'Come, come,' said Philip. 'The picture's a little lurid. And anyhow, even if it were accurate, the highbrows can't be held responsible for the applications other people have made of their results.'
'They are responsible. Because they brought the other people up in their own damned intellectualist tradition. After all, the other people are only highbrows on another plane. A business man is just a man of science who happens to be rather stupider than the real man of science. He's living just as one-sidedly and intellectually, as far as his intellect goes, as the other one, And the fruit of that is inner psychological degeneration. For of course,' he added parenthetically, 'the fruits of your amusements aren't merely the external apparatus of modern industrial life. They're an inward decay; they're infantilism and degeneracy and all sorts of madness and primitive reversion. No, no, I have no patience with your precious amusements of the mind. You'd be doing far less harm if you were playing golf.'
'But truth?' queried Burlap, who had been listening to the discussion without speaking. 'What about truth?
Spandrell nodded approval. 'Isn't that worth looking for?'
'Certainly,' said Rampion. 'But not where Philip and his scientific and scholarly friends are looking for it. After all, the only truth that can be of any interest to us, or that we can know, is a human truth. And to discover that, you must look for it with the whole being, not with a specialized part of it. What the scientists are trying to get at is nonhuman truth. Not that they can ever completely succeed; for not even a scientist can completely cease to be human. But they can go some way towards abstracting themselves from the human world of reality. By torturing their brains they can get a faint notion of the universe as it would seem if looked at through nonhuman eyes. What with their quantum theory, wave mechanics, relativity and all the rest of it, they do really seem to have got a little way outside humanity. Well, what the devil's the good of that?'
'Apart from the fun of the thing,' said Philip, 'the good may be some astonishing practical discovery, like the secret of disintegrating the atom and the liberation of endless supplies of energy.'
'And the consequent reduction of human beings to absolute imbecility and absolute subservience to their machines,' jeered Rampion. 'I know your paradises. But the point for the moment is truth. This nonhuman truth that the scientists are trying to get at with their intellects--it's utterly irrelevant to ordinary human living. Our truth, the relevant human truth is something you discover by living--living completely, with the whole man. The results of your amusements, Philip, all these famous theories about the cosmos and their practical applications--they've got nothing whatever to do with the only truth that matters. And the nonhuman truth isn't merely irrelevant; it's dangerous. It distracts people's attention from the important human truth. It makes them falsify their experience in order that lived reality may fit in with abstract theory. For example, it's an established nonhuman truth--or at least it was established in my young days--that secondary qualities have no real existence. The man who takes that seriously denies himself, destroys the whole fabric of his life as a human being. For human beings happen to be so arranged that secondary qualities are, for them, the only real ones. Deny them and you commit suicide.'
'But in practice,' said Philip, 'nobody does deny them.'
'Not completely,' Rampion agreed. 'Because it can't be done. A man can't abolish his sensations and feelings completely without physically killing himself. But he can disparage them after the event. And, in fact, that's what a great number of intelligent and welleducated people do--disparage the human in the interests of the nonhuman. Their motive's different from that of the Christians; but the result's the same. A sort of self-destruction. Always the same,' he went on with a sudden outburst of anger in his voice. 'Every attempt at being something better than a man--the result's always the same. Death, some sort of death. You try to be more than you are by nature and you kill something in yourself and become much less. I'm so tired of all this rubbish about the higher life and moral and intellectual progress and living for ideals and all the rest of it. It all leads to death. Just as surely as living for money. Christians and moralists and cultured aesthetes, and bright young scientists and Smilesian business men--all the poor little human frogs trying to blow themselves up into bulls of pure spirituality, pure idealism, pure efficiency, pure conscious intelligence, and just going pop, ceasing to be anything but the fragments of a little frog--decaying fragments at that. The whole thing's a huge stupidity, a huge disgusting lie. Your little stink-pot of a St. Francis, for example.' He turned to Burlap, who protested. 'Just a little stink-pot,' Rampion insisted. 'A silly vain little man trying to blow himself up into a Jesus and only succeeding in killing whatever sense or decency there was in him, only succeeding in turning himself into the nasty smelly fragments of a real human being. Going about getting thrills of excitement out of licking lepers! Ugh! The disgusting little pervert! He thinks himself too good to kiss a woman; he wants to be above anything so vulgar as natural healthy pleasure, and the only result is that he kills whatever core of human decency he ever had in him and becomes a smelly little pervert who can only get a thrill out of licking lepers' ulcers. Not curing the lepers, mind you. Just licking them. For his own amusement. Not theirs. It's revolting!'
Philip leaned back in his chair and laughed. But Rampion turned on him in a fury.
'You may laugh,' he said.
'But don't imagine you're any better, really. You and your intellectual, scientific friends. You've killed just as much of yourselves as the Christian maniacs. Shall I read you your programme?' He picked up the book that was lying beside him on the table and began to turn the pages. 'I came upon it just now, as I was coming here in the 'bus. Here we are.' He began to read, pronouncing the French words carefully and clearly. 'Plus un obstacle materiel toutes les rapidites gagnees par la science et la richesse. Pas une tare a l'independance. Voir un crime de lese-moi dans toute frequentation, homme ou pays, qui ne serait pas expressement voulu. L'energie, le recueillement, la tension de la solitude, les transporter dans ses rapports avec de vrais semblables. Pas d'amour peut-etre, mais des amities rares, difficiles, exaltees, nerveuses; vivre comme on revivrait en esprit de detachement, d'inquietude et de revanche.' Rampion closed the book and looked up. 'That's your programme,' he said to Philip. 'Formulated by Marie Leneru in 1901. Very brief and neat and complete. And, my God, what a horror! No body, no contact with the material world, no contact with human beings except through the intellect, no love...'
'We've changed that a little since 1901,' said Philip, smiling.
'Not really. You've admitted promiscuous fornication, that's all. But not love, not the natural contact and flow, not* the renunciation of mental selfconsciousness, not the abandonment to instinct. No, no. You stick to your conscious will. Everything must be expressement voulu, all the time. And the connections must be purely mental. And life must be lived, not as though it were life in a world of living people, but as though it were solitary recollection and fancy and meditation. An endless masturbation, like Proust's horrible great book. That's the higher life. Which is the euphemistic name of incipient death. It's significant, it's symbolic that that Leneru woman was deaf and purblind. The outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual truth. Poor creature! She had some excuse for spirituality. But the other HigherLifers, the ones who haven't any physical defect--they're not so forgivable. They've maimed themselves deliberately, for fun. It's a pity they don't develop visible hunch-backs or wall-eyes. One would know better who one was dealing with.'
'Quite,' said Philip, nodding, and laughed with an affectation of amusement that was meant to cover the embarrassment he felt at Rampion's references to physical disability. 'Quite.' Nobody should think that, because he had a game leg, he didn't entirely appreciate the justice of Rampion's remarks about deformity.
The irrelevant loudness of his laugh made Rampion glance questioningly at him. What was up? He couldn't be bothered to discover.
'It's all a damned lie,' he went on, 'and an idiotic lie at that--all this pretending to be more than human. Idiotic because it never comes off. You try to be more than human, but you only succeed in making yourself less than human. Always...'
'Hear, hear!' said Philip. '"We walk on earth and have no need of wings."' And suddenly he heard his father's loud voice saying, 'I had wings. I had wings'; he saw his flushed face and feverishly pink pyjamas. Ludicrous and deplorable. 'Do you know who that's by?' he went on. 'That's the last line of the poem I wrote for the Newdigate prize at Oxford, when I was twenty-one. The subject was "King Arthur," if I remember rightly. Needless to say I didn't get the prize. But it's a good line.'
'A pity you didn't live up to it,' said Rampion, 'instead of whoring after abstractions. But of course, there's nobody like the lover of abstraction for denouncing abstractions. He knows by experience how lifedestroying they are. The ordinary man can afford to take them in his stride. He can afford to have wings too, so long as he also remembers that he's got feet. It's when people strain themselves to fly all the time that they go wrong. They're ambitious of being angels; but all they succeed in being is either cuckoos and geese on the one hand or else disgusting vultures and carrion crows on the other.'
'But all this,' said Spandrell, breaking a long silence, 'is just the gospel of animalism. You're just advising us to behave like beasts.'
'I'm advising you to behave like human beings,' said Rampion. 'Which is slightly different. And anyhow,' he added, 'it's a damned sight better to behave like a beast--a real genuine undomesticated animal, I mean--than to invent a devil and then behave like one's invention.'
There was a brief silence.'suppose I were to tell them,' Spandrell was thinking,'suppose I were to tell them that I'd just jumped out on a man from behind a screen and hit him on the side of the head with an Indian club.' He took another sip of brandy. 'No,' he said aloud, 'I'm not so sure of what you say. Behaving like an animal is behaving like a creature that's below good and evil. You must know what good is before you can start behaving like the devil.' And yet it had all been just stupid and sordid and disgusting. Yes, and profoundly silly, an enormous stupidity. At the core of the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil he had found, not fire and poison, but only a brown disgusting putrefaction and a few small maggots. 'Things exist only in terms of their opposites,' he went on, frowning at his own thoughts. 'The devil implies God.'
'No doubt,' said Rampion impatiently. 'A devil of absolute evil implies a God of absolute good. Well, what of it? What's that got to do with you or me?'
'A good deal, I should have thought.'
'It's got about as much to do with us as the fact of this table being made of electrons, or an infinite series of waves undulating in an unknown medium, or a large number of point-events in a four-dimensional continuum, or whatever else Philip's scientific friends assure us it is made of. As much as that. That is to say, practically nothing. Your absolute God and absolute devil belong to the class of irrelevant nonhuman facts. The only things that concern us are the little relative gods and devils of history and geography, the little relative goods and evils of individual casuistry. Everything else is nonhuman and beside the point; and if you allow yourself to be influenced by nonhuman, absolute considerations, then you inevitably make either a fool of yourself, or a villain, or perhaps both.'
'But that's better than making an animal of oneself,' insisted Spandrell. 'I'd rather be a fool or a villain than a bull or a dog.'
'But nobody's asking you to be a bull or a dog,' said Rampion impatiently. 'Nobody's asking you to be anything but a man. A man, mind you. Not an angel or a devil. A man's a creature on a tight-rope, walking delicately, equilibrated, with mind and consciousness and spirit at one end of his balancing pole and body and instinct and all that's unconscious and earthy and mysterious at the other. Balanced. Which is damnably difficult. And the only absolute he can ever really know is the absolute of perfect balance. The absoluteness of perfect relativity. Which is a paradox and nonsense intellectually. But so is all real, genuine, living truth--just nonsense according to logic. And logic is just nonsense in the light of living truth. You can choose which you like, logic or life. It's a matter of taste. Some people prefer being dead.'
'Prefer being dead.' The words went echoing through Spandrell's mind. Everard Webley lying on the floor, trussed up like a chicken. Did he prefer being dead? 'All the same,' he said slowly,'some things must always remain absolutely and radically wrong. Killing, for example.' He wanted to believe that it was more than merely low and sordid and disgusting. He wanted to believe that it was also terrible and tragic. 'That's an absolute wrong.'
'But why more absolute than anything else?' said Rampion. 'There are circumstances when killing's obviously necessary and right and commendable. The only absolutely evil act, so far as I can see, that a man can perform, is an act against life, against his own integrity. He does wrong if he perverts himself, if he falsifies his instincts.'
Spandrell was sarcastic. 'We're getting back to the' beasts again,' he said. 'Go ravening round fulfilling all your appetites as you feel them. Is that the last word in human wisdom?'
'Well, it isn't really so stupid as you try to make out,' said Rampion. 'If men went about satisfying their instinctive desires only when they genuinely felt them, like the animals you're so contemptuous of, they'd behave a damned sight better than the majority of civilized human beings behave to-day. It isn't natural appetite and spontaneous instinctive desire that make men so beastly--no, "beastly" is the wrong word; it implies an insult to the animals--so all-too-humanly bad and vicious, then. It's the imagination, it's the intellect, its principles, its tradition and education. Leave the instincts to themselves and they'll do very little mischief. If men made love only when they were carried away by passion, if they fought only when they were angry or terrified, if they grabbed at property only when they had need or were swept off their feet by an uncontrollable desire for possession--why, I assure you, this world would be a great deal more like the Kingdom of Heaven than it is under our present Christian-intellectual-scientific dispensation. It's not instinct that makes Casanovas and Byrons and Lady Castlemaines; it's a prurient imagination artificially tickling up the appetite, tickling up desires that have no natural existence. If Don Juans and Don Juanesses only obeyed their desires, they'd have very few affairs. They have to tickle themselves up imaginatively before they can start being casually promiscuous. And it's the same with the other instincts. It's not the possessive instinct that's made modem civilization insane about money. The possessive instinct has to be kept artificially tickled by education and tradition and moral principles. The money-grubbers have to be told that money-grubbing's natural and noble, that thrift and industry are virtues, that persuading people to buy things they don't want is Christian Service. Their possessive instinct would never be strong enough to keep them grubbing away from morning till night all through a lifetime. It has to be kept chronically gingered up by the imagination and the intellect. And then, think of civilized war. It's got nothing to do with spontaneous combativeness. Men have to be compelled by law and then tickled up by propaganda before they'll fight. You'd do more for peace by telling men to obey the spontaneous dictates of their fighting instincts than by founding any number of Leagues of Nations.'
'You'd do still more,' said Burlap, 'by telling them to obey Jesus.'
'No, you wouldn't. Telling them to obey Jesus is telling them to be more than human. And, in practice, trying to be more than human always means succeeding in being less than human. Telling men to obey Jesus literally is telling them, indirectly, to behave like idiots and finally like devils. Just consider the examples. Old Tolstoy--a great man who deliberately turned himself into an idiot by trying to be more than a great man. Your horrid little St. Francis.' He turned to Burlap.
'Another idiot. But already on the verge of diabolism. With the monks of Thebaid you see the process carried a step further. They went over the verg
e. They got to the stage of being devils. Self-torture, destruction of everything decent and beautiful and living. That was their programme. They tried to obey Jesus and be more than men; and all they succeeded in doing was to become the incarnation of pure diabolic destructiveness. They could have been perfectly decent human beings if they'd just gone about behaving naturally, in accordance with their instincts. But no, they wanted to be more than human. So they just became devils. Idiots first and then devils, imbecile devils. Ugh! ' Rampion made a grimace and shook his head with disgust. 'And to think,' he went on indignantly, 'that the world's full of these creatures! Not quite so far gone as St. Anthony and his demons or St. Francis and his halfwits. But of the same kind. Different only in degree. And all perverted in the same wayby trying to be nonhuman. Nonhumanly religious, nonhumanly moral, nonhumanly intellectual and scientific, nonhumanly specialized and efficient, nonhumanly the business man, nonhumanly avaricious and property-loving, nonhumanly lascivious and Don Juanesque, nonhumanly the conscious individual even in love. All perverts. Perverted towards goodness or badness, towards spirit or flesh; but always away from the central norm, always away from humanity. The world's an asylum of perverts. There are four of them at this table now.' He looked round with a grin. 'A pure little Jesus pervert.' Burlap forgivingly smiled. 'An intellectual-aesthetic pervert.' 'Thanks for the compliment,' said Philip.
'A morality-philosophy pervert.' He turned to Spandrell. 'Quite the little Stavrogin. Pardon my saying so, Spandrell; but you really are the most colossal fool.' He looked intently into his face.
'Smiling like all the tragic characters of fiction rolled into one! But it won't do. It doesn't conceal the simple-minded zany underneath.' Spandrell threw back his head and noiselessly laughed. If he knew, he was thinking, if he knew... But if he knew, would he think him any less of a fool?