and a woman staggers into the room. Her grey satin frock is marked with a crimson stain. She utters one word, “Murder!” before she sinks to the ground insensible. It is possible that they recognize her from her pictures as Valerie Saintclair, the famous dancer who has lately taken London by storm!”

  “Is this your eloquence, or that of the Daily Newsmonger?” inquired Poirot.

  “The Daily Newsmonger was in a hurry to go to press, and contented itself with bare facts. But the dramatic possibilities of the story struck me at once.”

  Poirot nodded thoughtfully. “Wherever there is human nature, there is drama. But—it is not always just where you think it is. Remember that. Still, I too am interested in the case, since it is likely that I shall be connected with it.”

  “Indeed?”

  “Yes. A gentleman rang me up this morning, and made an appointment with me on behalf of Prince Paul of Maurania.”

  “But what has that to do with it?”

  “You do not read your pretty little English scandal-papers. The ones with the funny stories, and ‘a little mouse has heard—’ or ‘a little bird would like to know—’ See here.”

  I followed his short stubby finger along the paragraph: “—whether the foreign prince and the famous dancer are really affinities! And if the lady likes her new diamond ring!”

  “And now to resume your s
o dramatic narrative,” said Poirot. “Mademoiselle Saintclair had just fainted on the drawing room carpet at Daisymead, you remember.”

  I shrugged. “As a result of Mademoiselle’s first murmured words when she came round, the two male Oglanders stepped out, one to fetch a doctor to attend to the lady, who was evidently suffering terribly from shock, and the other to the police station—whence after telling his story, he accompanied the police to Mon Désir, Mr. Reedburn’s magnificent villa, which is situated at no great distance from Daisymead. There they found the great man, who by the way suffers from a somewhat unsavoury reputation, lying in the library with the back of his head cracked open like an eggshell.”

  “I have cramped your style,” said Poirot kindly. “Forgive me, I pray . . . Ah, here is M. le Prince!”

  Our distinguished visitor was announced under the title of Count Feodor. He was a strange-looking youth, tall, eager, with a weak chin, the famous Mauranberg mouth, and the dark fiery eyes of a fanatic.

  “M. Poirot?”

  My friend bowed.

  “Monsieur, I am in terrible trouble, greater than I can well express—”

  Poirot waved his hand. “I comprehend your anxiety. Mademoiselle Saintclair is a very dear friend, is it not so?”

  The prince replied simply: “I hope to make her my wife.”

  Poirot sat up in his chair, and his eyes opened.

  The prince continued: “I should not be the first of my family to make a morganatic marriage. My brother Alexander has also defied the Emperor. We are living now in more enlightened days, free from the old caste-prejudice. Besides, Mademoiselle Saintclair, in actual fact, is quite my equal in rank. You have heard hints as to her history?”

  “There are many romantic stories of her origin—not an uncommon thing with famous dancers. I have heard that she is the daughter of an Irish charwoman, also the story which makes her mother a Russian grand duchess.”

  “The first story is, of course, nonsense,” said the young man. “But the second is true. Valerie, though bound to secrecy, has let me guess as much. Besides, she proves it unconsciously in a thousand ways. I believe in heredity, M. Poirot.”

  “I too believe in heredity,” said Poirot thoughtfully. “I have seen some strange things in connection with it—moi qui vous parle . . . But to business, M. le Prince. What do you want of me? What do you fear? I may speak freely, may I not? Is there anything to connect Mademoiselle Saintclair with the crime? She knew Reedburn of course?”