Examination of a large number of these papers shows that, putting aside
   school stories, the favourite subjects are Wild West, Frozen North,
   Foreign Legion, crime (always from the detective's angle), the Great War
   (Air Force or Secret Service, not the infantry), the Tarzan motif in
   varying forms, professional football, tropical exploration, historical
   romance (Robin Hood, Cavaliers and Round-heads, etc.) and scientific
   invention. The Wild West still leads, at any rate as a setting, though
   the Red Indian seems to be fading out. The one theme that is really new
   is the scientific one. Death-rays, Martians, invisible men, robots,
   helicopters and interplanetary rockets figure largely: here and there
   there are even far-off rumours of psychotherapy and ductless glands.
   Whereas the GEM and MAGNET derive from Dickens and Kipling, the WIZARD,
   CHAMPION, MODERN BOY, etc., owe a great deal to H. G. Wells, who, rather
   than Jules Verne, is the father of 'Scientifiction'. Naturally it is the
   magical Martian aspect of science that is most exploited, but one or two
   papers include serious articles on scientific subjects, besides
   quantities of informative snippets. (Examples: 'A Kauri tree in
   Queensland, Australia, is over 12,000 years old'; 'Nearly 50,000
   thunderstorms occur every day'; 'Helium gas costs ?1 per 1000 cubic
   feet'; 'There are over 500 varieties of spiders in Great Britain';
   'London firemen use 14,000,000 gallons of water annually', etc., etc.)
   There is a marked advance in intellectual curiosity and, on the whole, in
   the demand made on the reader's attention. In practice the GEM and MAGNET
   and the post-war papers are read by much the same public, but the mental
   age aimed at seems to have risen by a year or two years--an improvement
   probably corresponding to the improvement in elementary education since
   1909.
   The other thing that has emerged in the post-war boys' papers, though not
   to anything like the extent one would expect, is bully-worship and the
   cult of violence.
   If one compares the GEM and MAGNET with a genuinely modern paper, the
   thing that immediately strikes one is the absence of the leader-principle.
   There is no central dominating character; instead there are fifteen
   or twenty characters, all more or less on an equality, with whom
   readers of different types can identify. In the more modern papers
   this is not usually the case. Instead of identifying with a schoolboy of
   more or less his own age, the reader of the SKIPPER, HOTSPUR, etc., is
   led to identify with a G-man, with a Foreign Legionary, with some variant
   of Tarzan, with an air ace, a master spy, an explorer, a pugilist--at
   any rate with some single all-powerful character who dominates everyone
   about him and whose usual method of solving any problem is a sock on the
   jaw. This character is intended as a superman, and as physical strength
   is the form of power that boys can best understand, he is usually a sort
   of human gorilla; in the Tarzan type of story he is sometimes actually a
   giant, eight or ten feet high. At the same time the scenes of violence in
   nearly all these stories are remarkably harmless and unconvincing. There
   is a great difference in tone between even the most bloodthirsty English
   paper and the threepenny Yank Mags, FIGHT STORIES, ACTION STORIES, etc.
   (not strictly boys' papers, but largely read by boys). In the Yank Mags
   you get real blood-lust, really gory descriptions of the all-in,
   jump-on-his-testicles style fighting, written in a jargon that has been
   perfected by people who brood endlessly on violence. A paper like FIGHT
   STORIES, for instance, would have very little appeal except to sadists
   and masochists. You can see the comparative gentleness of the English
   civilization by the amateurish way in which prize-fighting is always
   described in the boys' weeklies. There is no specialized vocabulary. Look
   at these four extracts, two English, two American;
   When the gong sounded, both men were breathing heavily and each had great
   red marks on his chest. Bill's chin was bleeding, and Ben had a cut over
   his right eye.
   Into their corners they sank, but when the gong clanged again they were
   up swiftly, and they went like tigers at each other. (ROVER)
   * * *
   He walked in stolidly and smashed a clublike right to my face. Blood
   spattered and I went back on my heels, but surged in and ripped my right
   under the heart. Another right smashed full on Ben's already battered
   mouth, and, spitting out the fragments of a tooth, he crashed a flailing
   left to my body. (FIGHT STORIES)
   * * *
   It was amazing to watch the Black Panther at work. His muscles rippled
   and slid under his dark skin. There was all the power and grace of a
   giant cat in his swift and terrible onslaught.
   He volleyed blows with a bewildering speed for so huge a fellow. In a
   moment Ben was simply blocking with his gloves as well as he could. Ben
   was really a past-master of defence. He had many fine victories behind
   him. But the Negro's rights and lefts crashed through openings that
   hardly any other fighter could have found. (WIZARD)
   * * *
   Haymakers which packed the bludgeoning weight of forest monarchs crashing
   down under the ax hurled into the bodies of the two heavies as they
   swapped punches. (FIGHT STORIES)
   Notice how much more knowledgeable the American extracts sound. They are
   written for devotees of the prize-ring, the others are not. Also, it
   ought to be emphasized that on its level the moral code of the English
   boys' papers is a decent one. Crime and dishonesty are never held up to
   admiration, there is none of the cynicism and corruption of the American
   gangster story. The huge sale of the Yank Mags in England shows that
   there is a demand for that kind of thing, but very few English writers
   seem able to produce it. When hatred of Hitler became a major emotion in
   America, it was interesting to see how promptly 'anti-Fascism' was
   adapted to pornographic purposes by the editors of the Yank Mags. One
   magazine which I have in front of me is given up to a long, complete
   story, 'When Hell Game to America', in which the agents of a
   'blood-maddened European dictator' are trying to conquer the U.S.A. with
   death-rays and invisible aeroplanes. There is the frankest appeal to
   sadism, scenes in which the Nazis tie bombs to women's backs and fling
   them off heights to watch them blown to pieces in mid-air, others in
   which they tie naked girls together by their hair and prod them with
   knives to make them dance, etc., etc. The editor comments solemnly on all
   this, and uses it as a plea for tightening up restrictions against
   immigrants. On another page of the same paper: 'LIVES OF THE HOTCHA
   CHORUS GIRLS. Reveals all the intimate secrets and fascinating pastimes
   of the famous Broadway Hotcha girls. NOTHING IS OMITTED. Price 10c.' 'HOW
   TO LOVE. 10c.' 'FRENCH PHOTO RING. 25c.' 'NAUGHTY NUDIES TRANSFERS. From
   the outside of the glass you see a beautiful girl, innocently dressed.
   Turn it around and look through the glass and oh! what a difference! Se 
					     					 			t
   of 3 transfers 25c.,' etc., etc., etc. There is nothing at all like this
   in any English paper likely to be read by boys. But the process of
   Americanization is going on all the same. The American ideal, the
   'he-man', the 'tough guy', the gorilla who puts everything right by
   socking everybody on the jaw, now figures in probably a majority of boys'
   papers. In one serial now running in the SKIPPER he is always portrayed
   ominously enough, swinging a rubber truncheon.
   The development of the WIZARD, HOTSPUR, etc., as against the earlier
   boys' papers, boils down to this: better technique, more scientific
   interest, more bloodshed, more leader-worship. But, after all, it is the
   LACK of development that is the really striking thing.
   To begin with, there is no political development whatever. The world of
   the SKIPPER and the CHAMPION is still the pre-1914 world of the MAGNET
   and the GEM. The Wild West story, for instance, with its cattle-rustlers,
   lynch-law and other paraphernalia belonging to the eighties, is a
   curiously archaic thing. It is worth noticing that in papers of this type
   it is always taken for granted that adventures only happen at the ends of
   the earth, in tropical forests, in Arctic wastes, in African deserts, on
   Western prairies, in Chinese opium dens--everywhere in fact, except the
   places where things really DO happen. That is a belief dating from thirty
   or forty years ago, when the new continents were in process of being
   opened up. Nowadays, of course, if you really want adventure, the place
   to look for it is in Europe. But apart from the picturesque side of the
   Great War, contemporary history is carefully excluded. And except that
   Americans are now admired instead of being laughed at, foreigners are
   exactly the same figures of fun that they always were. If a Chinese
   character appears, he is still the sinister pigtailed opium-smuggler of
   Sax Rohmer; no indication that things have been happening in China since
   1912--no indication that a war is going on there, for instance. If a
   Spaniard appears, he is still a 'dago' or 'greaser' who rolls cigarettes
   and stabs people in the back; no indication that things have been
   happening in Spain. Hitler and the Nazis have not yet appeared, or are
   barely making their appearance. There will be plenty about them in a
   little while, but it will be from a strictly patriotic angle (Britain
   versus Germany), with the real meaning of the struggle kept out of sight
   as much as possible. As for the Russian Revolution, it is extremely
   difficult to find any reference to it in any of these papers. When Russia
   is mentioned at all it is usually in an information snippet (example:
   'There are 29,000 centenarians in the USSR.'), and any reference to
   the Revolution is indirect and twenty years out of date. In one story in
   the ROVER, for instance, somebody has a tame bear, and as it is a Russian
   bear, it is nicknamed Trotsky--obviously an echo of the 1917-23 period
   and not of recent controversies. The clock has stopped at 1910. Britannia
   rules the waves, and no one has heard of slumps, booms, unemployment,
   dictatorships, purges or concentration camps.
   And in social outlook there is hardly any advance. The snobbishness is
   somewhat less open than in the GEM and MAGNET--that is the most one can
   possibly say. To begin with, the school story, always partly dependent on
   snob-appeal, is by no means eliminated. Every number of a boys' paper
   includes at least one school story, these stories slightly outnumbering
   the Wild Westerns. The very elaborate fantasy-life of the GEM and MAGNET
   is not imitated and there is more emphasis on extraneous adventure, but
   the social atmosphere (old grey stones) is much the same. When a new
   school is introduced at the beginning of a story we are often told in
   just those words that 'it was a very posh school'. From time to time a
   story appears which is ostensibly directed AGAINST snobbery. The
   scholarship-boy (cf. Tom Redwing in the MAGNET) makes fairly frequent
   appearances, and what is essentially the same theme is sometimes
   presented in this form: there is great rivalry between two schools, one
   of which considers itself more 'posh' than the other, and there are
   fights, practical jokes, football matches, etc., always ending in the
   discomfiture of the snobs. If one glances very superficially at some of
   these stories it is possible to imagine that a democratic spirit has
   crept into the boys' weeklies, but when one looks more closely one sees
   that they merely reflect the bitter jealousies that exist within the
   white-collar class. Their real function is to allow the boy who goes to a
   cheap private school (NOT a Council school) to feel that his school is
   just as 'posh' in the sight of God as Winchester or Eton. The sentiment
   of school loyalty ('We're better than the fellows down the road'), a
   thing almost unknown to the real working class, is still kept up. As
   these stories are written by many different hands, they do, of course,
   vary a good deal in tone. Some are reasonably free from snobbishness, in
   others money and pedigree are exploited even more shamelessly than in the
   GEM and MAGNET. In one that I came across an actual MAJORITY of the boys
   mentioned were titled.
   Where working-class characters appear, it is usually either as comics
   (jokes about tramps, convicts, etc.), or as prize-fighters, acrobats,
   cowboys, professional footballers and Foreign Legionaries--in other
   words, as adventurers. There is no facing of the facts about
   working-class life, or, indeed, about WORKING life of any description.
   Very occasionally one may come across a realistic description of, say,
   work in a coal-mine, but in all probability it will only be there as the
   background of some lurid adventure. In any case the central character is
   not likely to be a coal-miner. Nearly all the time the boy who reads
   these papers--in nine cases out often a boy who is going to spend his
   life working in a shop, in a factory or in some subordinate job in an
   office--is led to identify with people in positions of command, above
   all with people who are never troubled by shortage of money. The Lord
   Peter Wimsey figure, the seeming idiot who drawls and wears a monocle but
   is always to the fore in moments of danger, turns up over and over again.
   (This character is a great favourite in Secret Service stories.) And, as
   usual, the heroic characters all have to talk B.B.C.; they may talk
   Scottish or Irish or American, but no one in a star part is ever
   permitted to drop an aitch. Here it is worth comparing the social
   atmosphere of the boys' weeklies with that of the women's weeklies, the
   ORACLE, the FAMILY STAR, PEG'S PAPER, etc.
   The women's papers are aimed at an older public and are read for the most
   part by girls who are working for a living. Consequently they are on the
   surface much more realistic. It is taken for granted, for example, that
   nearly everyone has to live in a big town and work at a more or less dull
   job. Sex, so far from being taboo, is THE subject. The short, complete
   stories, the special feature of these papers, are ge 
					     					 			nerally of the 'came
   the dawn' type: the heroine narrowly escapes losing her 'boy' to a
   designing rival, or the 'boy' loses his job and has to postpone marriage,
   but presently gets a better job. The changeling-fantasy (a girl brought
   up in a poor home is 'really' the child of rich parents) is another
   favourite. Where sensationalism comes in, usually in the serials, it
   arises out of the more domestic type of crime, such as bigamy, forgery or
   sometimes murder; no Martians, death-rays or international anarchist
   gangs. These papers are at any rate aiming at credibility, and they have
   a link with real life in their correspondence columns, where genuine
   problems are being discussed. Ruby M. Ayres's column of advice in the
   ORACLE, for instance, is extremely sensible and well written. And yet the
   world of the ORACLE and PEG'S PAPER is a pure fantasy-world. It is the
   same fantasy all the time; pretending to be richer than you are. The
   chief impression that one carries away from almost every story in these
   papers is of a frightful, overwhelming 'refinement'. Ostensibly the
   characters are working-class people, but their habits, the interiors of
   their houses, their clothes, their outlook and, above all, their speech
   arc entirely middle class. They are all living at several pounds a week
   above their income. And needless to say, that is just the impression that
   is intended. The idea is to give the bored factory-girl or worn-out
   mother of five a dream-life in which she pictures herself--not actually
   as a duchess (that convention has gone out) but as, say, the wife of a
   bank-manager. Not only is a five-to-six-pound-a-week standard of life set
   up as the ideal, but it is tacitly assumed that that is how working-class
   people really DO live. The major facts arc simply not faced. It is
   admitted, for instance, that people sometimes lose their jobs; but then
   the dark clouds roll away and they get better jobs instead. No mention of
   un-employment as something permanent and inevitable, no mention of the
   dole, no mention of trade unionism. No suggestion anywhere that there can
   be anything wrong with the system AS A SYSTEM; there arc only individual
   misfortunes, which are generally due to somebody's wickedness and can in
   any case be put right in the last chapter. Always the dark clouds roll
   away, the kind employer raises Alfred's wages, and there are jobs for
   everybody except the drunks. It is still the world of the WIZARD and the
   GEM, except that there are orange-blossoms instead of machine-guns.
   The outlook inculcated by all these papers is that of a rather
   exceptionally stupid member of the Navy League in the year 1910. Yes, it
   may be said, but what does it matter? And in any case, what else do you
   expect?
   Of course no one in his senses would want to turn the so-called penny
   dreadful into a realistic novel or a Socialist tract. An adventure story
   must of its nature be more or less remote from real life. But, as I have
   tried to make clear, the unreality of the WIZARD and the GEM is not so
   artless as it looks. These papers exist because of a specialized demand,
   because boys at certain ages find it necessary to read about Martians,
   death-rays, grizzly bears and gangsters. They get what they are looking
   for, but they get it wrapped up in the illusions which their future
   employers think suitable for them. To what extent people draw their ideas
   from fiction is disputable. Personally I believe that most people are
   influenced far more than they would care to admit by novels, serial
   stories, films and so forth, and that from this point of view the worst
   books are often the most important, because they are usually the ones
   that are read earliest in life. It is probable that many people who would
   consider themselves extremely sophisticated and 'advanced' are actually
   carrying through life an imaginative background which they acquired in
   childhood from (for instance) Sapper and Ian Hay. If that is so, the