BOOKS BOUGHT:
★ The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks – Rebecca Skloot
★ The Last Englishman: The Double Life of Arthur Ransome – Roland Chambers
BOOKS READ:
★ Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime – John Heilemann and Mark Halperin
★ The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks – Rebecca Skloot
In April 2010, I was a tragic victim of the volcanic ash cloud that grounded all flights into, out of and across Europe for a few days. I am sure that other people have hard-luck stories, too: weddings, births and funerals were missed, job opportunities went begging, feckless husbands given one last chance got home to find their underwear strewn across the street, and so on. Mine, however, was perhaps more poignant than any of them: my family, stranded in Tenerife, was unable to celebrate my fifty-third birthday with me. Can you imagine? Of all the birthdays to miss, it had to be the one I was looking forward to the most. All my life I had wondered what it would be like to turn fifty-three, to open presents suitable for a fifty-three-year-old – something from the excellent Bald Guyz1 range of beauty products, for example, or a Bruce Springsteen box set – while an adoring family looked on. Well, my adoring family was stranded on an island in the Mediterranean, in a hotel that apparently laid on a chocolate fountain for breakfast. When they eventually made it home, my birthday was clearly an event to be celebrated when it came around again in 2011, rather than retrospectively. I have therefore decided, perhaps understandably, that this April I will be turning fifty-three again. It’s not a vanity thing; it’s simply that I’m owed a birthday.
Back in 2010, I had to make do with the cards I’d been dealt, and the cards were these: a small group of friends bought me champagne, which we drank in my garden on a beautiful spring evening, at a time when I would usually be embarking on some terrible, strength-sapping, pointless fight about, say, shampoo and/or bedtime; the same friends then took me to a favourite local restaurant and gave me presents. You can see why I might feel bitter even to this day.
Three of the presents my friends had bought me were book-shaped; and, miraculously, given the lack of deferred gratification in my book-buying life, I wanted to read them all and didn’t own any of them. I got a lovely first edition of Mordecai Richler’s The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz, a copy of Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, and Marc Norman’s history of screenwriting, What Happens Next. Is it too late and too hurtful to say that my fifty-third birthday was perhaps the best ever?
Several months later, and I have finally read one of the three, even though I wanted to read all three of them immediately. (What happened in between? Other books, is what happened. Other books, other moods, other obligations, other appetites, other reading journeys.) Game Change, as you may or may not know, is about the 2008 election in the USA, and appeared in a couple of the best-of-year lists here in the UK, so I was reminded that I owned it; when I read it, I was reminded that politicians are unlike anyone I have ever met in my life.
Maybe some of you know politicians. Maybe you hang out with them, went to school with them, exchange Christmas cards with them. I’m guessing not, though. Politicians tend not to hang out with people like you, almost by definition. Typically, someone interested enough in the arts to be reading the Believer has spent a lot of time doing things that disqualify you not only from a career in politics, but from even knowing people who have a career in politics. While you were smoking weed, sleeping around, listening to Pavement, reading novels, watching old movies and generally pissing away every educational opportunity ever given to you, they were knocking on doors, joining societies, reading the Economist, and being very, very careful about avoiding people and situations that might embarrass them later. They are the people who were knocking on your door five minutes after you arrived at college, asking for your vote in the forthcoming student-representative election; you thought they were creeps, and laughed at them behind their backs. Meanwhile, they thought you were unserious and unfocused, and patronized you irritatingly if you ever had cause to be in the same room. I hope that, however old you are, you have already done enough to kill any serious political ambition. If you haven’t wasted huge chunks of your life on art, booze and soft drugs, then you’ve wasted huge chunks of your life, and we don’t want you around here. Go away.
Many of the characters in Game Change are quite clearly creeps. They are not portrayed as creeps, for the most part. John Heilemann and Mark Halperin obviously like the people who want to govern us, and their book, which is an unavoidable, enthralling mix of the gossipy and the profoundly significant, reflects this affection. And yet I defy anyone from around these parts to read this book without thinking, over and over again, ‘Who are these people?’ There’s John Edwards, of course, whose affair with the extraordinary Rielle Hunter was conducted more or less entirely in full view of an increasingly incredulous staff; when Edwards eventually realized the damage he had done to himself and his campaign, he lambasted a young staffer because he didn’t come to his boss ‘like a fucking man and tell me to stop fucking her’. But there are plenty of other strange people, too – people who don’t really seem to believe anything, but who are desperately anxious to know what the country wants to hear them saying.
Obama is different, of course, but it’s still very difficult to fathom why anyone would want to become a world leader. It’s really not a nice job. For $400,000 a year, plus an entertainment budget of $19,000 – although I would imagine very little of that can go on CDs, books and cinema tickets – you give up safety, family life, social life, sleep, a significant proportion of your sanity and the esteem of approximately two in every three of your fellow citizens. I am not being flippant: this is an intolerable prospect, for anyone with any sense of an inner life. This means that the people who want to represent us are actually the least representative people in the world.
Here in Europe, we still love Obama. But right at the beginning of Game Change, when Halperin and Heilemann are describing his relationship with Hillary Clinton, there is a line intended to convey how close the two were, once upon a time, but that serves only to make you wonder about politicians as a species: ‘At one point, Obama gave her a gift: a photograph of him, Michelle, and their two young daughters, Sasha and Malia.’ So, hold on … Hillary was Barack’s mother? Because if she wasn’t, why on earth would he give her a picture of himself and his kids? Would you do that with someone you knew professionally? ‘Here’s a framed picture of me. Put it up anywhere in your house. It doesn’t have to be on your mantel-piece. Or put it up in your office, on the half a shelf you have available for photos of your loved ones.’ Try it, and see how often you’re invited to after-work drinks.
Game Change isn’t the book I thought it would be, perhaps because the nomination race and the presidential campaign were not what they looked like from across the Atlantic. I was expecting a thrilling and inspirational story, full of goodies and baddies, dizzying highs and dispiriting lows; instead, Heilemann and Halperin describe a long, strength-sapping and bitter trudge to victory. Much of the book is taken up with the inevitability of Clinton’s defeat, and her refusal to acknowledge it, while Obama waits with weary impatience. And the fight between Obama and McCain is a non-event once Sarah Palin joins in and makes the sides uneven. This is not to say that Game Change is dull. It isn’t, because every page feels like the truth. It’s just that the truth isn’t as uplifting as you want to believe.
It was the holiday season here in the UK, which explains the brevity of the ‘Books Read’ list: my intellectual life is utterly dependent on my children attending school. The holiday season doesn’t explain why I didn’t pick up any fiction, nor does it explain why I should choose to spend all my available reading time on the unpromising subjects of American politics and cancer cells. I will only regret it if Game Change and The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks turn o
ut to be the last two books I ever read, because I don’t think they illustrate the breathtaking range of my literary tastes. They make me look like the kind of non-fiction guy I meet on planes during book tours. ‘Should I have heard of you? See, I don’t read many novels. I like to learn something I didn’t know already.’ At the time of writing I am halfway through a short and very beautiful YA novel, the completion of which should recomplicate me; meanwhile, you’ll have to forgive these pages of the Believer temporarily resembling the books section of Business Traveller magazine.
Maybe the business travellers know what they’re talking about, though, because The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is riveting, beautifully written and, yes, educational. I learned stuff. I learned so much stuff that I kept blurting it out to anyone who’d listen. Do you know who Henrietta Lacks was? Have you ever heard of the HeLa cells? Did you know that they can be found in just about any research lab in the world? And so on. I’ll tell you, you don’t want to be living with me at the moment. I’m even more boring than usual.
Rebecca Skloot’s extraordinary book is the story of a dirt-poor black woman who died an agonizing death from cervical cancer in 1951. Just before Henrietta died, however, a surgeon sliced off a piece of her tumour and gave it to a research scientist called George Gey, who had been trying to grow human cells for years. Henrietta’s cells, however, grew like kudzu, for reasons that are still not entirely clear to scientists; they grew so fast, so uncontrollably, that when you look up HeLa on Wikipedia, the entry uses the word ‘contamination’ in the first four lines. HeLa is so powerful and fierce and durable, so eager to reproduce itself, that it gets into everything.
After I had read the first three or four chapters, I was a little worried on Skloot’s behalf: I thought she was telling the story too quickly. Henrietta’s cells were duplicating, her place in medical history was assured … maybe the last couple of hundred pages would turn out to be the first one hundred rehashed and analysed, and the book would lose its breathtaking opening momentum. But the author knows what she has, and what she has is a goldmine of material dealing with class, race, family, science and the law in America. In fact, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, like Adrian Nicole LeBlanc’s incredible Random Family, is about pretty much everything. (Random Family and Skloot’s book both took a decade to research and write, perhaps not coincidentally. I suspect that, in both cases, the subject matter grew richer and richer with each year of contemplation.) Skloot tells brief, vivid and astonishing stories of medical-ethics cases; she follows the cells as they get blasted into space and help find a vaccine for polio; she weaves in the lives of Henrietta’s children as they struggle through the decades following their mother’s death. They had no idea that she had achieved immortality until the 1970s, because nobody had ever taken the trouble to tell them, or to ask their permission – a courtesy denied Henrietta herself, of course. And while you can go online this very second and buy HeLa cells, the Lacks family has struggled, mostly in vain, for employment, access to health care and recognition for Henrietta’s contribution to science. If I come across a book as good, as gripping, as well constructed and as surprising as this in the rest of 2011, I will be a happy and grateful man.
Contemporary fiction is OK, but you don’t really learn anything from it, do you? It’s mostly written by a bunch of arty losers who couldn’t be bothered to go out and get a proper job, and who don’t know anything about the world, anyway. Non-fiction, that’s the thing. Or historical fiction, because you know when you’re reading it that people have done a whole load of research into nineteenth-century brick-making. Or thrillers, because you can learn a lot of things about high-grade weaponry. My New Year’s resolution is to get a job as a, you know, a business guy, and join a business-guy book club. Plus, I’m going to befriend an important politician, a minister or a secretary of state. If any of you ministers or secretaries of state out there subscribe to this magazine and read this column, then Facebook me, OK? I am literally holding my breath, so hurry.
May 2011
BOOKS BOUGHT:
★ A Visit from the Goon Squad – Jennifer Egan
★ Norwood – Charles Portis
★ Out Stealing Horses – Per Petterson
★ The Harvard Psychedelic Club: How Timothy Leary, Ram Dass, Huston Smith, and Andrew Weil Killed the Fifties and Ushered in a New Age for America – Don Lattin
★ Ball of Fire: The Tumultuous Life and Comic Art of Lucille Ball – Stefan Kanfer
★ Unincorporated Persons in the Late Honda Dynasty – Tony Hoagland
BOOKS READ:
★ Marry Me: A Romance – John Updike
★ The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry – Jon Ronson
★ Friday Night Lights: A Town, a Team, and a Dream – H. G. Bissinger
★ My Name Is Mina – David Almond
I first and last read John Updike when I was in my twenties: I devoured all the Rabbit books that had been published at that point, and looked forward to a time in my life when I would be old enough to understand them. All that adultery and misery and ambition and guilt looked completely thrilling back then – but mystifying, too. Where did it all come from? And why, aged twenty-five, was I not grown up enough to be experiencing any of it? What was wrong with me? I suspect I didn’t read any more of Updike’s novels after that point simply because they made me feel inadequate, in ways that I hadn’t previously considered. New forms of inadequacy I could live without, seeing as I didn’t know what to do with the ones I was already aware of.
I’m not quite sure why an unread copy of Marry Me winked at me from my bookshelves just before I flew to the USA for a work trip recently. On the cover of the book, Paul Theroux promises us that ‘Updike has never written better of the woe that is marriage’, but I can assure you (and my wife) that it wasn’t the cheery blurb that lured me in. Perhaps I wanted to test myself again, a quarter of a century after the last time: had I got any closer to adulthood? Would I now, finally, be able to see a reflection of my own domestic circumstances?
‘You dumb cunt,’ he said, and bounced her into the mattress again and again, ‘you get a fucking grip on yourself. You got what you wanted, didn’t you? This is it. Married bliss.’
She spat in his face, ptuh, like a cat, a jump ahead of thought; saliva sprayed back down upon her own face and as it were awakened her …
I am embarrassed to say that life is only very rarely like this chez nous. There’s the holiday season, obviously, and the occasional Saturday night, especially during January and May, when, typically, my football team Arsenal crash out of the major competitions. But, hand on heart, I could not claim that we scale these particular giddy heights of seriousness with the kind of frequency that would allow me to gasp with recognition. I was even more cowed by the way this scene concludes, half a page and fourteen lines of dialogue later:
‘You’re a nice man.’ She hugged him, having suppressed a declaration of love.
Wary, he wanted to sleep. ‘Good night, sweetie.’
I don’t like to point the finger, and in any case my wife is generally a pacific and forgiving person. But the truth is that whenever I do call her the c-word and bounce her into the mattress again and again, she has never once told me that I’m ‘a nice man’ – she tends to remain cross with me for hours. This means, in turn, that I have never been able to find it in myself to say, ‘Good night, sweetie,’ and put the whole unfortunate episode behind us. In other words, it’s her fault that we are not yet Updikean. She’s a 45-year-old child.
It wasn’t just the rows I found hard to comprehend; some of the sex was beyond me, too:
Though Sally had been married ten years, and furthermore had had lovers before Jerry, her lovemaking was wonderfully virginal, simple, and quick.
Ah, yes. That’s what we gentlemen want: women who are both sexually experienced and alive to the touch, while at the same time not too, you know, trampy. ‘Wonderfully virginal’? My therapist would have more f
un in fifty minutes than he’d ever had in his whole professional life were I to use that particular combination of adverb and adjective in a session.
Marry Me was, as you can probably imagine, totally compelling, if extraordinarily dispiriting in its conviction that trying to extract the misery out of monogamy is like trying to extract grapes from wine. We worry a lot about how technology will date fiction; it had previously occurred to me that books written in the last quarter of the twentieth century would lead me to wonder whether something fundamental has changed in the relationships between men and women. I’m not sure we do feel that husbands and wives are doomed to suspicion, enmity and contempt any longer, do we? Or am I making a twit of myself again? I suppose it’s the latter. It usually is.
Worryingly – and this must remain completely between us – I recognized myself more frequently in the checklist Jon Ronson refers to in the title of his book than I did in Marry Me. (I’m not going to repeat the title. You’ll have to go to the trouble of glancing back at the ‘Books Road’ list, and maybe you won’t bother, and then you’ll think better of me.) ‘Glibness/superficial charm’? Well, I have my moments, even if I do say so myself. And have you lost some weight? ‘Lack of realistic long-term goals’? I wouldn’t call literary immortality unrealistic, exactly. It’s more or less happened to Chaucer and Shakespeare, and I’m miles better than either of those. ‘Grandiose sense of self-worth’? Ah, now there at least I can plead not guilty. ‘Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom’? I literally stopped in the middle of typing out that last sentence in order to play Plants v. Zombies, although I did get bored of that after a couple of hours, so perhaps there is hope for me. ‘Poor behavioural controls’? Again, there is a glimmer of light, because I have just put out my last cigarette and eaten my last biscuit.
Jon Ronson, as those of you who have read Them or The Men Who Stare at Goats will know, is a fearless non-fiction writer, so familiar with, and curious about, the deranged and the fanatical that he probably asks for his hair to be cut with a lunatic fringe. Them dealt with extremists of all hues, and The Men Who Stare at Goats was about that section of the American military who believe that one day wars might be won using mind-control and gloop. The Psychopath Test, as the title suggests, cuts straight to the chase.