Page 3 of A Study in Scarlet

6. Geology. -- Practical, but limited.

  Tells at a glance different soils

  from each other. After walks has

  shown me splashes upon his trousers,

  and told me by their colour and

  consistence in what part of London

  he had received them.

  7. Chemistry. -- Profound.

  8. Anatomy. -- Accurate, but unsystematic.

  9. Sensational Literature. -- Immense. He appears

  to know every detail of every horror

  perpetrated in the century.

  10. Plays the violin well.

  11. Is an expert singlestick player, boxer, and swordsman.

  12. Has a good practical knowledge of British law.

  When I had got so far in my list I threw it into the fire in

  despair. "If I can only find what the fellow is driving at

  by reconciling all these accomplishments, and discovering a

  calling which needs them all," I said to myself, "I may as

  well give up the attempt at once."

  I see that I have alluded above to his powers upon the violin.

  These were very remarkable, but as eccentric as all his other

  accomplishments. That he could play pieces, and difficult pieces,

  I knew well, because at my request he has played me some of

  Mendelssohn's Lieder, and other favourites.

  When left to himself, however, he would seldom produce any

  music or attempt any recognized air. Leaning back in his

  arm-chair of an evening, he would close his eyes and scrape

  carelessly at the fiddle which was thrown across his knee.

  Sometimes the chords were sonorous and melancholy.

  Occasionally they were fantastic and cheerful. Clearly they

  reflected the thoughts which possessed him, but whether the

  music aided those thoughts, or whether the playing was simply

  the result of a whim or fancy was more than I could determine.

  I might have rebelled against these exasperating solos had it

  not been that he usually terminated them by playing in quick

  succession a whole series of my favourite airs as a slight

  compensation for the trial upon my patience.

  During the first week or so we had no callers, and I had

  begun to think that my companion was as friendless a man as

  I was myself. Presently, however, I found that he had many

  acquaintances, and those in the most different classes of

  society. There was one little sallow rat-faced, dark-eyed

  fellow who was introduced to me as Mr. Lestrade, and who came

  three or four times in a single week. One morning a young

  girl called, fashionably dressed, and stayed for half an hour

  or more. The same afternoon brought a grey-headed, seedy

  visitor, looking like a Jew pedlar, who appeared to me to be

  much excited, and who was closely followed by a slip-shod

  elderly woman. On another occasion an old white-haired

  gentleman had an interview with my companion; and on another

  a railway porter in his velveteen uniform. When any of these

  nondescript individuals put in an appearance, Sherlock Holmes

  used to beg for the use of the sitting-room, and I would

  retire to my bed-room. He always apologized to me for

  putting me to this inconvenience. "I have to use this room

  as a place of business," he said, "and these people are my

  clients." Again I had an opportunity of asking him a point

  blank question, and again my delicacy prevented me from

  forcing another man to confide in me. I imagined at the time

  that he had some strong reason for not alluding to it, but he

  soon dispelled the idea by coming round to the subject of his

  own accord.

  It was upon the 4th of March, as I have good reason to remember,

  that I rose somewhat earlier than usual, and found that Sherlock

  Holmes had not yet finished his breakfast. The landlady had

  become so accustomed to my late habits that my place had not been

  laid nor my coffee prepared. With the unreasonable petulance

  of mankind I rang the bell and gave a curt intimation that I was

  ready. Then I picked up a magazine from the table and attempted

  to while away the time with it, while my companion munched

  silently at his toast. One of the articles had a pencil mark

  at the heading, and I naturally began to run my eye through it.

  Its somewhat ambitious title was "The Book of Life," and it

  attempted to show how much an observant man might learn by an

  accurate and systematic examination of all that came in his

  way. It struck me as being a remarkable mixture of

  shrewdness and of absurdity. The reasoning was close and

  intense, but the deductions appeared to me to be far-fetched

  and exaggerated. The writer claimed by a momentary expression,

  a twitch of a muscle or a glance of an eye, to fathom a man's

  inmost thoughts. Deceit, according to him, was an impossibility

  in the case of one trained to observation and analysis.

  His conclusions were as infallible as so many propositions

  of Euclid. So startling would his results appear to the

  uninitiated that until they learned the processes by which he had

  arrived at them they might well consider him as a necromancer.

  "From a drop of water," said the writer, "a logician could

  infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without

  having seen or heard of one or the other. So all life is

  a great chain, the nature of which is known whenever we are

  shown a single link of it. Like all other arts, the Science

  of Deduction and Analysis is one which can only be acquired

  by long and patient study nor is life long enough to allow

  any mortal to attain the highest possible perfection in it.

  Before turning to those moral and mental aspects of the

  matter which present the greatest difficulties, let the

  enquirer begin by mastering more elementary problems.

  Let him, on meeting a fellow-mortal, learn at a glance to

  distinguish the history of the man, and the trade or

  profession to which he belongs. Puerile as such an exercise

  may seem, it sharpens the faculties of observation, and

  teaches one where to look and what to look for. By a man's

  finger nails, by his coat-sleeve, by his boot, by his trouser

  knees, by the callosities of his forefinger and thumb, by his

  expression, by his shirt cuffs -- by each of these things a

  man's calling is plainly revealed. That all united should

  fail to enlighten the competent enquirer in any case is

  almost inconceivable."

  "What ineffable twaddle!" I cried, slapping the magazine down

  on the table, "I never read such rubbish in my life."

  "What is it?" asked Sherlock Holmes.

  "Why, this article," I said, pointing at it with my egg spoon

  as I sat down to my breakfast. "I see that you have read it

  since you have marked it. I don't deny that it is smartly

  written. It irritates me though. It is evidently the theory

  of some arm-chair lounger who evolves all these neat little
br />
  paradoxes in the seclusion of his own study. It is not

  practical. I should like to see him clapped down in a third

  class carriage on the Underground, and asked to give the

  trades of all his fellow-travellers. I would lay a thousand

  to one against him."

  "You would lose your money," Sherlock Holmes remarked calmly.

  "As for the article I wrote it myself."

  "You!"

  "Yes, I have a turn both for observation and for deduction.

  The theories which I have expressed there, and which appear

  to you to be so chimerical are really extremely practical --

  so practical that I depend upon them for my bread and cheese."

  "And how?" I asked involuntarily.

  "Well, I have a trade of my own. I suppose I am the only one

  in the world. I'm a consulting detective, if you can

  understand what that is. Here in London we have lots of

  Government detectives and lots of private ones. When these

  fellows are at fault they come to me, and I manage to put

  them on the right scent. They lay all the evidence before

  me, and I am generally able, by the help of my knowledge of

  the history of crime, to set them straight. There is a

  strong family resemblance about misdeeds, and if you have all

  the details of a thousand at your finger ends, it is odd if

  you can't unravel the thousand and first. Lestrade is a

  well-known detective. He got himself into a fog recently

  over a forgery case, and that was what brought him here."

  "And these other people?"

  "They are mostly sent on by private inquiry agencies.

  They are all people who are in trouble about something,

  and want a little enlightening. I listen to their story,

  they listen to my comments, and then I pocket my fee."

  "But do you mean to say," I said, "that without leaving your

  room you can unravel some knot which other men can make nothing

  of, although they have seen every detail for themselves?"

  "Quite so. I have a kind of intuition that way.

  Now and again a case turns up which is a little more complex.

  Then I have to bustle about and see things with my own eyes.

  You see I have a lot of special knowledge which I apply to

  the problem, and which facilitates matters wonderfully.

  Those rules of deduction laid down in that article which

  aroused your scorn, are invaluable to me in practical work.

  Observation with me is second nature. You appeared to be

  surprised when I told you, on our first meeting, that you had

  come from Afghanistan."

  "You were told, no doubt."

  "Nothing of the sort. I _knew_ you came from Afghanistan.

  From long habit the train of thoughts ran so swiftly through

  my mind, that I arrived at the conclusion without being

  conscious of intermediate steps. There were such steps,

  however. The train of reasoning ran, `Here is a gentleman of

  a medical type, but with the air of a military man. Clearly

  an army doctor, then. He has just come from the tropics,

  for his face is dark, and that is not the natural tint of his

  skin, for his wrists are fair. He has undergone hardship and

  sickness, as his haggard face says clearly. His left arm has

  been injured. He holds it in a stiff and unnatural manner.

  Where in the tropics could an English army doctor have seen

  much hardship and got his arm wounded? Clearly in Afghanistan.'

  The whole train of thought did not occupy a second. I then

  remarked that you came from Afghanistan, and you were astonished."

  "It is simple enough as you explain it," I said, smiling.

  "You remind me of Edgar Allen Poe's Dupin. I had no idea

  that such individuals did exist outside of stories."

  Sherlock Holmes rose and lit his pipe. "No doubt you think

  that you are complimenting me in comparing me to Dupin,"

  he observed. "Now, in my opinion, Dupin was a very inferior

  fellow. That trick of his of breaking in on his friends'

  thoughts with an apropos remark after a quarter of an hour's

  silence is really very showy and superficial. He had some

  analytical genius, no doubt; but he was by no means such

  a phenomenon as Poe appeared to imagine."

  "Have you read Gaboriau's works?" I asked.

  "Does Lecoq come up to your idea of a detective?"

  Sherlock Holmes sniffed sardonically. "Lecoq was a miserable

  bungler," he said, in an angry voice; "he had only one thing

  to recommend him, and that was his energy. That book made me

  positively ill. The question was how to identify an unknown

  prisoner. I could have done it in twenty-four hours. Lecoq

  took six months or so. It might be made a text-book for

  detectives to teach them what to avoid."

  I felt rather indignant at having two characters whom I had

  admired treated in this cavalier style. I walked over to the

  window, and stood looking out into the busy street.

  "This fellow may be very clever," I said to myself, "but he

  is certainly very conceited."

  "There are no crimes and no criminals in these days," he said,

  querulously. "What is the use of having brains in our

  profession. I know well that I have it in me to make my name

  famous. No man lives or has ever lived who has brought the

  same amount of study and of natural talent to the detection

  of crime which I have done. And what is the result? There

  is no crime to detect, or, at most, some bungling villany

  with a motive so transparent that even a Scotland Yard

  official can see through it."

  I was still annoyed at his bumptious style of conversation.

  I thought it best to change the topic.

  "I wonder what that fellow is looking for?" I asked, pointing

  to a stalwart, plainly-dressed individual who was walking

  slowly down the other side of the street, looking anxiously

  at the numbers. He had a large blue envelope in his hand,

  and was evidently the bearer of a message.

  "You mean the retired sergeant of Marines," said Sherlock Holmes.

  "Brag and bounce!" thought I to myself. "He knows that I

  cannot verify his guess."

  The thought had hardly passed through my mind when the man

  whom we were watching caught sight of the number on our door,

  and ran rapidly across the roadway. We heard a loud knock,

  a deep voice below, and heavy steps ascending the stair.

  "For Mr. Sherlock Holmes," he said, stepping into the room

  and handing my friend the letter.

  Here was an opportunity of taking the conceit out of him.

  He little thought of this when he made that random shot.

  "May I ask, my lad," I said, in the blandest voice,

  "what your trade may be?"

  "Commissionaire, sir," he said, gruffly.

  "Uniform away for repairs."

  "And you were?" I asked, with a slightly malicious glance

  at my companion.

  "A sergeant, sir, Royal Marine Light Infantry, sir.

  No answer? Right, sir."

  He clicked his heels together, raised his hand in a salute,

  and was gone.

  CHAPTER III.

  THE LAURISTON GARDEN MYSTERY {6}

  I CONFESS that I
was considerably startled by this fresh

  proof of the practical nature of my companion's theories.

  My respect for his powers of analysis increased wondrously.

  There still remained some lurking suspicion in my mind,

  however, that the whole thing was a pre-arranged episode,

  intended to dazzle me, though what earthly object he could

  have in taking me in was past my comprehension.

  When I looked at him he had finished reading the note,

  and his eyes had assumed the vacant, lack-lustre expression

  which showed mental abstraction.

  "How in the world did you deduce that?" I asked.

  "Deduce what?" said he, petulantly.

  "Why, that he was a retired sergeant of Marines."

  "I have no time for trifles," he answered, brusquely;

  then with a smile, "Excuse my rudeness. You broke the thread

  of my thoughts; but perhaps it is as well. So you actually were

  not able to see that that man was a sergeant of Marines?"

  "No, indeed."

  "It was easier to know it than to explain why I knew it.

  If you were asked to prove that two and two made four, you might

  find some difficulty, and yet you are quite sure of the fact.

  Even across the street I could see a great blue anchor

  tattooed on the back of the fellow's hand. That smacked of

  the sea. He had a military carriage, however, and regulation

  side whiskers. There we have the marine. He was a man with

  some amount of self-importance and a certain air of command.

  You must have observed the way in which he held his head and

  swung his cane. A steady, respectable, middle-aged man, too,

  on the face of him -- all facts which led me to believe that

  he had been a sergeant."

  "Wonderful!" I ejaculated.

  "Commonplace," said Holmes, though I thought from his

  expression that he was pleased at my evident surprise and

  admiration. "I said just now that there were no criminals.

  It appears that I am wrong -- look at this!" He threw me

  over the note which the commissionaire had brought." {7}

  "Why," I cried, as I cast my eye over it, "this is terrible!"

  "It does seem to be a little out of the common," he remarked,

  calmly. "Would you mind reading it to me aloud?"

  This is the letter which I read to him ----

  "MY DEAR MR. SHERLOCK HOLMES, -- "There has been a bad

  business during the night at 3, Lauriston Gardens, off the

  Brixton Road. Our man on the beat saw a light there about

  two in the morning, and as the house was an empty one,

  suspected that something was amiss. He found the door open,

  and in the front room, which is bare of furniture, discovered

  the body of a gentleman, well dressed, and having cards in

  his pocket bearing the name of `Enoch J. Drebber, Cleveland,

  Ohio, U.S.A.' There had been no robbery, nor is there any

  evidence as to how the man met his death. There are marks

  of blood in the room, but there is no wound upon his person.

  We are at a loss as to how he came into the empty house;

  indeed, the whole affair is a puzzler. If you can come round

  to the house any time before twelve, you will find me there.

  I have left everything _in statu quo_ until I hear from you.

  If you are unable to come I shall give you fuller details,

  and would esteem it a great kindness if you would favour me

  with your opinion. Yours faithfully, "TOBIAS GREGSON."

  "Gregson is the smartest of the Scotland Yarders,"

  my friend remarked; "he and Lestrade are the pick of a bad lot.

  They are both quick and energetic, but conventional -- shockingly

  so. They have their knives into one another, too. They are

  as jealous as a pair of professional beauties. There will be

  some fun over this case if they are both put upon the scent."

  I was amazed at the calm way in which he rippled on.