00/21140312.pdf; “About IBM Autonomic Computing,” http://www-3.ibm.com/autonomic/about.shtml; and Ric Telford, “The Autonomic Computing Architecture,” April 14, 2004, http://www.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/undergrad/current/dates/disclec/2003–2/RicTelfordDistinguished2.pdf.
16. Christine A. Skarda and Walter J. Freeman, “Chaos and the New Science of the Brain,” Concepts in Neuroscience 1.2 (1990): 275–85.
17. C. Geoffrey Woods,“Crossing the Midline,” Science 304.5676 (June 4, 2004): 1455–56; Stephen Matthews, “Early Programming of the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 13.9 (November 1, 2002): 373–80; Justin Crowley and Lawrence Katz, “Early Development of Ocular Dominance Columns,” Science 290.5495 (November 17, 2000): 1321–24; Anna Penn et al., “Competition in the Retinogeniculate Patterning Driven by Spontaneous Activity,” Science 279.5359 (March 27, 1998): 2108–12; M. V. Johnston et al., “Sculpting the Developing Brain,” Advances in Pediatrics 48 (2001): 1–38; P. La Cerra and R. Bingham, “The Adaptive Nature of the Human Neurocognitive Architecture: An Alternative Model,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95 (September 15, 1998): 11290–94.
18. Neural nets are simplified models of neurons that can self-organize and solve problems. See note 172 in chapter 5 for an algorithmic description of neural nets. Genetic algorithms are models of evolution using sexual reproduction with controlled mutation rates. See note 175 in chapter 5 for a detailed description of genetic algorithms. Markov models are products of a mathematical technique that are similar in some respects to neural nets.
19. Aristotle, The Works of Aristotle, trans. W. D. Ross (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908–1952 (see, in particular, Physics); see also http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/section/aristotl_philosophy.asp.
20. E. D. Adrian, The Basis of Sensation: The Action of Sense Organs (London: Christophers, 1928).
21. A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, “Action Potentials Recorded from Inside a Nerve Fibre,” Nature 144 (1939): 710–12.
22. A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, “A Quantitative Description of Membrane Current and Its Application to Conduction and Excitation in Nerve,” Journal of Physiology 117 (1952): 500–544.
23. W. S. McCulloch and W. Pitts, “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5 (1943): 115–33. This seminal paper is a difficult one to understand. For a clear introduction and explanation, see “A Computer Model of the Neuron,” the Mind Project, Illinois State University, http://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/perception/mpneuron1.html.
24. See note 172 in chapter 5 for an algorithmic description of neural nets.
25. E. Salinas and P. Thier, “Gain Modulation: A Major Computational Principle of the Central Nervous System,” Neuron 27 (2000): 15–21.
26. K. M. O’Craven and R. L. Savoy, “Voluntary Attention Can Modulate fMRI Activity in Human MT/MST,” Investigational Ophthalmological Vision Science 36 (1995): S856 (supp.).
27. Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert, Perceptrons (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969).
28. Frank Rosenblatt, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, “The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain,” Psychological Review 65.6 (1958): 386–408; see Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron.
29. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and G. M. Edelman, “Connectivity and Complexity: The Relationship Between Neuroanatomy and Brain Dynamics,” Neural Networks 13.8–9 (2000): 909–22.
30. R. H. Hahnloser et al., “Digital Selection and Analogue Amplification Coexist in a Cortex-Inspired Silicon Circuit,” Nature 405.6789 (June 22, 2000): 947–51; “MIT and Bell Labs Researchers Create Electronic Circuit That Mimics the Brain’s Circuitry,” MIT News, June 21, 2000, http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2000/machinebrain.html.
31. Manuel Trajtenberg, Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990); Michael H. Friebe, Ph.D., president, CEO, NEUROMED GmbH; P-M. L. Robitaille, A. M. Abduljalil, and A. Kangarlu, “Ultra High Resolution Imaging of the Human Head at 8 Tesla: 2K × 2K for Y2K,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 24.1 (January–February 2000): 2–8.
32. Seong-Gi Kim, “Progress in Understanding Functional Imaging Signals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100.7 (April 1, 2003): 3550–52, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/100/7/3550. See also Seong-Gi Kim et al., “Localized Cerebral Blood Flow Response at Submillimeter Columnar Resolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98.19 (September 11, 2001): 10904–9, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/98/19/10904.
33. K. K. Kwong et al., “Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Brain Activity During Primary Sensory Stimulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89.12 (June 15, 1992): 5675–79.
34. C. S. Roy and C. S. Sherrington, “On the Regulation of the Blood Supply of the Brain,” Journal of Physiology 11 (1890): 85–105.
35. M. I. Posner et al., “Localization of Cognitive Operations in the Human Brain,” Science 240.4859 (June 17, 1988): 1627–31.
36. F. M. Mottaghy et al., “Facilitation of Picture Naming after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation,” Neurology 53.8 (November 10, 1999): 1806–12.
37. Daithí Ó hAnluain, “TMS: Twilight Zone Science?” Wired News, April 18, 2002, http://wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,51699,00.html.
38. Lawrence Osborne, “Savant for a Day,” New York Times Magazine, June 22, 2003, available at http://www.wireheading.com/brainstim/savant.html.
39. Bruce H. McCormick, “Brain Tissue Scanner Enables Brain Microstructure Surveys,” Neurocomputing 44–46 (2002): 1113–18; Bruce H. McCormick, “Design of a Brain Tissue Scanner,” Neurocomputing 26–27 (1999): 1025–32; Bruce H. McCormick, “Development of the Brain Tissue Scanner,” Brain Networks Laboratory Technical Report, Texas A&M University Department of Computer Science, College Station, Tex., March 18, 2002, http://research.cs.tamu.edu/bnl/pubs/McC02.pdf.
40. Leif Finkel et al.,“Meso-scale Optical Brain Imaging of Perceptual Learning,” University of Pennsylvania grant 2000–01737 (2000).
41. E. Callaway and R. Yuste, “Stimulating Neurons with Light,” Current Opinions in Neurobiology 12.5 (October 2002): 587–92.
42. B. L. Sabatini and K. Svoboda, “Analysis of Calcium Channels in Single Spines Using Optical Fluctuation Analysis,” Nature 408.6812 (November 30, 2000): 589–93.
43. John Whitfield, “Lasers Operate Inside Single Cells,”
[email protected], October 6, 2003, http://www.nature.com/nsu/030929/030929-12.html (subscription required). Mazur’s lab: http://mazur-www.harvard.edu/research/. Jason M. Samonds and A. B. Bonds, “From Another Angle: Differences in Cortical Coding Between Fine and Coarse Discrimination of Orientation,” Journal of Neurophysiology 91 (2004): 1193–1202.
44. Robert A. Freitas Jr., Nanomedicine, vol. 2A, Biocompatibility, section 15.6.2, “Bloodstream Intrusiveness” (Georgetown, Tex.: Landes Bioscience, 2003), pp. 157–59, http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMIIA/15.6.2.htm.
45. Robert A. Freitas Jr., Nanomedicine, vol. 1, Basic Capabilities, section 7.3, “Communication Networks” (Georgetown, Tex.: Landes Bioscience, 1999), pp. 186–88, http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMI/7.3.htm.
46. Robert A. Freitas Jr., Nanomedicine, vol. 1, Basic Capabilities, section 9.4.4.3, “Intercellular Passage” (Georgetown, Tex.: Landes Bioscience, 1999), pp. 320–21, http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMI/9.4.4.3.htm#p2.
47. Keith L. Black, M.D., and Nagendra S. Ningaraj, “Modulation of Brain Tumor Capillaries for Enhanced Drug Delivery Selectively to Brain Tumor,” Cancer Control 11.3 (May/June 2004): 165–73, http://www.moffitt.usf.edu/pubs/ccj/v11n3/pdf/165.pdf.
48. Robert A. Freitas Jr., Nanomedicine, vol. 1, Basic Capabilities, section 4.1, “Nanosensor Technology” (Georgetown, Tex.: Landes Bioscience, 1999), p. 93, http://www.nanomedicine.com/NMI/4.1.htm.
49. Conference on Advanced Nanotechnology (http://www.foresight.org
/Conferences/AdvNano2004/index.html), NanoBioTech Congress and Exhibition (http://www. nanobiotec.de/), NanoBusiness Trends in Nanotechnology (http://www.nano event.com/), and NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show (http://www.nsti.org/events.html).
50. Peter D. Kramer, Listening to Prozac (New York: Viking, 1993).
51. LeDoux’s research is on the brain regions that deal with threatening stimuli, of which the central player is the amygdala, an almond-shaped region of neurons located at the base of the brain. The amygdala stores memories of threatening stimuli and controls responses having to do with fear.
MIT brain researcher Tomaso Poggio points out that “synaptic plasticity is one hardware substratum for learning but it may be important to emphasize that learning is much more than memory.” See T. Poggio and E. Bizzi, “Generalization in Vision and Motor Control,” Nature 431 (2004): 768–74. See also E. Benson, “The Synaptic Self,” APA Online, November 2002, http://www.apa.org/monitor/nov02/synaptic.html.
52. Anthony J. Bell, “Levels and Loops: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 354.1352 (December 29, 1999): 2013–20, http://www.cnl.salk.edu/~tony/ptrsl.pdf.
53. Peter Dayan and Larry Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001).
54. D. O. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (New York:Wiley, 1949).
55. Michael Domjan and Barbara Burkhard, The Principles of Learning and Behavior, 3d ed. (Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1993).
56. J. Quintana and J. M. Fuster, “From Perception to Action: Temporal Integrative Functions of Prefrontal and Parietal Neurons,” Cerebral Cortex 9.3 (April–May 1999): 213–21; W. F. Asaad, G. Rainer, and E. K. Miller, “Neural Activity in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex During Associative Learning,” Neuron 21.6 (December 1998): 1399–1407.
57. G. G. Turrigiano et al.,“Activity-Dependent Scaling of Quantal Amplitude in Neo-cortical Neurons,” Nature 391.6670 (February 26, 1998): 892–96; R. J. O’Brien et al., “Activity-Dependent Modulation of Synaptic AMPA Receptor Accumulation,” Neuron 21.5 (November 1998): 1067–78.
58. From “A New Window to View How Experiences Rewire the Brain,” Howard Hughes Medical Institute (December 19, 2002), http://www.hhmi.org/news/svoboda2.html. See also J. T. Trachtenberg et al., “Long-Term in Vivo Imaging of Experience-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Adult Cortex,” Nature 420.6917 (December 2002): 788–94, http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/physio/physio2/
Trachtenberg_NATURE.pdf; and Karen Zita and Karel Svoboda,“Activity-Dependent Synaptogenesis in the Adult Mammalian Cortex,” Neuron 35.6 (September 2002): 1015–17, http://svobodalab.cshl.edu/reprints/2414zito02neur.pdf.
59. See http://whyfiles.org/184make_memory/4.html. For more information on neuronal spines and memory, see J. Grutzendler et al., “Long-Term Dendritic Spine Stability in the Adult Cortex,” Nature 420.6917 (Dec. 19–26, 2002): 812–16.
60. S. R. Young and E. W. Rubel, “Embryogenesis of Arborization Pattern and Typography of Individual Axons in N. Laminaris of the Chicken Brain Stem,” Journal of Comparative Neurology 254.4 (December 22, 1986): 425–59.
61. Scott Makeig, “Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience Vision Overview,” http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/VisionOverview.html.
62. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Binocular Interaction in Striate Cortex of Kittens Reared with Artificial Squint,” Journal of Neurophysiology 28.6 (November 1965): 1041–59.
63. Jeffrey M. Schwartz and Sharon Begley, The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force (New York: Regan Books, 2002). See also C. Xerri, M. Merzenich et al., “The Plasticity of Primary Somatosensory Cortex Paralleling Sensorimotor Skill Recovery from Stroke in Adult Monkeys,” The Journal of Neurophysiology, 79.4 (April 1980): 2119–48. See also S. Begley, “Survival of the Busiest,” Wall Street Journal, October 11, 2002, http://webreprints.djreprints.com/606120211414.html.
64. Paula Tallal et al., “Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech,” Science 271 (January 5, 1996): 81–84. Paula Tallal is Board of Governors Professor of Neuroscience and codirector of the CMBN (Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience) at Rutgers University, and cofounder and director of SCIL (Scientific Learning Corporation); see http://www.cmbn.rutgers.edu/faculty/tallal.html. See also Paula Tallal, “Language Learning Impairment: Integrating Research and Remediation,” New Horizons for Learning 4.4 (August–September 1998), http://www.new horizons.org/neuro/tallal.htm; A. Pascual-Leone, “The Brain That Plays Music and Is Changed by It,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930 (June 2001): 315–29. See also note 63 above.
65. F. A. Wilson, S. P. Scalaidhe, and P. S. Goldman-Rakic, “Dissociation of Object and Spatial Processing Domains in Primate Prefrontal Cortex.” Science 260.5116 (June 25, 1993): 1955–58.
66. C. Buechel, J. T. Coull, and K. J. Friston,“The Predictive Value of Changes in Effective Connectivity for Human Learning,” Science 283.5407 (March 5, 1999): 1538–41.
67. They produced dramatic images of brain cells forming temporary and permanent connections in response to various stimuli, illustrating structural changes between neurons that, many scientists have long believed, take place when we store memories. “Pictures Reveal How Nerve Cells Form Connections to Store Short- and Long-Term Memories in Brain,” University of California, San Diego, November 29, 2001, http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/mccell. htm; M. A. Colicos et al., “Remodeling of Synaptic Action Induced by Photo-conductive Stimulation,” Cell 107.5 (November 30, 2001): 605–16. Video link: http://www.qflux.net/NeuroStim01.rm, Neural Silicon Interface—Quantum Flux.
68. S. Lowel and W. Singer, “Selection of Intrinsic Horizontal Connections in the Visual Cortex by Correlated Neuronal Activity,” Science 255.5041 (January 10, 1992): 209–12.
69. K. Si et al., “A Neuronal Isoform of CPEB Regulates Local Protein Synthesis and Stabilizes Synapse-Specific Long-Term Facilitation in Aplysia,” Cell 115.7 (December 26, 2003): 893–904; K. Si, S. Lindquist, and E. R. Kandel, “A Neuronal Isoform of the Aplysia CPEB Has Prion-Like Properties,” Cell 115.7 (December 26, 2003): 879–91. These researchers have found that CPEB may help form and preserve long-term memories by undergoing shape changes in synapses similar to deformations of prions (protein fragments implicated in mad-cow disease and other neurologic illnesses). The study suggests that this protein does its good work while in a prion state, contradicting a widely held belief that a protein that has prion activity is toxic or at least doesn’t function properly. This prion mechanism may also have roles in areas such as cancer maintenance and organ development, suspects Eric R. Kandel, University Professor of physiology and cell biophysics, psychiatry, biochemistry, and molecular biophysics at Columbia University and winner of a 2000 Nobel Prize for Medicine. See Whitehead Institute press release, http://www.wi.mit.edu/nap/features/nap_feature_memory.html.
70. M. C. Anderson et al., “Neural Systems Underlying the Suppression of Unwanted Memories,” Science 303.5655 (January 9, 2004): 232–35. The findings could encourage the development of new ways for people to overcome traumatizing memories. Keay Davidson, “Study Suggests Brain Is Built to Forget: MRIs in Stanford Experiments Indicate Active Suppression of Unneeded Memories,” San Francisco Chronicle, January 9, 2004, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/01/09/FORGET.TMP&type=science.
71. Dieter C. Lie et al., “Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain: New Strategies for CNS Diseases,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 44 (2004): 399–421.
72. H. van Praag, G. Kempermann, and F. H. Gage, “Running Increases Cell Proliferation and Neurogenesis in the Adult Mouse Dentate Gyrus,” Nature Neuroscience 2.3 (March 1999): 266–70.
73. Minsky and Papert, Perceptrons .
74. Ray Kurzweil, The Age of Spiritual Machines (New York: Viking, 1999), p. 79.
r /> 75. Basis functions are nonlinear functions that can be combined linearly (by adding together multiple weighted-basis functions) to approximate any nonlinear function. Pouget and Snyder, “Computational Approaches to Sensorimotor Transformations,” Nature Neuroscience 3.11 Supplement (November 2000): 1192–98.
76. T. Poggio, “A Theory of How the Brain Might Work,” in Proceedings of Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 4 (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1990), 899–910. Also see T. Poggio and E. Bizzi, “Generalization in Vision and Motor Control,” Nature 431 (2004): 768–74.
77. R. Llinas and J. P. Welsh, “On the Cerebellum and Motor Learning,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 3.6 (December 1993): 958–65; E. Courchesne and G. Allen, “Prediction and Preparation, Fundamental Functions of the Cerebellum,” Learning and Memory 4.1 (May–June 1997): 1–35; J. M. Bower, “Control of Sensory Data Acquisition,” International Review of Neurobiology 41 (1997): 489–513.
78. J. Voogd and M. Glickstein, “The Anatomy of the Cerebellum,” Trends in Neuro-science 21.9 (September 1998): 370–75; John C. Eccles, Masao Ito, and János Szentágothai, The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967); Masao Ito, The Cerebellum and Neural Control (New York: Raven, 1984).
79. N. Bernstein, The Coordination and Regulation of Movements (New York: Pergamon Press, 1967).
80. U.S. Office of Naval Research press release, “Boneless, Brainy, and Ancient,” September 26, 2001, http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2001-11/oonr-bba112 601.php; the octopus arm “could very well be the basis of next-generation robotic arms for undersea, space, as well as terrestrial applications.”
81. S. Grossberg and R. W. Paine, “A Neural Model of Cortico-Cerebellar Interactions During Attentive Imitation and Predictive Learning of Sequential Handwriting Movements,” Neural Networks 13.8–9 (October–November 2000): 999–1046.
82. Voogd and Glickstein,“Anatomy of the Cerebellum”; Eccles, Ito, and Szentágothai, Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine; Ito, Cerebellum and Neural Control ; R. Llinas, in Handbook of Physiology, vol. 2, The Nervous System, ed. V. B. Brooks (Bethesda, Md.: American Physiological Society, 1981), pp. 831–976.