“Got into a bad set, have they? I was a bit afraid of that. One hears a word dropped here and there.” He looked pathetically at Poirot. “But what am I to do, Mr. Poirot? What am I to do?”
Poirot shook his head perplexedly.
General Grant went on:
“What’s wrong with the bunch they’re running with?”
Poirot replied by another question.
“Have you noticed, General Grant, that any of your daughters have been moody, excited, then depressed—nervy—uncertain in their tempers?”
“Damme, sir, you’re talking like a patent medicine. No, I haven’t noticed anything of the kind.”
“That is fortunate,” said Poirot gravely.
“What the devil is the meaning of all this, sir?”
“Drugs!”
“WHAT!”
The word came in a roar.
Poirot said:
“An attempt is being made to induce your daughter Sheila to become a drug addict. The cocaine habit is very quickly formed. A week or two will suffice. Once the habit is formed, an addict will pay anything, do anything, to get a further supply of the drug. You can realize what a rich haul the person who peddles that drug can make.”
He listened in silence to the spluttering, wrathful blasphemies that poured from the old man’s lips. Then, as the fires died down, with a final choice description of exactly what he, the General, would do to the blinkety blinkety son of a blank when he got hold of him, Hercule Poirot said:
“We have first, as your so admirable Mrs. Beeton says, to catch the hare. Once we have caught our drug pedlar, I will turn him over to you with the greatest pleasure, General.”
He got up, tripped over a heavily carved, small table, regained his balance with a clutch at the General, murmured:
“A thousand pardons, and may I beg of you, General—you understand, beg of you—to say nothing whatever about all this to your daughters.”
“What? I’ll have the truth out of them, that’s what I’ll have!”
“That is exactly what you will not have. All you will get is a lie.”
“But damme, sir—”
“I assure you, General Grant, you must hold your tongue. That is vital—you understand? Vital!”
“Oh well, have it your own way,” growled the old soldier.
He was mastered but not convinced.
Hercule Poirot picked his way carefully through the Benares brass and went out.
V
Mrs. Larkin’s room was full of people.
Mrs. Larkin herself was mixing cocktails at a side table. She was a tall woman with pale auburn hair rolled into the back of her neck. Her eyes were greenish-grey with big, black pupils. She moved easily, with a kind of sinister grace. She looked as though she were in the early thirties. Only a close scrutiny revealed the lines at the corners of the eyes and hinted that she was ten years older than her looks.
Hercule Poirot had been brought here by a brisk, middle-aged woman, a friend of Lady Carmichael’s. He found himself given a cocktail and further directed to take one to a girl sitting in the window. The girl was small and fair—her face was pink and white and suspiciously angelic. Her eyes, Hercule Poirot noticed at once, were alert and suspicious.
He said:
“To your continued good health, Mademoiselle.”
She nodded and drank. Then she said abruptly:
“You know my sister.”
“Your sister? Ah, you are then one of the Miss Grants?”
“I’m Pam Grant.”
“And where is your sister today?”
“She’s out hunting. Ought to be back soon.”
“I met your sister in London.”
“I know.”
“She told you?”
Pam Grant nodded. She said abruptly:
“Was Sheila in a jam?”
“So she did not tell you everything?”
The girl shook her head. She asked:
“Was Tony Hawker there?”
Before Poirot could answer, the door opened and Hawker and Sheila Grant came in. They were in hunting kit and Sheila had a streak of mud on her cheek.
“Hullo, people, we’ve come in for a drink. Tony’s flask is dry.”
Poirot murmured:
“Talk of the angels—”
Pam Grant snapped:
“Devils, you mean.”
Poirot said sharply:
“Is it like that?”
Beryl Larkin had come forward. She said:
“Here you are, Tony. Tell me about the run? Did you draw Gelert’s Copse?”
She drew him away skilfully to a sofa near the fireplace. Poirot saw him turn his head and glance at Sheila before he went.
Sheila had seen Poirot. She hesitated a minute, then came over to the two in the window. She said abruptly:
“So it was you who came to the house yesterday?”
“Did your father tell you?”
She shook her head.
“Abdul described you. I—guessed.”
Pam exclaimed: “You went to see Father?”
Poirot said:
“Ah—yes. We have—some mutual friends.”
Pam said sharply:
“I don’t believe it.”
“What do you not believe? That your father and I could have a mutual friend?”
The girl flushed.
“Don’t be stupid. I meant—that wasn’t really your reason—”
She turned on her sister.
“Why don’t you say something, Sheila?”
Sheila started. She said:
“It wasn’t—it wasn’t anything to do with Tony Hawker?”
“Why should it be?” asked Poirot.
Sheila flushed and went back across the room to the others.
Pam said with sudden vehemence but in a lowered voice:
“I don’t like Tony Hawker. There—there’s something sinister about him—and about her—Mrs. Larkin, I mean. Look at them now.”
Poirot followed her glance.
Hawker’s head was close to that of his hostess. He appeared to be soothing her. Her voice rose for a minute.
“—but I can’t wait. I want it now!”
Poirot said with a little smile:
“Les femmes—whatever it is—they always want it now, do they not?”
But Pam Grant did not respond. Her face was cast down. She was nervously pleating and repleating her tweed skirt.
Poirot murmured conversationally:
“You are quite a different type from your sister, Mademoiselle.”
She flung her head up, impatient of banalities. She said:
“M. Poirot. What’s the stuff Tony’s been giving Sheila? What is it that’s been making her—different?”
He looked straight at her. He asked:
“Have you ever taken cocaine, Miss Grant?”
She shook her head.
“Oh no! So that’s it? Cocaine? But isn’t that very dangerous?”
Sheila Grant had come over to them, a fresh drink in her hand. She said:
“What’s dangerous?”
Poirot said:
“We are talking of the effects of drug taking. Of the slow death of the mind and spirit—the destroying of all that is true and good in a human being.”
Sheila Grant caught her breath. The drink in her hand swayed and spilled on the floor. Poirot went on:
“Dr. Stoddart has, I think, made clear to you just what that death in life entails. It is so easily done—so hard to undo. The person who deliberately profits from the degradation and misery of other people is a vampire preying on flesh and blood.”
He turned away. Behind him he heard Pam Grant’s voice say: “Sheila!” and caught a whisper—a faint whisper—from Sheila Grant. It was so low he hardly heard it.
“The flask . . .”
Hercule Poirot said goodbye to Mrs. Larkin and went out into the hall. On the hall table was a hunting flask lying with a crop and a hat. Poirot picked it up. Th
ere were initials on it: A.H.
Poirot murmured to himself:
“Tony’s flask is empty?”
He shook it gently. There was no sound of liquor. He unscrewed the top.
Tony Hawker’s flask was not empty. It was full—of white powder. . . .
VI
Hercule Poirot stood on the terrace of Lady Carmichael’s house and pleaded with a girl.
He said:
“You are very young, Mademoiselle. It is my belief that you have not known, not really known, what it is you and your sisters have been doing. You have been feeding, like the mares of Diomedes, on human flesh.”
Sheila shuddered and gave a sob. She said:
“It sounds horrible, put like that. And yet it’s true! I never realized it until that evening in London when Dr. Stoddart talked to me. He was so grave—so sincere. I saw then what an awful thing it was I had been doing . . . Before that I thought it was—Oh! rather like drink after hours—something people would pay to get, but not something that really mattered very much!”
Poirot said:
“And now?”
Sheila Grant said:
“I’ll do anything you say. I—I’ll talk to the others,” she added . . . “I don’t suppose Dr. Stoddart will ever speak to me again. . . .”
“On the contrary,” said Poirot. “Both Dr. Stoddart and I are prepared to help you in every way in our power to start afresh. You can trust us. But one thing must be done. There is one person who must be destroyed—destroyed utterly, and only you and your sisters can destroy him. It is your evidence and your evidence alone that will convict him.”
“You mean—my father?”
“Not your father, Mademoiselle. Did I not tell you that Hercule Poirot knows everything? Your photograph was easily recognized in official quarters. You are Sheila Kelly—a persistent young shoplifter who was sent to a reformatory some years ago. When you came out of that reformatory, you were approached by the man who calls himself General Grant and offered this post—the post of a ‘daughter.’ There would be plenty of money, plenty of fun, a good time. All you had to do was to introduce the ‘snuff’ to your friends, always pretending that someone else had given it to you. Your ‘sisters’ were in the same case as yourself.”
He paused and said:
“Come now, Mademoiselle—this man must be exposed and sentenced. After that—”
“Yes, afterwards?”
Poirot coughed. He said with a smile:
“You shall be dedicated to the service of the Gods. . . .”
VII
Michael Stoddart stared at Poirot in amazement. He said:
“General Grant? General Grant?”
“Precisely, mon cher. The whole mise en scène, you know, was what you would call ‘very bogus.’ The Buddhas, the Benares brass, the Indian servant! And the gout, too! It is out of date, the gout. It is old, old gentlemen who have the gout—not the fathers of young ladies of nineteen.
“Moreover I made quite certain. As I go out, I stumble, I clutch at the gouty foot. So perturbed is the gentleman by what I have been saying that he did not even notice. Oh yes, he is very, very bogus, that General! Tout de même, it is a smart idea. The retired Anglo-Indian General, the well-known comic figure with a liver and a choleric temper, he settles down—not amongst other retired Anglo-Indian Army officers—oh no, he goes to a milieu far too expensive for the usual retired Army man. There are rich people there, people from London, an excellent field to market the goods. And who would suspect four lively, attractive, young girls? If anything comes out, they will be considered as victims—that for a certainty!”
“What was your idea exactly when you went to see the old devil? Did you want to put the wind up him?”
“Yes. I wanted to see what would happen. I had not long to wait. The girls had their orders. Anthony Hawker, actually one of their victims, was to be the scapegoat. Sheila was to tell me about the flask in the hall. She nearly could not bring herself to do so—but the other girl rapped out an angry ‘Sheila’ at her and she just faltered it out.”
Michael Stoddart got up and paced up and down. He said:
“You know, I’m not going to lose sight of that girl. I’ve got a pretty sound theory about those adolescent criminal tendencies. If you look into the home life, you nearly always find—”
Poirot interrupted him.
He said:
“Mon cher, I have the deepest respect for your science. I have no doubt that your theories will work admirably where Miss Sheila Kelly is concerned.”
“The others, too.”
“The others, perhaps. It may be. The only one I am sure about is the little Sheila. You will tame her, not a doubt of it! In truth, she eats out of your hand already. . . .”
Flushing, Michael Stoddart said:
“What nonsense you talk, Poirot.”
Forty-seven
THE GIRDLE OF HYPPOLITA
“The Girdle of Hyppolita” was first published in the USA as “The Disappearance of Winnie King” in This Week, September 10, 1939, then as “The Girdle of Hippolyte” in The Strand, July 1940.
One thing leads to another, as Hercule Poirot is fond of saying without much originality.
He adds that this was never more clearly evidenced than in the case of the stolen Rubens.
He was never much interested in the Rubens. For one thing Rubens is not a painter he admires, and then the circumstances of the theft were quite ordinary. He took it up to oblige Alexander Simpson who was by way of being a friend of his and for a certain private reason of his own not unconnected with the classics!
After the theft, Alexander Simpson sent for Poirot and poured out all his woes. The Rubens was a recent discovery, a hitherto unknown masterpiece, but there was no doubt of its authenticity. It had been placed on display at Simpson’s Galleries and it had been stolen in broad daylight. It was at the time when the unemployed were pursuing their tactics of lying down on street crossings and penetrating into the Ritz. A small body of them had entered Simpson’s Galleries and lain down with the slogan displayed of “Art is a Luxury. Feed the Hungry.” The police had been sent for, everyone had crowded round in eager curiosity, and it was not till the demonstrators had been forcibly removed by the arm of the law that it was noticed that the new Rubens had been neatly cut out of its frame and removed also!
“It was quite a small picture, you see,” explained Mr. Simpson. “A man could put it under his arm and walk out while everyone was looking at those miserable idiots of unemployed.”
The men in question, it was discovered, had been paid for their innocent part in the robbery. They were to demonstrate at Simpson’s Galleries. But they had known nothing of the reason until afterwards.
Hercule Poirot thought that it was an amusing trick but did not see what he could do about it. The police, he pointed out, could be trusted to deal with a straightforward robbery.
Alexander Simpson said:
“Listen to me, Poirot. I know who stole the picture and where it is going.”
According to the owner of Simpson’s Galleries it had been stolen by a gang of international crooks on behalf of a certain millionaire who was not above acquiring works of art at a surprisingly low price—and no questions asked! The Rubens, said Simpson, would be smuggled over to France where it would pass into the millionaire’s possession. The English and French police were on the alert, nevertheless Simpson was of the opinion that they would fail. “And once it has passed into this dirty dog’s possession, it’s going to be more difficult. Rich men have to be treated with respect. That’s where you come in. The situation’s going to be delicate. You’re the man for that.”
Finally, without enthusiasm, Hercule Poirot was induced to accept the task. He agreed to depart for France immediately. He was not very interested in his quest, but because of it, he was introduced to the case of the Missing Schoolgirl which interested him very much indeed.
He first heard of it from Chief Inspector Japp who dropped
in to see him just as Poirot was expressing approval of his valet’s packing.
“Ha,” said Japp. “Going to France, aren’t you?”
Poirot said:
“Mon cher, you are incredibly well informed at Scotland Yard.”
Japp chuckled. He said:
“We have our spies! Simpson’s got you on to this Rubens business. Doesn’t trust us, it seems! Well, that’s neither here nor there, but what I want you to do is something quite different. As you’re going to Paris anyway, I thought you might as well kill two birds with one stone. Detective Inspector Hearn’s over there cooperating with the Frenchies—you know Hearn? Good chap—but perhaps not very imaginative. I’d like your opinion on the business.”
“What is this matter of which you speak?”
“Child’s disappeared. It’ll be in the papers this evening. Looks as though she’s been kidnapped. Daughter of a Canon down at Cranchester. King, her name is, Winnie King.”
He proceeded with the story.
Winnie had been on her way to Paris, to join that select and high-class establishment for English and American girls—Miss Pope’s. Winnie had come up from Cranchester by the early train—had been seen across London by a member of Elder Sisters Ltd who undertook such work as seeing girls from one station to another, had been delivered at Victoria to Miss Burshaw, Miss Pope’s second-in-command, and had then, in company with eighteen other girls, left Victoria by the boat train. Nineteen girls had crossed the channel, had passed through the customs at Calais, had got into the Paris train, had lunched in the restaurant car. But when, on the outskirts of Paris, Miss Burshaw had counted heads, it was discovered that only eighteen girls could be found!
“Aha,” Poirot nodded. “Did the train stop anywhere?”
“It stopped at Amiens, but at that time the girls were in the restaurant car and they all say positively that Winnie was with them then. They lost her, so to speak, on the return journey to their compartments. That is to say, she did not enter her own compartment with the other five girls who were in it. They did not suspect anything was wrong, merely thought she was in one of the two other reserved carriages.”