or earlier. Like Bauval’s astronomical data, the evidence had always been

  available but had failed to attract the attention of established

  Egyptologists. The man responsible for bringing it before the public now

  was the American scholar, John Anthony West, who argued that the

  specialists had missed it—not because they had failed to find it, but

  because they had found it and had failed to interpret it properly.9

  West’s evidence focused on certain key structures, notably the Great

  Sphinx and the Valley Temple at Giza and, much farther south, the

  mysterious Osireion at Abydos. He argued that these desert monuments

  showed many scientifically unmistakable signs of having been weathered

  by water, an erosive agent they could only have been exposed to in

  sufficient quantities during the damp ‘pluvial’ period that accompanied

  the end of the last Ice Age around the eleventh millennium BC.10 The

  implication of this peculiar and extremely distinctive pattern of

  ‘precipitation induced’ weathering, was that the Osireion, the Sphinx, and

  6 The Orion Mystery.

  7 Ibid.

  8 Ibid.

  9 Serpent in the Sky, pp. 184-242.

  10 Ibid., 186-7.

  343

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  other associated structures were built before 10,000 BC.11

  A British investigative journalist summed up the effect:

  West is really an academic’s worst nightmare, because here comes somebody way

  out of left-field with a thoroughly well thought out, well presented, coherently

  described theory, full of data they can’t refute, and it pulls the rug out from

  beneath their feet. So how do they deal with it? They ignore it. They hope it’ll go

  away ... and it won’t go away.12

  The reason the new theory would not, under any circumstances, go away,

  despite its rejection by droves of ‘competent Egyptologists’, was that it

  had won widespread support from another scientific branch of

  scholarship—geology. Dr Robert Schoch, a professor of Geology at

  Boston University, had played a prominent role in validating West’s

  estimates concerning the true age of the Sphinx, and his views had been

  endorsed by almost 300 of his peers at the 1992 annual convention of

  the Geological Society of America.13

  Since then, most often out of the public eye, an acrimonious dispute

  had begun to smoulder between the geologists and the Egyptologists.14

  And though very few people other than John West were prepared to say

  as much, what was at stake in this dispute was a complete upheaval in

  accepted views about the evolution of human civilization.

  According to West:

  We are told that the evolution of human civilization is a linear process—that it

  goes from stupid cavemen to smart old us with our hydrogen bombs and striped

  toothpaste. But the proof that the Sphinx is many, many thousands of years older

  than the archaeologists think it is, that it preceded by many thousands of years

  even dynastic Egypt, means that there must have been, at some distant point in

  history, a high and sophisticated civilization—just as all the legends affirm.15

  My own travels and research during the preceding four years had opened

  my eyes to the electrifying possibility that those legends could be true,

  and this was why I had come back to Egypt to meet West and Bauval. I

  was struck by the way in which their hitherto disparate lines of enquiry16

  had converged so convincingly on what appeared to be the astronomical

  and geological fingerprints of a lost civilization, one that might or might

  not have originated in the Nile Valley but that seemed to have had a

  presence here as far back as the eleventh millennium BC.

  11 Ibid.

  12 Mystery of the Sphinx, NBC-TV, 1993.

  13 Conde Nast Traveller, February 1993, p. 176.

  14 E.g, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago, 1992, Debate:

  How Old is the Sphinx?

  15 Mystery of the Sphinx.

  16 John West and Robert Bauval worked in isolation, unaware of each other’s findings,

  until I introduced them.

  344

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  The way of the jackal

  Anubis, guardian of the secrets, god of the funerary chamber, jackalheaded opener of the ways of the dead, guide and companion of Osiris ...

  It was around five o’clock in the afternoon, closing-time at the Cairo

  Museum, when Santha pronounced herself satisfied with her photographs

  of the sinister black effigy. Down below us guards were whistling and

  clapping their hands as they sought to herd the last few sightseers out of

  the halls, but up on the second floor of the hundred-year-old building,

  where ancient Anubis crouched in his millennial watchfulness, all was

  quiet, all was still.

  We left the sombre museum and walked down into the sunlight still

  bathing Cairo’s bustling Tahrir Square.

  Anubis, I reflected, had shared his duties as spirit guide and guardian

  of the secret writings with another god whose type and symbol had also

  been the jackal and whose name, Upuaut, literally meant Opener of the

  Ways.17 Both these canine deities had been linked since time immemorial

  with the ancient town of Abydos in upper Egypt, the original god of

  which, Khenti-Amentiu (the strangely named ‘Foremost of the

  Westerners’) had also been represented as a member of the dog family,

  usually lying recumbent on a black standard.18

  Was there any significance in the repeated recurrence at Abydos of all

  this mythical and symbolic doggishness, with its promise of high secrets

  waiting to unfold? It seemed worthwhile trying to find out since the

  extensive ruins there included the structure known as the Osireion, which

  West’s geological research had indicated might be far older than the

  archaeologists thought. Besides, I had already arranged to meet West in a

  few days in the upper Egyptian town of Luxor, less than 200 kilometres

  south of Abydos. Rather than flying directly to Luxor from Cairo, as I had

  originally planned, I now realized that it would be perfectly feasible to go

  by road and to visit Abydos and a number of other sites along the way.

  Our driver, Mohamed Walili, was waiting for us in an underground carpark just off Tahrir Square. A large genial, elderly man, he owned a

  battered white Peugeot taxi normally to be found standing in the rank

  outside the Mena House hotel at Giza. Over the last few years, on our

  frequent research trips to Cairo, we had struck up a friendship with him

  and he now worked with us whenever we were in Egypt. We haggled for

  some time about the appropriate daily rate for the long return journey to

  Abydos and Luxor. Many matters had to be taken into account, including

  the fact that some of the areas we would be passing through had recently

  been targets of terrorist attacks by Islamic militants. Eventually we agreed

  17 The Gods of the Egyptians, volume II, p. 264.

  18 Blue Guide, Egypt, p. 509; see also From Fetish to God in Ancient Egypt, pp. 211-15;

  Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection, volume I, p. 31ff; The Encyclopaedia of Ancient

  Egypt, p. 197.

/>   345

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  on a price and arranged to set off early the following morning.

  346

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  Chapter 41

  City of the Sun, Chamber of the Jackal

  Mohamed picked us up at our hotel in Heliopolis at 6 a. m. when it was

  still half dark.

  We drank small cups of thick black coffee at a roadside stall and then

  drove west, along dusty streets still almost deserted, towards the River

  Nile. I had asked Mohamed to take us through Maydan al-Massallah

  Square, which was dominated by one of the world’s oldest intact Egyptian

  obelisks.1 Weighing an estimated 350 tons, this was a pink granite

  monolith, 107 feet high, erected by Pharaoh Senuseret I (1971-1928 BC).

  It had originally been one of a pair at the gateway of the great

  Heliopolitan Temple of the Sun. In the 4000 years since then the temple

  itself had entirely vanished, as had the second obelisk. Indeed, almost all

  of ancient Heliopolis had now been obliterated, cannibalized for its

  handsome dressed stones and ready-made building materials by

  countless generations of the citizens of Cairo.2

  Heliopolis (City of the Sun) was referred to in the Bible as On but was

  originally known in the Egyptian language as Innu, or Innu Mehret—

  meaning ‘the pillar’ or ‘the northern pillar’.3 It was a district of immense

  sanctity, associated with a strange group of nine solar and stellar deities,

  and was old beyond reckoning when Senuseret chose it as the site for his

  obelisk. Indeed, together with Giza (and the distant southern city of

  Abydos) Innu/Heliopolis was believed to have been part of the first land

  that emerged from the primeval waters at the moment of creation, the

  land of the ‘First Time’, where the gods had commenced their rule on

  earth.4

  Heliopolitan theology rested on a creation-myth distinguished by a

  number of unique and curious features. It taught that in the beginning

  the universe had been filled with a dark, watery nothingness, called the

  Nun. Out of this inert cosmic ocean (described as ‘shapeless, black with

  the blackness of the blackest night’) rose a mound of dry land on which

  Ra, the Sun God, materialized in his self-created form as Atum

  (sometimes depicted as an old bearded man leaning on a staff):5

  1 ‘Saqqara, Egypt: Archaeologists have discovered a green limestone obelisk, the world’s

  oldest-known complete obelisk, dedicated to Inty, a wife of Pharaoh Pepi I, Egypt’s ruler

  almost 4300 years ago, who was regarded as a goddess after her death.’ Times, London,

  9 May 1992; see also Daily Telegraph, London, 9 May 1992.

  2 Atlas of Ancient Egypt, pp. 173-4; Rosalie and Anthony E. David, A Biographical

  Dictionary of Ancient Egypt, Seaby, London, 1992, pp. 133-4; Blue Guide, Egypt, p. 413.

  3 The Encyclopaedia of Ancient Egypt, p. 110.

  4 George Hart, Egyptian Myths, British Museum Publications, 1990, p. 11.

  5 The Encyclopaedia of Ancient Egypt, p. 110; Traveller’s Key to Ancient Egypt, p. 66;

  347

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  The sky had not been created, the earth had not been created, the children of the

  earth and the reptiles had not been fashioned in that place ... I, Atum, was one by

  myself ... There existed no other who worked with me ...6

  Conscious of being alone, this blessed and immortal being contrived to

  create two divine offspring, Shu, god of the air and dryness, and Tefnut

  the goddess of moisture: ‘I thrust my phallus into my closed hand. I made

  my seed to enter my hand. I poured it into my own mouth. I evacuated

  under the form of Shu, I passed water under the form of Tefnut.’7

  Despite such apparently inauspicious beginnings, Shu and Tefnut (who

  were always described as ‘Twins’ and frequently depicted as lions) grew

  to maturity, copulated and produced offspring of their own: Geb the god

  of the earth and Nut, the goddess of the sky. These two also mated,

  creating Osiris and Isis, Set and Nepthys, and so completed the Ennead,

  the full company of the Nine Gods of Heliopolis. Of the nine, Ra, Shu, Geb

  and Osiris were said to have ruled in Egypt as kings, followed by Horus,

  and lastly—for 3226 years—by the Ibis-headed wisdom god Thoth.8

  Who were these people—or creatures, or beings, or gods? Were they

  figments of the priestly imagination, or symbols, or ciphers? Were the

  stories told about them vivid myth memories of real events which had

  taken place thousands of years previously? Or were they, perhaps, part of

  a coded message from the ancients that had been transmitting itself over

  and over again down the epochs—a message only now beginning to be

  unravelled and understood?

  Such notions seemed fanciful. Nevertheless I could hardly forget that

  out of this very same Heliopolitan tradition the great myth of Isis and

  Osiris had flowed, covertly transmitting an accurate calculus for the rate

  of precessional motion. Moreover the priests of Innu, whose

  responsibility it had been to guard and nurture such traditions, had been

  renowned throughout Egypt for their high wisdom and their proficiency in

  prophecy, astronomy, mathematics, architecture and the magic arts. They

  were also famous for their possession of a powerful and sacred object

  known as the Benben.9

  The Egyptians called Heliopolis Innu, the pillar, because tradition had it

  that the Benben had been kept here in remote pre-dynastic times, when it

  had balanced on top of a pillar of rough-hewn stone.

  The Benben was believed to have fallen from the skies. Unfortunately, it

  had been lost so long before that its appearance was no longer

  From Fetish to God in Ancient Egypt, p. 140.

  6 Papyrus of Nesiamsu, cited in Sacred Science: The King of Pharaonic Theocracy, pp.

  188-9; see also From Fetish to God in Ancient Egypt, pp. 141-3.

  7 From Fetish to God in Ancient Egypt, p. 142. In other readings Shu and Tefnut were

  spat out by Ra-Atum.

  8 New Larousse Encyclopaedia of Mythology, p. 27. The figure 3126 is given in some

  accounts.

  9 The Pyramids: An Enigma Solved, p. 13; C. Jacq, Egyptian Magic, Aris and Phillips,

  Warminster, 1985, p. 8; The Death of Gods in Ancient Egypt, p. 36.

  348

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  remembered by the time Senuseret took the throne in 1971 BC. In that

  period (the Twelfth Dynasty) all that was clearly recalled was that the

  Benben had been pyramidal in form, thus providing (together with the

  pillar on which it stood) a prototype for the shape of all future obelisks.

  The name Benben was likewise applied to the pyramidion, or apex stone,

  usually placed on top of pyramids.10 In a symbolic sense, it was also

  associated closely and directly with Ra-Atum, of whom the ancient texts

  said, ‘You became high on the height; you rose up as the Benben stone in

  the Mansion of the Phoenix ...’11

  Mansion of the Phoenix described the original temple at Heliopolis

  where the Benben had been housed. It reflected the fact that the

  mysterious object had also served as an endurin
g symbol for the mythical

  Phoenix, the divine Bennu bird whose appearances and disappearances

  were believed to be linked to violent cosmic cycles and to the destruction

  and rebirth of world ages.12

  Connections and similarities

  Driving through the suburbs of Heliopolis at around 6:30 in the morning I

  closed my eyes and tried to summon up a picture of the landscape as it

  might have looked in the mythical First Time after the Island of

  Creation13—the primordial mound of Ra-Atum—had risen out of the flood

  waters of the Nun. It was tempting to see a connection between this

  imagery and the Andean traditions that spoke of the emergence of the

  civilizer god Viracocha from the waters of Lake Titicaca after an earthdestroying flood. Moreover there was the figure of Osiris to consider—a

  conspicuously bearded figure, like Viracocha, and like Quetzalcoatl as

  well—remembered for having abolished cannibalism among the

  Egyptians, for having taught them agriculture and animal husbandry, and

  for introducing them to such arts as writing, architecture, and music.14

  The similarities between the Old and New World traditions were hard to

  miss but even harder to interpret. It was possible they were just a series

  of beguiling coincidences. On the other hand, it was possible that they

  might reveal the fingerprints of an ancient and unidentified global

  civilization—fingerprints that were essentially the same whether they

  appeared in the myths of Central America, or of the high Andes, or of

  10 Kingship and the Gods, p. 153.

  11 The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts, p. 246.

  12 For a more detailed discussion see The Orion Mystery, p. 17. Bauval suggests that the

  Benben may have been an oriented meteorite: ‘From depictions it would seem that this

  meteorite was from six to fifteen tons in mass ... the frightful spectacle of its fiery fall

  would have been very impressive ...’, p. 204.

  13 The Penguin Dictionary of Religions, Penguin Books, London, 1988, p. 166.

  14 E.g. The Egyptian Book of the Dead, Introduction, p. XLIX; Qsiris And The Egyptian

  Resurrection, volume II, pp. 1-11.

  349

  Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

  Egypt. The priests of Heliopolis, after all, had taught of the creation, but

  who had taught them? Had they sprung out of nowhere, or was it more