Page 7 of Sylvia's Marriage

by kissing."

  I thought to myself again: The horror of this superstition of

  prudery! Can one think of anything more destructive to life than the

  placing of a taboo upon such matters? Here is the whole of the

  future at stake--the health, the sanity, the very existence of the

  race. And what fiend has been able to contrive it that we feel like

  criminals when we mention the subject?

  23. Our intimacy progressed, and the time came when Sylvia told me

  about her marriage. She had accepted Douglas van Tuiver because she

  had lost Frank Shirley, and her heart was broken. She could never

  imagine herself loving any other man; and not knowing exactly what

  marriage meant, it had been easier for her to think of her family,

  and to follow their guidance. They had told her that love would

  come; Douglas had implored her to give him a chance to teach her to

  love him. She had considered what she could do with his money--both

  for her home-people and for those she spoke of vaguely as "the

  poor." But now she was making the discovery that she could not do

  very much for these "poor."

  "It isn't that my husband is mean," she said. "On the contrary, the

  slightest hint will bring me any worldly thing I want. I have homes

  in half a dozen parts of America--I have _carte blanche_ to open

  accounts in two hemispheres. If any of my people need money I can

  get it; but if I want it for myself, he asks me what I'm doing with

  it--and so I run into the stone-wall of his ideas."

  At first the colliding with this wall had merely pained and

  bewildered her. But now the combination of Veblen and myself had

  helped her to realize what it meant. Douglas van Tuiver spent his

  money upon a definite system: whatever went to the maintaining of

  his social position, whatever added to the glory, prestige and power

  of the van Tuiver name--that money was well-spent; while money spent

  to any other end was money wasted--and this included all ideas and

  "causes." And when the master of the house knew that his money was

  being wasted, it troubled him.

  "It wasn't until after I married him that I realized how idle his

  life is," she remarked. "At home all the men have something to do,

  running their plantations, or getting elected to some office. But

  Douglas never does anything that I can possibly think is useful."

  His fortune was invested in New York City real-estate, she went on

  to explain. There was an office, with a small army of clerks and

  agents to attend to it--a machine which had been built up and handed

  on to him by his ancestors. It sufficed if he dropped in for an hour

  or two once a week when he was in the city, and signed a batch of

  documents now and then when he was away. His life was spent in the

  company of people whom the social system had similarly deprived of

  duties; and they had, by generations of experiment, built up for

  themselves a new set of duties, a life which was wholly without

  relationship to reality. Into this unreal existence Sylvia had

  married, and it was like a current sweeping her in its course. So

  long as she went with it, all was well; but let her try to catch

  hold of something and stop, and it would tear her loose and almost

  strangle her.

  As time went on, she gave me strange glimpses into this world. Her

  husband did not seem really to enjoy its life. As Sylvia put it, "He

  takes it for granted that he has to do all the proper things that

  the proper people do. He hates to be conspicuous, he says. I point

  out to him that the proper things are nearly always conspicuous, but

  he replies that to fail to do them would be even more conspicuous."

  It took me a long time to get really acquainted with Sylvia, because

  of the extent to which this world was clamouring for her. I used to

  drop in when she 'phoned me she had half an hour. I would find her

  dressing for something, and she would send her maid away, and we

  would talk until she would be late for some function; and that might

  be a serious matter, because somebody would feel slighted. She was

  always "on pins and needles" over such questions of precedent; it

  seemed as if everybody in her world must be watching everybody else.

  There was a whole elaborate science of how to treat the people you

  met, so that they would not feel slighted--or so that they would

  feel slighted, according to circumstances.

  To the enjoyment of such a life it was essential that the person

  should believe in it. Douglas van Tuiver did believe in it; it was

  his religion, the only one he had. (Churchman as he was, his church

  was a part of the social routine.) He was proud of Sylvia, and

  apparently satisfied when he could take her at his side; and Sylvia

  went, because she was his wife, and that was what wives were for.

  She had tried her best to be happy; she had told herself that she

  _was_ happy yet all the time realizing that a woman who is really

  happy does not have to tell herself.

  Earlier in life she had quaffed and enjoyed the wine of applause. I

  recollect vividly her telling me of the lure her beauty had been to

  her--the most terrible temptation that could come to a woman. "I

  walk into a brilliant room, and I feel the thrill of admiration that

  goes through the crowd. I have a sudden sense of my own physical

  perfection--a glow all over me! I draw a deep breath--I feel a surge

  of exaltation. I say, 'I am victorious--I can command! I have this

  supreme crown of womanly grace--I am all-powerful with it--the world

  is mine!'"

  As she spoke the rapture was in her voice, and I looked at her--and

  yes, she was beautiful! The supreme crown was hers!

  "I see other beautiful women," she went on--and swift anger came

  into her voice. "I see what they are doing with this power!

  Gratifying their vanity--turning men into slaves of their whim!

  Squandering money upon empty pleasures--and with the dreadful plague

  of poverty spreading in the world! I used to go to my father, 'Oh,

  papa, why must there be so many poor people? Why should we have

  servants--why should they have to wait on me, and I do nothing for

  them?' He would try to explain to me that it was the way of Nature.

  Mamma would tell me it was the will of the Lord--'The poor ye have

  always with you'--'Servants, obey your masters'--and so on. But in

  spite of the Bible texts, I felt guilty. And now I come to Douglas

  with the same plea--and it only makes him angry! He has been to

  college and has a lot of scientific phrases--he tells me it's 'the

  struggle for existence,' 'the elimination of the unfit'--and so on.

  I say to him, 'First we make people unfit, and then we have to

  eliminate them.' He cannot see why I do not accept what learned

  people tell me--why I persist in questioning and suffering."

  She paused, and then added, "It's as if he were afraid I might find

  out something he doesn't want me to! He's made me give him a promise

  that I won't see Mrs. Frothingham again!" And she laughed. "I

  haven't told him about you!"

  I answered, needless to say, that I hoped she would keep th
e secret!

  24. All this time I was busy with my child-labour work. We had an

  important bill before the legislature that session, and I was doing

  what I could to work up sentiment for it. I talked at every

  gathering where I could get a hearing; I wrote letters to

  newspapers; I sent literature to lists of names. I racked my mind

  for new schemes, and naturally, at such times, I could not help

  thinking of Sylvia. How much she could do, if only she would!

  I spared no one, least of all myself, and so it was not easy to

  spare her. The fact that I had met her was the gossip of the office,

  and everybody was waiting for something to happen. "How about Mrs.

  van Tuiver?" my "chief" would ask, at intervals. "If she would

  _only_ go on our press committee" my stenographer would sigh.

  The time came when our bill was in committee, a place of peril for

  bills. I went to Albany to see what could be done. I met half a

  hundred legislators, of whom perhaps half-a-dozen had some human

  interest in my subject; the rest, well, it was discouraging. Where

  was the force that would stir them, make them forget their own

  particular little grafts, and serve the public welfare in defiance

  to hostile interests?

  Where was it? I came back to New York to look for it, and after a

  blue luncheon with the members of our committee, I came away with my

  mind made up--I would sacrifice my Sylvia to this desperate

  emergency.

  I knew just what I had to do. So far she had heard speeches about

  social wrongs, or read books about them; she had never been face to

  face with the reality of them. Now I persuaded her to take a morning

  off, and see some of the sights of the underworld of toil. We

  foreswore the royal car, and likewise the royal furs and velvets;

  she garbed herself in plain appearing dark blue and went down town

  in the Subway like common mortals, visiting paper-box factories and

  flower factories, tenement homes where whole families sat pasting

  toys and gimcracks for fourteen or sixteen hours a day, and still

  could not buy enough food to make full-sized men and women of them.

  She was Dante, and I was Virgil, our inferno was an endless

  procession of tortured faces--faces of women, haggard and mournful,

  faces of little children, starved and stunted, dulled and dumb.

  Several times we stopped to talk with these people--one little

  Jewess girl I knew whose three tiny sisters had been roasted alive

  in a sweatshop fire. This child had jumped from a fourth-story

  window, and been miraculously caught by a fireman. She said that

  some man had started the fire, and been caught, but the police had

  let him get away. So I had to explain to Sylvia that curious

  bye-product (sic) of the profit system known as the "Arson Trust."

  Authorities estimated that incendiarism was responsible for the

  destruction of a quarter of a billion dollars worth of property in

  America every year. So, of course, the business of starting fires

  was a paying one, and the "fire-bug," like the "cadet" and the

  dive-keeper, was a part of the "system." So it was quite a possible

  thing that the man who had burned up this little girl's three

  sisters might have been allowed to escape.

  I happened to say this in the little girl's hearing, and I saw her

  pitiful strained eyes fixed upon Sylvia. Perhaps this lovely,

  soft-voiced lady was a fairy god-mother, come to free her sisters

  from an evil spell and to punish the wicked criminal! I saw Sylvia

  turn her head away, and search for her handkerchief; as we groped

  our way down the dark stairs, she caught my hand, whispering: "Oh,

  my God! my God!"

  It had even more effect than I had intended; not only did she say

  that she would do something--anything that would be of use--but she

  told me as we rode back home that her mind was made up to stop the

  squandering of her husband's money. He had been planning a costume

  ball for a couple of months later, an event which would keep the van

  Tuiver name in condition, and would mean that he and other people

  would spend many hundreds of thousands of dollars. As we rode home

  in the roaring Subway, Sylvia sat beside me, erect and tense, saying

  that if the ball were given, it would be without the presence of the

  hostess.

  I struck while the iron was hot, and got her permission to put her

  name upon our committee list. She said, moreover, that she would get

  some free time, and be more than a mere name to us. What were the

  duties of a member of our committee?

  "First," I said, "to know the facts about child-labour, as you have

  seen them to-day, and second, to help other people to know."

  "And how is that to be done?"

  "Well, for instance, there is that hearing before the legislative

  committee. You remember I suggested that you appear."

  "Yes," she said in a low voice. I could almost hear the words that

  were in her mind: "What would _he_ say?"

  25. Sylvia's name went upon our letter-heads and other literature,

  and almost at once things began to happen. In a day or two there

  came a reporter, saying he had noticed her name. Was it true that

  she had become interested in our work? Would I please give him some

  particulars, as the public would naturally want to know.

  I admitted that Mrs. van Tuiver had joined the committee; she

  approved of our work and desired to further it. That was all. He

  asked: Would she give an interview? And I answered that I was sure

  she would not. Then would I tell something about how she had come to

  be interested in the work? It was a chance to assist our propaganda,

  added the reporter, diplomatically.

  I retired to another room, and got Sylvia upon the 'phone, "The time

  has come for you to take the plunge," I said.

  "Oh, but I don't want to be in the papers!" she cried "Surely, you

  wouldn't advise it!"

  "I don't see how you can avoid having something appear. Your name is

  given out, and if the man can't get anything else, he'll take our

  literature, and write up your doings out of his imagination."

  "And they'll print my picture with it!" she exclaimed. I could not

  help laughing. "It's quite possible."

  "Oh, what will my husband do? He'll say 'I told you so!'"

  It is a hard thing to have one's husband say that, as I knew by

  bitter experience. But I did not think that reason enough for giving

  up.

  "Let me have time to think it over," said Sylvia. "Get him to wait

  till to-morrow, and meantime I can see you."

  So it was arranged. I think I told Sylvia the truth when I said that

  I had never before heard of a committee member who was unwilling to

  have his purposes discussed in the newspapers. To influence

  newspapers was one of the main purposes of committees, and I did not

  see how she could expect either editors or readers to take any other

  view.

  "Let me tell the man about your trip down town," I suggested, "then

  I can go on to discuss the bill and how it bears on the evils you

  saw. Such a statement can't possibly do you harm."
r />
  She consented, but with the understanding that she was not to be

  quoted directly. "And don't let them make me picturesque!" she

  exclaimed. "That's what my husband seems most to dread."

  I wondered if he didn't think she was picturesque, when she sat in a

  splendid, shining coach, and took part in a public parade through

  Central Park. But I did not say this. I went off, and swore my

  reporter to abstain from the "human touch," and he promised and kept

  his word. There appeared next morning a dignified "write-up" of Mrs.

  Douglas van Tuiver's interest in child-labour reform. Quoting me, it

  described some of the places she had visited, and some of the sights

  which had shocked her; it went on to tell about our committee and

  its work, the status of our bill in the legislature, the need of

  activity on the part of our friends if the measure was to be forced

  through at this session. It was a splendid "boost" for our work, and

  everyone in the office was in raptures over it. The social

  revolution was at hand! thought my young stenographer.

  But the trouble with this business of publicity is that, however

  carefully you control your interviewer, you cannot control the

  others who use his material. The "afternoon men" came round for more

  details, and they made it clear that it was personal details they

  wanted. And when I side-stepped their questions, they went off and

  made up answers to suit themselves, and printed Sylvia's pictures,

  together with photographs of child-workers taken from our pamphlets.

  I called Sylvia up while she was dressing for dinner, to explain

  that I was not responsible for any of this picturesqueness. "Oh,

  perhaps I am to blame myself!" she exclaimed. "I think I interviewed

  a reporter."

  "How do you mean?"

  "A woman sent up her card--she told the footman she was a friend of

  mine. And I thought--I couldn't be sure if I'd met her--so I went

  and saw her. She said she'd met me at Mrs. Harold Cliveden's, and

  she began to talk to me about child-labour, and this and that plan

  she had, and what did I think of them, and suddenly it flashed over

  me: 'Maybe this is a reporter playing a trick on me!'"

  I hurried out before breakfast next morning and got all the papers,

  to see what this enterprising lady had done. There was nothing, so I

  reflected that probably she had been a "Sunday" lady.

  But then, when I reached my office, the 'phone rang, and I heard the

  voice of Sylvia: "Mary, something perfectly dreadful has happened!"

  "What?" I cried.

  "I can't tell you over the 'phone, but a certain person is furiously

  angry. Can I see you if I come down right away?"

  26. Such terrors as these were unguessed by me in the days of my

  obscurity. Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown, uneasy also,

  lies the wife of that head, and the best friend of the wife. I

  dismissed my stenographer, and spent ten or fifteen restless minutes

  until Sylvia appeared.

  Her story was quickly told. A couple of hours ago the acting-manager

  of Mr. van Tuiver's office had telephoned to ask if he might call

  upon a matter of importance. He had come. Naturally, he had the most

  extreme reluctance to say anything which might seem to criticise the

  activities of Mr. van Tuiver's wife, but there was something in the

  account in the newspapers which should be brought to her husband's

  attention. The articles gave the names and locations of a number of

  firms in whose factories it was alleged that Mrs. van Tuiver had

  found unsatisfactory conditions, and it happened that two of these

  firms were located in premises which belonged to the van Tuiver

  estates!

  A story coming very close to melodrama, I perceived. I sat dismayed

  at what I had done. "Of course, dear girl," I said, at last, "you

  understand that I had no idea who owned these buildings."

  "Oh, don't say that!" exclaimed Sylvia. "I am the one who should