Return to text.
44 Chatsworth 206: GD to LS, April 18, 1778.
Return to text.
45 The following notice appeared in the London Chronicle on November 26, 1778: “On Tuesday next will be published, in Two Volumes, 12 mo. price 5s sewed, or 6s bound. ‘The Sylph: A Novel.’ Printed for T. Lowndes in Fleet Street, where may also be had, just published, in 5 vols. ‘Evelina, a Novel,’ price 7s, 6d. sewed.” Evelina, or A Young Lady’s Entrance into the World had first appeared anonymously in January, and was an immediate success. The clamour to know the author was so great that the first-time novelist was forced to step out from obscurity and reveal herself to be Fanny Burney. She was still unmarried at twenty-six and somewhat shy, but within a few months Mrs. Thrale, who knew her father, Charles Burney, had introduced her to all the notable figures on the literary scene. Thomas Lowndes, Fanny’s publisher, was so pleased with her sales that he deliberately advertised The Sylph to make it appear to be one of hers. This little commercial ploy outraged the Bur-neys, and Charles Burney ordered Lowndes to stop. Their anger was not merely pique at his selling techniques but also genuine fear over the harm The Sylph might do to Fanny’s reputation. Unlike Evelina, The Sylph was less a novel than an exposé of the corrupting mores of the ton.
Return to text.
46 Chatsworth 32: GD to LS, Oct. 16–22, 1774.
Return to text.
47 K. Balderston, ed., Thraliana, The Diary of Mrs Hester Lynch Thrale (Later Mrs Piozzi), 1776–1809 (Oxford 1951), I, p. 363, Jan. 20, 1779.
Return to text.
4: A POPULAR PATRIOT
1 London Chronicle, 43, June 4–6, 1778.
Return to text.
2 Ibid., June 13–16, 1778.
Return to text.
3 BL Althorp G287: GD to Lord Al-thorp, May 4, 1778.
Return to text.
4 Chatsworth 212: GD to LS, May 6–12, 1778.
Return to text.
5 Morning Post, Saturday July 18, 1788.
Return to text.
6 Ibid., Wednesday Sept. 23, 1778.
Return to text.
7 BL Althorp F123: Lady Clermont to LS, circa August 1778.
Return to text.
8 Chatsworth 182: GD to LS, August 21, 1777.
Return to text.
9 BL Althorp F123: Lady Clermont to LS, circa August 1778.
Return to text.
10 Chatsworth 218: LS to GD, July 30, 1778.
Return to text.
11 Chatsworth 223: LS to GD, August 20, 1778.
Return to text.
12 Reginald Blunt, Mrs Montagu (Edinburgh 1923), II, p. 58.
Return to text.
13 BL Althorp F8: Lord Althorp to LS, Oct. 20, 1778.
Return to text.
14 Chatsworth 235: GD to LS, Nov. 4, 1778.
Return to text.
15 Chatsworth 248: GD to LS, Oct. 12–14, 1779.
Return to text.
16 Chatsworth 233: GD to LS, Oct. 26, 1778.
Return to text.
17 SNRA Douglas-Home MSS TD95/54: diary of Lady Mary Coke, June 28, 1778.
Return to text.
17 Ibid., Dec. 17, 1778.
Return to text.
19 Duke of Argyll, ed., Intimate Society Letters of the Eighteenth Century (London 1910), I, p. 267: Lady Sarah Lennox to Lady Sarah O’Brien, Feb. 1779.
Return to text.
20 SNRA Douglas-Home MSS TD95/54: diary of Lady Mary Coke, Dec. 3, 1778.
Return to text.
21 Chatsworth 236: GD to LS, Dec. 4, 1778.
Return to text.
22 Chatsworth 237: LS to GD, Dec. 5, 1778.
Return to text.
23 SNRA Douglas-Home MSS TD95/54: diary of Lady Mary Coke, Dec. 11, 1780.
Return to text.
24 Chatsworth 237: LS to GD, Dec. 5, 1778.
Return to text.
25 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, Sept. 15, 1779.
Return to text.
26 Ibid., Sept. 30, 1779: “The gallant conduct of Capt. Garner of the Fly sloop in the late engagement with the two French Cutters, cannot be sufficiently extolled. Having exhausted all his ammunition, he ordered a boat out, in which he rowed on board the packet to procure more and appeared before the noble passengers on the deck with one side of him almost covered with the blood of that brave officer, his master Mr Armourer, who was killed close by him. Lord Spencer here addressing him said he had given the strongest testimony of his courage, and therefore begged he ‘would no longer contend with a force so superior at the hazard of his ship and crew, for it was of very little consequence whether the Duchess of Devonshire, Lady Spencer, and himself, were carried into France or not.’—‘It may be of no consequence to your Lordship,’ replied the brave Garner, ‘but it is of the utmost consequence to me, and therefore you shall not be taken while I have life, by G—!’ ”
Return to text.
27 Chatsworth 244: GD to LS, Oct. 1–3, 1779.
Return to text.
28 Chatsworth 246: GD to LS, Oct. 6–10, 1779.
Return to text.
29 Chatsworth 253: GD to LS, Oct. 21, 1779.
Return to text.
30 BL Althorp F121: Lord Frederick Cavendish to LS, Nov. 11, 1779.
Return to text.
31 Chatsworth 248: GD to LS, Oct. 12–14, 1779.
Return to text.
32 Chatsworth 252: LS to GD, Oct. 1779.
Return to text.
33 PRO 30/29/4/7, f. 74: Miss R. Lloyd to Lady Stafford, July 8, 1780.
Return to text.
34 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, April 16, 1781.
Return to text.
35 Chatsworth 287: GD to LS, May 9, 1780.
Return to text.
36 Chatsworth 284: LS to GD, May 1, 1780.
Return to text.
37 Chatsworth 281: LS to GD, April 26, 1780.
Return to text.
38 Chatsworth 287: GD to LS, May 9, 1780.
Return to text.
39 BL Althorp F9: Lord Althorp to LS, April 10, 1780.
Return to text.
40 BL Althorp G287: GD to Lord Al-thorp, May 9, 1780.
Return to text.
41 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, March 21, 1781.
Return to text.
42 PRO 30/29/4/7, f. 77: Miss R. Lloyd to Lady Stafford, Sept. 7, 1780.
Return to text.
43 Chatsworth 321: Lady Harriet Spencer to Miss Shipley, circa Oct. 1780.
Return to text.
44 Ibid.
Return to text.
45 PRO 30/29/4/7, f. 76: Miss R. Lloyd to Lady Stafford, August 24, 1780.
Return to text.
46 Chatsworth 306: GD to LS, July 28, 1780.
Return to text.
47 BL Althorp F125: Miss Lloyd to LS, Oct. 30, 1775.
Return to text.
48 Chatsworth 269: Edmund Burke to GD, March 17, 1780. The excitement surrounding the Duke’s speech offended those who were unimpressed by the Cavenish wealth. Mrs. Thrale wrote in her diary, “what a Bustle they make about the Duke of Devonshire’s speaking, one would think it was Balaam’s Ass.” K. Balderston, ed., Thraliana, The Diary of Mrs Hester Lynch Thrale (Later Mrs Piozzi), 1776–1809 (Oxford 1951), VI, p. 434: March 26, 1780.
Return to text.
49 Chatsworth 279: GD to LS, April 24, 1780.
Return to text.
50 Chatsworth 280: GD to LS, April 25, 1780.
Return to text.
51 Chatsworth 287: GD to LS, May 9, 1780.
Return to text.
52 F. O’Gorman, The Rise of Party in England (London 1975), p. 420.
Return to text.
53 Ibid.
Return to text.
54 Henry Wheatley, The Historical and Posthumous Memoirs of Sir Nathaniel Wraxall (London 1884), V, p. 371.
Return to text.
55 The relationship fits easily within the patterns of the Prince’s l
ove life. The first time he fell in love was over one of his sister’s attendants, Mary Hamilton, granddaughter of the Duke of Hamilton. Like all the women he ever fancied, she was several years older than he. She had no idea of his passion until he bombarded her with daily letters. The rather shy and upright twenty-three-year-old was shocked by her unwanted suitor’s intemperate ravings—he loved her “beyond the idea of everything that is human.” He sent a lock of his hair and requested she return one of hers in the engraved locket he had provided. After a few weeks of enduring the brunt of his extreme passion, she managed to convince him that his suit was futile and he agreed to address her as “friend and sister.” Calling himself her dearest brother, he sought her advice on everything, but especially on clothes and even went so far as to send her patterns from his tailor. His attentions abruptly ceased when he met Perdita, and they rarely spoke again. As a model, this early relationship makes the Prince’s later infatuation with Georgiana plausible.
Return to text.
56 Chatsworth 401.1: Lady Melbourne to GD, circa June 1782. Lady Melbourne managed to keep the affair going for almost two years, and in 1784 gave birth to his son, George. The newspapers only really began to pass comment when she and Geor-giana helped the Prince to refurbish Carlton House in 1783. That gave the Morning Herald the opportunity to write slyly, “the alterations now making at Carlton House . . . by Lady Melbourne, has the guidance of most of the erections on this spot.” Lady Melbourne profited from the liaison in many ways, not least in having her husband made a Gentleman of the Bedchamber.
Return to text.
57 Chatsworth 297: GD to LS, June 5, 1780.
Return to text.
58 Chatsworth 289: GD to LS, June 7, 1780.
Return to text.
59 Chatsworth 303: GD to LS, June 9, 1780.
Return to text.
60 Chatsworth 296: GD to LS, May 30, 1780.
Return to text.
61 C. Price ed., The Letters of Richard Brinsley Sheridan (Oxford 1966), I, p. 135: R. B. Sheridan to GD, Sept. 19, 1780.
Return to text.
5: INTRODUCTION TO POLITICS
1 1 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, Jan. 19, 1781.
Return to text.
2 Carlisle MSS J14/1/558: W. Fawkener to Lord Carlisle, March 2, 1781.
Return to text.
3 BL Althorp F123: Lady Clermont to LS, June 8, 1780.
Return to text.
4 Chatsworth 329: LS to GD, Feb. 14, 1781.
Return to text.
5 Chatsworth 323: GD to LS, Dec. 21, 1780.
Return to text.
6 Chatsworth 371: LS to GD, Oct. 4, 1781.
Return to text.
7 Chatsworth 325: GD to LS, Feb. 12, 1781.
Return to text.
8 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, March 21, 1781.
Return to text.
9 Ibid., March 24, 1781.
Return to text.
10 Chichester R. O. Lord Bessborough MSS 231: Dorothy, Duchess of Portland to Lord Duncannon, April 1, 1781.
Return to text.
11 Ibid., April 3, 1781.
Return to text.
12 Chatsworth 261: LS to GD, Nov. 17, 1779.
Return to text.
13 Chatsworth 369: LS to GD, Sept. 29, 1781.
Return to text.
14 Carlisle MSS J/14/1/267: George Sel-wyn to Lord Carlisle, May 28, 1781.
Return to text.
15 Colonel George Hanger, The Life, Adventures, and Opinions of Colonel George Hanger (London 1801), II, p. 126.
Return to text.
16 S. Rogers, Recollections of the Table Talk of Samuel Rogers (London 1856), p. 190.
Return to text.
17 SNRA Douglas-Home MSS TD95/54: diary of Lady Mary Coke, June 17–22, 1781.
Return to text.
18 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, June 11, 1781.
Return to text.
19 Chatsworth 362: GD to LS, Sept. 3–12, 1781.
Return to text.
20 N. Mckendrick, J. Brewer, and J. H. Plumb, eds., The Birth of a Consumer Society (London 1982), p. 112.
Return to text.
21 Ibid. Georgiana’s popularity served many purposes. Authors frequently dedicated their books to her with an eye to associating their work with fashion. She did not have the heart to refuse such dedications although sometimes the work was abominable. “A thousand thanks for Mr Garrick’s very pretty verses,” wrote Mrs. Mon-tagu, disgusted by the dross sometimes associated with Georgiana. “I was glad to see something address’d to the Duchess of Devonshire of which wit and good nature would make her amends for the austerity and dullness of some things in prose which had been addressed to her Grace.” Reginald Blunt, Mrs Montagu (Edinburgh 1923), II, p. 18; Mrs. Montagu to Mrs. Vesey, June 1, 1777.
Return to text.
22 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, Dec. 3, 1781.
Return to text.
23 P. G. Thomas, Lord North (London 1976), p. 111.
Return to text.
24 Carlisle MSS J14/1/337: George Sel-wyn to Lord Carlisle, March 1782.
Return to text.
25 Ibid., March 22, 1782.
Return to text.
26 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, March 30, 1782.
Return to text.
27 Carlisle MSS J14/1/345: George Sel-wyn to Lord Carlisle, March 21, 1782.
Return to text.
28 Nathaniel Wraxall, Posthumous and Historical Memoirs of My Own Time (London 1904), II, p. 196.
Return to text.
29 Basil Cozens-Hardy, ed., The Diary of Silas Neville, 1767–1788 (Oxford 1950), p. 29.
Return to text.
30 London Chronicle, April 2–4, 1782.
Return to text.
31 Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser, May 21, 1782.
Return to text.
32 Chatsworth 387: LS to GD, May 22, 1782.
Return to text.
33 Carlisle MSS J/14/1/570: James Hare to Lord Carlisle, Feb. 11, 1782.
Return to text.
34 Chatsworth 433: Annecdotes Concerning HRH the Prince of Wales, Sept. 1782.
Return to text.
6: THE NEWCOMER
1 The Morning Herald and Daily Advertiser erroneously reported that month that Georgiana was pregnant, but there is no mention in Georgiana’s letters of a pregnancy. Lady Mary Coke had heard she was pregnant in November and the papers hinted at it in January. It is likely that Georgiana miscarried before the spring: she would not have been allowed on to the hustings with Charles Fox if she had been pregnant.
Return to text.
2 Chatsworth 390: GD to LS, May 22–24, 1782.
Return to text.
3 Chatsworth 393: GD to LS, June 1, 1782.
Return to text.
4 Chatsworth 397: GD to LS, June 8, 1782.
Return to text.
5 Dorothy Stuart, Dearest Bess (London 1955), p. 2.
Return to text.
6 It was only when Frederick Hervey was offered the Bishopric of Derry that the family had their first permanent home. Once safely installed, the new Bishop indulged his heterodox interests. He was good about employing Irish rather than English clergy and, as one would expect from a friend of Voltaire, he despised religious bigots. But he spent as little time as possible at his duties. One of his greatest pleasures was to play humiliating tricks on unsuspecting victims. Once he entertained the fattest clergymen of his acquaintance, and after feeding them a sumptuous dinner announced a competition: a race across his park and the winner would receive a newly vacant, and plum, living. He lined them up outside while they groaned and shivered and sent them running off into a bog, where they almost drowned in the thick oozing mud. After much crying and floundering about in the darkness they managed to climb back on to the bank, and returned wet and filthy to the house. They found their horses waiting for them and the door locked. It was this sort of behaviour which confirmed that the Bishop
was a true Hervey.
Return to text.
7 Chatsworth 532.4: Lady Elizabeth Foster [henceforth Bess] to GD, circa Sept. 1782.
Return to text.
8 Brian Fothergill, The Mitred Earl (London 1988), p. 47.
Return to text.
9 Ibid., p. 84.
Return to text.
10 Caroline Grosvenor, The First Lady Wharncliffe and Her Family (London 1927), I, pp. 9–10.
Return to text.
11 Ibid.
Return to text.
12 The paid companion was the only bona fide job for an upper-class indigent. Often she was a poor, distant relation of the family who received no regular salary but bed and board, and the occasional cast-offs. She dined with the family, was expected to amuse or keep quiet when the occasion demanded, fetched, carried, listened and generally undertook anything that was tedious. An outsider was hired on the basis of her personality and her willingness to please, hence the paid companion’s reputation for sycophancy.