Page 11 of Beaker's Dozen


  She was the only person I’d ever seen who came close to matching what she should have been.

  “This is the latest batch of phase space diagrams,” Fran said. “The computer just finished them—I haven’t even, printed them, yet.”

  I crouched beside her to peer at the terminal.

  “Don’t look any more disorganized to me than the last bunch.”

  “Nor to me, either, unfortunately. Same old, same old.” She laughed: in chaos theory, there is no same old, same old. The phase space diagrams were infinitely complex, never repeating, without control.

  But not completely. The control was there, not readily visible, a key we just didn’t recognize with the mathematics we had. Yet.

  An ideal no one had seen.

  “I keep thinking that your young mind will pick up something I’ve missed,” Fran said. “I’ll make you a copy of these. Plus, Pyotr Solenski has published some new work in Berlin that I think you should take a look at. I downloaded it from the net and e-mailed you.”

  I nodded, but didn’t answer. For the first time today, calm flowed through me, soothing me.

  Calm.

  Rightness.

  Numbers.

  Fran had done good, if undistinguished, work in pure mathematics all her life. For the last few years she—and I, as her graduate student—had worked in the precise and austere world of iterated function theory, where the result of a given equation is recycled as the starting value of the next repetition of the same equation. If you do that, the results are predictable: the sequences will converge on a given set of numbers. No matter what initial value you plug into the equation, with enough iterations you end up at the same figures, called attractors. Every equation can generate a set of attractors, which iterations converge on like homing pigeons flying back to their nests.

  Until you raise the value plugged into the equation past a point called the Feigenbaum number. Then the sequences produced lose all regularity. You can no longer find any pattern. Attractors disappear. The behavior of even fairly simple equations becomes chaotic. The pigeons fly randomly, blind and lost.

  Or do they?

  Fran—like dozens of other pure mathematicians around the world—looked at all that chaos, and sorted through it, and thought she glimpsed an order to the pigeons’ flight. A chaotic order, a controlled randomness. We’d been looking at nonlinear differential equations, and at their attractors, which cause iterated values not to converge but to diverge. States which start out only infinitesimally separated go on to diverge more and more and more . . . and more, moving toward some hidden values called, aptly enough, strange attractors. Pigeons from the same nest are drawn, through seeming chaos, to points we can identify but not prove the existence of.

  Fran and I had a tentative set of equations for those idealized points.

  Only tentative. Something wasn’t right. We’d overlooked something, something neither of us could see. It was there—I knew it—but we couldn’t see it. When we did, we’d have proof that any physical system showing an ultra dependence on initial conditions must have a strange attractor buried somewhere in its structure. The implications would be profound—for chaos mathematics, for fluid mechanics, for weather control.

  For me.

  I loved looking for that equation. Sometimes I thought I could glimpse it, behind the work we were doing, almost visible to me. But not often. And the truth I hadn’t told Fran, couldn’t tell her, was that I didn’t need to find it, not in the way she did. She was driven by the finest kind of intellectual hunger, a true scientist.

  I just wanted the peace and calm of looking. The same calm I’d found over the years in simple addition, in algebra, in calculus, in Boolean logic. In numbers, which were not double state but just themselves, no other set of integers or constants or fractals lying behind these ones, better and fuller and more fulfilled, Mathematics had its own arbitrary assumptions but no shadows on the cave wall.

  So I spent as long with Fran in front of the terminal as I could, and printed out the last batch of phase space diagrams and spent time with those, and went over our work yet again, and read Pyotr Solenski’s work, and then I could no longer put off returning to the material world.

  As soon as I walked into Introduction to Set Theory, my nausea returned.

  Mid October. Two more months of teaching this class, twice a week, 90 minutes a session, to keep my fellowship. I didn’t know if I could do it. But without the fellowship, I couldn’t work with Fran.

  Thirty-two faces bobbed in front of me, with 32 shimmering ghostly behind them. Different. So different. Jim Mulcahy: a sullen slouching 18-year-old with acned face and resentful eyes, flunking out—and behind him, the quiet assured Jim, unhamstrung by whatever had caused that terrible resentfulness, whatever kept him from listening to me or studying the text. Jessica Harris: straight As, thin face pinched by anxiety, thrown into panic whenever she didn’t instantly comprehend some point—and behind her, the confident Jessica who could wait a minute, study the logic, take pleasure in her eventual mastery of it. Sixty-four faces, and 64 pieces of furniture in two rooms, and sometimes when I turned away to the two blackboards (my writing firm on the pristine surface, and quavery over dust-filled scratches), even turning away wasn’t enough to clear my head.

  “The students complain you don’t look at them when you talk,” my department chair had said. “And you don’t make yourself available after class to deal with their problems.”

  He’d shimmered behind himself, a wise leader and an overworked bureaucrat.

  Nobody had any questions. Nobody stayed after class. Nobody in the first 32 students had any comments on infinite sets, and the second 32 I couldn’t hear, couldn’t reach.

  I left the classroom with a raging headache, and almost tripped over a student in the hall.

  Chairs lined the corridor walls (water-stained plaster; lively-textured stucco) for students to wait for faculty, or each other, or enlightenment. One chair blocked fully a third of my doorway, apparently shifted there by the girl who sat, head down, drawing in a notebook. My headache was the awful kind that clouds vision. I banged my knee into a corner of the chair (graffiti on varnish on cheap pine; clean hand-stained hardwood). My vision cleared but my knee throbbed painfully.

  “Do you mind not blocking the doorway, Miss?”

  “Sorry.” She didn’t look up, or stop drawing.

  “Please move the damned chair.”

  She hitched it sideways, never raising her eyes from the paper. The chair banged along the hall floor, clanging onto my throbbing brain. Beside her, the other girl shrugged humorously, in charming self-deprecation.

  I forced myself. “Are you waiting for me? To see about the class?”

  “No.” Still she didn’t look up, rude even for a student. I pushed past her, and my eyes fell on her drawing paper.

  It was full of numbers: a table for binomial distribution of coin-tossing probabilities, with x as the probability of throwing n heads, divided by the probability of throwing an equal number of heads and tails. The columns were neatly labeled. She was filling in the numbers as rapidly as her pen could write, to seven decimal places. From memory, or mental calculation?

  I blurted, “Most people don’t do that.”

  “Is that an observation, an insult, or a compliment?”

  All I could see of both girls were the bent tops of their heads: lank dirty blonde, feathery golden waves.

  She said, “Because if it’s an observation, then consider that I said, ‘I already know that.’”

  The vertigo started to take me.

  “If it’s an insult, then I said, ‘I’m not most people.’”

  I put out one hand to steady myself against the wall.

  “And if it’s a compliment, I said, ‘Thanks.’ I guess.”

  The hallway pulsed. Students surged toward me, 64 of them, except that I was only supposed to teach 32 and they weren’t the ones who really wanted to learn, they were warped and deformed versio
ns of what they should have been and I couldn’t teach them because I hated them too much. For not being what they could have been. For throwing off my inner balance, the delicate metaphysical ear that coordinates reality with ideal with acceptance. For careening past the Feigenbaum number, into versions of themselves where attraction was replaced by turbulent chaos . . . I fell heavily against the wall, gulping air.

  “Hey!” The girl looked up. She had a scrawny, bony face with a too-wide mouth, and a delicate, fine-boned face with rosy generous lips. But mostly I saw her eyes. They looked at me with conventional concern, and then at the wall behind me, and then back at me, and shock ran over me like gasoline fire. The girl reached out an arm to steady me, but her gaze had already gone again past me, as mine did everywhere but in the mirror, inexorably drawn to what I had never seen: the other Jack shimmering behind me, the ideal self I was not.

  “It affects you differently than me,” Mia said over coffee in the student cafeteria. I’d agreed to go there only because it was nearly empty. “I don’t get nauseated or light-headed. I just get mad. It’s such a fucking waste.”

  She sat across from me, and the other Mia sat behind her, green eyes hopeful in her lovely face. Hopeful that we could share this, that she was no longer alone, that I might be able to end her loneliness. The physical Mia didn’t look hopeful. She looked just as furious as she said she was.

  “Nine times out of ten, Jack, people could become their ideal selves, or at least a whole lot fucking closer, if they just tried. They’re just too lazy or screwed up to put some backbone into it.”

  I looked away from her. “For me,” I said hesitantly, “I guess it’s mostly the unfairness of it that’s such a burden. Seeing the ideal has interfered with every single thing I’ve ever wanted to do with my life.” Except mathematics.

  She squinted at me. “Unfairness? So what? Just don’t give in to it.”

  “I think it’s a little more complicated than—”

  “It’s not. In fact, it’s real simple. Just do what you want, anyway. And don’t whine.”

  “I’m not—”

  “You are. Just don’t let the double vision stop you from trying anything you want to. I don’t.” She glared belligerently. Behind her, the other Mia radiated determination tempered by acceptance.

  “Mia, I do try to do the things I want. Math. My dissertation. Teaching.” Not that I wanted to be doing that.

  “Good,” she snapped, and looked over my shoulder. “Double vision doesn’t have to defeat us if we don’t let it.”

  I said, “Have you ever found any others like us?” What did my ideal self look like? What strengths could she see on his face?

  “No, you’re the only one. I thought I was alone.”

  “Me, too. But if there’s two of us, there could be more. Maybe we should—”

  “Damn it, Jack, at least look at me when you’re talking to me!”

  Slowly my gaze moved back to her face. Her physical face. Her mouth gaped in anger; her eyes had narrowed to ugly slits. My gaze moved back.

  “Stop it, you asshole! Stop it!”

  “Don’t call me names, Mia.”

  “Don’t tell me what to do! You have no right to tell me what to do! You’re no different from

  I said, “Why would I look at you if I could look at her?”

  She stood up so abruptly that her chair fell over. Then she was gone.

  I put my hands over my eyes, blotting out all sight. Of everything.

  “What was this system before it started to diverge?” Fran said.

  She held in her hands a phase space diagram I hadn’t seen before. Her eyes sparkled. Even so, there was something heavy around her mouth, something that wasn’t in the Fran behind her, and for a minute I was so startled I couldn’t concentrate on the printouts. The ideal Fran, too, looked different from the day before. Her skin glowed from within, almost too strongly, as if a flashlight burned behind its pale fine-grained surface.

  “That was rhetorical, Jack. I know what the system was before it diverged-the equations are there on the desk. But this one looks different. See . . . here. . .”

  She pointed and explained. Nonlinear systems with points that start out very close together tend to diverge from each other, into chaos. But there was something odd about these particular diagrams: they were chaotic, as always around a strange attractor, but in non-patterns I hadn’t seen before. I couldn’t quite grasp the difference. Almost, but not quite.

  I said, “Where are those original equations?”

  “There. On that paper—no, that one.”

  “You’re using Arnfelser’s Constant? Why?”

  “Look at the equations again.”

  I did, and this time I recognized them, even though subatomic particle physics is not my field. James Arnfelser had won the Nobel two years ago for his work on the behavior of electron/positron pairs during the first 30 seconds of the universe’s life. Fran was mucking around with the chaos of creation.

  I looked at the phase space diagrams again.

  She said, “You can almost see it, can’t you? Almost . . . see . . .”

  “Fran!”

  She had her hand to her midriff. “It’s nothing, Jack. Just indigestion on top of muscle tension on top of sleeplessness. I was up all night on those equations.”

  “Sit down.”

  “No, I’m fine. Really I am.” She smiled at me, and the skin around her eyes, a mass of fine wrinkles, stretched tauter. And behind her, the other Fran didn’t smile. At all. She looked at me, and I had the insane idea that somehow, for the first time, she saw me.

  It was the first time I’d ever seen them diverge.

  “Fran, I want you to see a doctor.”

  “You’re good to be so concerned. But I’m fine. Look, Jack, here on the diagram . . .”

  Both Frans lit up with the precise pleasure of numbers. And I—out of cowardice, out of relief—let them.

  “. . . can’t understand a thing in this fucking course.”

  The voice was low, male, the words distinct but the speaker not identifiable.

  I turned from writing equations on the board. Thirty-two/sixty-four faces swam in front of me. “Did one of you say something?”

  Silence. A few girls looked down at their notebooks. The rest of the students stared back at me, stony. I turned back to the board and wrote another half equation.

  “. . . fucking moron who couldn’t teach a dog to piss.” A different voice.

  My hand, holding the chalk, shook. I went on writing.

  “. . . shouldn’t be allowed in front of a classroom.” This time, a girl.

  I turned around again. My stomach churned. The students stared back at me. They were all in on this, or at least tacitly complicit.

  I heard my voice shake. “If you have any complaints about how this course is being taught, you are advised to take them up with the department chair, or to express them on the course evaluation form distributed at the end of the semester. Meanwhile, we have additional work to cover.” I turned back to the board.

  “. . . fucking prick who can’t make anything clear.”

  My chalk stopped, in the middle of writing an integer. I couldn’t make it move again. No matter how hard I concentrated, the chalk wouldn’t complete the number.

  “. . . trying to make us flunk so he looks bigger.”

  Slowly I turned to face the class.

  They sat in front of me, slumping or smirking or grinning inanely. Empty faces. Stupid faces. A few embarrassed faces. Fourth-rate minds, interested only in getting by, ugly gaping maws into which we were supposed to stuff the brilliance of Maxwell and Boltzmann and von Neumann and Russell and Arnfelser. So they could masticate it and spit it on the floor.

  And behind them . . . behind them . . .

  “Get out,” I said.

  One hundred twenty-eight eyes opened wide.

  “You heard me!” I heard myself screaming. “Get out of my classroom! Get out of this university
! You don’t belong here, it’s criminal that you’re here, none of you are worth the flame to set you on fire! Get out! You’ve diverged too far from what you . . . what you . . .”

  A few boys in the front row sauntered out. A girl in the back started to cry. Then some of them were yelling at me, shrieking, only the shrieking wasn’t in my classroom, it was in the hall, down the hall, it was sirens and bells and outside the window, an emergency medical van, and they were carrying Fran out on a stretcher, her long-fingered hand dangling limply over the side, and nobody would listen to me explain that the terrible thing was not that she wasn’t moving but that lying on the stretcher so quietly were not two Frans, as there should have been, but only one. Only one.

  I didn’t go to the funeral.

  I took Fran’s last set of diagrams, and copied her files off her hard drive, and packed a bag. Before I checked into the Morningside Motel on Route 64, I left messages on Diane’s answering machine, and the department chair’s, and my landlady’s.

  “—don’t want to see you again. It’s not your fault, but I mean it. I’m sorry.”

  “I resign my teaching fellowship, and my status as a post-doc at this university.”

  “My rent is paid through the end of the month. I will not be returning. Please pack my things and send them to my sister, COD, at this address. Thank you.”

  I bolted the motel door, unwrapped two bottles of Jack Daniels, and raised my glass to the mirror.

  But no toast came. To him? Who would not have been doing this stupid melodramatic thing? Who would have seen Fran’s death as the random event it was, and grieved it with courage and grace? Who would have figured out the best way to cope with his problems from a healthy sense of balance undestroyed by knowing exactly what he could never, ever, ever measure up to? I’d be damned if I’d drink to him.

  “To Fran,” I said, and downed it straight, and went on downing it straight until I couldn’t see the other, better room lurking behind this one.

  Even drunk, you dream.

  I didn’t know that. I’d expected the hangovers, and the throwing up, and the terrible, blessed blackouts. I’d expected the crying jag. And the emotional pain, like a dull drill. But I’d never been drunk for four days before. I’d thought that when I slept the pain would go away, into oblivion. I didn’t know I’d dream.