'I suppose that this note will reach you somewhere about Ada's birthday—the 10th of December, I believe. She will then be six: so that, in about twelve more, I shall have some chance of meeting her; perhaps sooner, if I am obliged to go to England by business or otherwise. Recollect, however, one thing, either in distance or nearness—every day which keeps us asunder should, after so long a period, rather soften our mutual feelings; which must always have one rallying point as long as our child exists, which, I presume, we both hope will be long after either of her parents.

  'The time which has elapsed since the separation has been considerably more than the whole brief period of our union, and the not much longer one of our prior acquaintance. We both made a bitter mistake; but now it is over, and irrevocably so. For at thirty-three on my part, and few years less on yours, though it is no very extended period of life, still it is one when the habits and thought are generally so formed as to admit of no modification; and, as we could not agree when younger, we should with difficulty do so now.

  'I say all this, because I own to you, that notwithstanding everything, I considered our reunion as not impossible for more than a year after the separation; but then I gave up the hope entirely and for ever. But this very impossibility of reunion seems to me at least a reason why, on all the few points of discussion which can arise between us, we should preserve the courtesies of life, and as much of its kindness as people who are never to meet may preserve,—perhaps more easily than nearer connections. For my own part, I am violent, but not malignant; for only fresh provocations can awaken my resentments. To you, who are colder and more concentrated, I would just hint, that you may sometimes mistake the depth of a cold anger for dignity, and a worse feeling for duty. I assure you that I bear you now (whatever I may have done) no resentment whatever. Remember, that, if you have injured me in aught, this forgiveness is something; and that, if I have injured you, it is something more still, if it be true, as the moralists say, that the most offending are the least forgiving.

  'Whether the offence has been solely on my side, or reciprocal, or on yours chiefly, I have ceased to reflect upon any but two things; viz., that you are the mother of my child, and that we shall never meet again. I think, if you also consider the two corresponding points with reference to myself, it will be better for all three.

  'Yours ever,

  'NOEL BYRON.'

  The artless Thomas Moore introduces this letter in the 'Life,' with the remark,—

  'There are few, I should think, of my readers, who will not agree with me in pronouncing, that, if the author of the following letter had not right on his side, he had at least most of those good feelings which are found in general to accompany it.'

  The reader is requested to take notice of the important admission; that the letter was never sent to Lady Byron at all. It was, in fact, never intended for her, but was a nice little dramatic performance, composed simply with the view of acting on the sympathies of Lady Blessington and Byron's numerous female admirers; and the reader will agree with us, we think, that, in this point of view, it was very neatly done, and deserves immortality as a work of high art. For six years he had been plunged into every kind of vice and excess, pleading his shattered domestic joys, and his wife's obdurate heart, as the apology and the impelling cause; filling the air with his shrieks and complaints concerning the slander which pursued him, while he filled letters to his confidential correspondents with records of new mistresses. During all these years, the silence of Lady Byron was unbroken; though Lord Byron not only drew in private on the sympathies of his female admirers, but employed his talents and position as an author in holding her up to contempt and ridicule before thousands of readers. We shall quote at length his side of the story, which he published in the First Canto of 'Don Juan,' that the reader may see how much reason he had for assuming the injured tone which he did in the letter to Lady Byron quoted above. That letter never was sent to her; and the unmanly and indecent caricature of her, and the indelicate exposure of the whole story on his own side, which we are about to quote, were the only communications that could have reached her solitude.

  In the following verses, Lady Byron is represented as Donna Inez, and Lord Byron as Don José; but the incidents and allusions were so very pointed, that nobody for a moment doubted whose history the poet was narrating.

  'His mother was a learned lady, famed

  For every branch of every science known

  In every Christian language ever named,

  With virtues equalled by her wit alone:

  She made the cleverest people quite ashamed;

  And even the good with inward envy groaned,

  Finding themselves so very much exceeded

  In their own way by all the things that she did.

  . . . .

  Save that her duty both to man and God

  Required this conduct; which seemed very odd.

  She kept a journal where his faults were noted,

  And opened certain trunks of books and letters,

  (All which might, if occasion served, be quoted);

  And then she had all Seville for abettors,

  Besides her good old grandmother (who doted):

  The hearers of her case become repeaters,

  Then advocates, inquisitors, and judges,—

  Some for amusement, others for old grudges.

  And then this best and meekest woman bore

  With such serenity her husband's woes!

  Just as the Spartan ladies did of yore,

  Who saw their spouses killed, and nobly chose

  Never to say a word about them more.

  Calmly she heard each calumny that rose,

  And saw his agonies with such sublimity,

  That all the world exclaimed, “What magnanimity!”'

  This is the longest and most elaborate version of his own story that Byron ever published; but he busied himself with many others, projecting at one time a Spanish romance, in which the same story is related in the same transparent manner: but this he was dissuaded from printing. The booksellers, however, made a good speculation in publishing what they called his domestic poems; that is, poems bearing more or less relation to this subject.

  Every person with whom he became acquainted with any degree of intimacy was made familiar with his side of the story. Moore's Biography is from first to last, in its representations, founded upon Byron's communicativeness, and Lady Byron's silence; and the world at last settled down to believing that the account so often repeated, and never contradicted, must be substantially a true one.

  The true history of Lord and Lady Byron has long been perfectly understood in many circles in England; but the facts were of a nature that could not be made public. While there was a young daughter living whose future might be prejudiced by its recital, and while there were other persons on whom the disclosure of the real truth would have been crushing as an avalanche, Lady Byron's only course was the perfect silence in which she took refuge, and those sublime works of charity and mercy to which she consecrated her blighted early life.

  But the time is now come when the truth may be told. All the actors in the scene have disappeared from the stage of mortal existence, and passed, let us have faith to hope, into a world where they would desire to expiate their faults by a late publication of the truth.

  No person in England, we think, would as yet take the responsibility of relating the true history which is to clear Lady Byron's memory; but, by a singular concurrence of circumstances, all the facts of the case, in the most undeniable and authentic form, were at one time placed in the hands of the writer of this sketch, with authority to make such use of them as she should judge best. Had this melancholy history been allowed to sleep, no public use would have been made of them; but the appearance of a popular attack on the character of Lady Byron calls for a vindication, and the true story of her married life will therefore now be related.

  Lord Byron has described in one of his letters the impres
sion left upon his mind by a young person whom he met one evening in society, and who attracted his attention by the simplicity of her dress, and a certain air of singular purity and calmness with which she surveyed the scene around her.

  On inquiry, he was told that this young person was Miss Milbanke, an only child, and one of the largest heiresses in England.

  Lord Byron was fond of idealising his experiences in poetry; and the friends of Lady Byron had no difficulty in recognising the portrait of Lady Byron, as she appeared at this time of her life, in his exquisite description of Aurora Raby:—

  'There was

  Indeed a certain fair and fairy one,

  Of the best class, and better than her class,—

  Aurora Raby, a young star who shone

  O'er life, too sweet an image for such glass;

  A lovely being scarcely formed or moulded;

  A rose with all its sweetest leaves yet folded.

  . . . .

  Early in years, and yet more infantine

  In figure, she had something of sublime

  In eyes which sadly shone as seraphs' shine;

  All youth, but with an aspect beyond time;

  Radiant and grave, as pitying man's decline;

  Mournful, but mournful of another's crime,

  She looked as if she sat by Eden's door,

  And grieved for those who could return no more.

  . . . .

  She gazed upon a world she scarcely knew,

  As seeking not to know it; silent, lone,

  As grows a flower, thus quietly she grew,

  And kept her heart serene within its zone.

  There was awe in the homage which she drew;

  Her spirit seemed as seated on a throne,

  Apart from the surrounding world, and strong

  In its own strength,—most strange in one so young!'

  Some idea of the course which their acquaintance took, and of the manner in which he was piqued into thinking of her, is given in a stanza or two:—

  'The dashing and proud air of Adeline

  Imposed not upon her: she saw her blaze

  Much as she would have seen a glow-worm shine;

  Then turned unto the stars for loftier rays.

  Juan was something she could not divine,

  Being no sibyl in the new world's ways;

  Yet she was nothing dazzled by the meteor,

  Because she did not pin her faith on feature.

  His fame too (for he had that kind of fame

  Which sometimes plays the deuce with womankind,—

  A heterogeneous mass of glorious blame,

  Half virtues and whole vices being combined;

  Faults which attract because they are not tame;

  Follies tricked out so brightly that they blind),—

  These seals upon her wax made no impression,

  Such was her coldness or her self-possession.

  Aurora sat with that indifference

  Which piques a preux chevalier,—as it ought.

  Of all offences, that's the worst offence

  Which seems to hint you are not worth a thought.

  . . . .

  To his gay nothings, nothing was replied,

  Or something which was nothing, as urbanity

  Required. Aurora scarcely looked aside,

  Nor even smiled enough for any vanity.

  The Devil was in the girl! Could it be pride,

  Or modesty, or absence, or inanity?

  . . . .

  Juan was drawn thus into some attentions,

  Slight but select, and just enough to express,

  To females of perspicuous comprehensions,

  That he would rather make them more than less.

  Aurora at the last (so history mentions,

  Though probably much less a fact than guess)

  So far relaxed her thoughts from their sweet prison

  As once or twice to smile, if not to listen.

  . . . .

  But Juan had a sort of winning way,

  A proud humility, if such there be,

  Which showed such deference to what females say,

  As if each charming word were a decree.

  His tact, too, tempered him from grave to gay,

  And taught him when to be reserved or free.

  He had the art of drawing people out,

  Without their seeing what he was about.

  Aurora, who in her indifference,

  Confounded him in common with the crowd

  Of flatterers, though she deemed he had more sense

  Than whispering foplings or than witlings loud,

  Commenced (from such slight things will great commence)

  To feel that flattery which attracts the proud,

  Rather by deference than compliment,

  And wins even by a delicate dissent.

  And then he had good looks: that point was carried

  Nem. con. amongst the women.

  . . . .

  Now, though we know of old that looks deceive,

  And always have done, somehow these good looks,

  Make more impression than the best of books.

  Aurora, who looked more on books than faces,

  Was very young, although so very sage:

  Admiring more Minerva than the Graces,

  Especially upon a printed page.

  But Virtue's self, with all her tightest laces,

  Has not the natural stays of strict old age;

  And Socrates, that model of all duty,

  Owned to a penchant, though discreet for beauty.'

  The presence of this high-minded, thoughtful, unworldly woman is described through two cantos of the wild, rattling 'Don Juan,' in a manner that shows how deeply the poet was capable of being affected by such an appeal to his higher nature.

  For instance, when Don Juan sits silent and thoughtful amid a circle of persons who are talking scandal, the poet says,—

  ''Tis true, he saw Aurora look as though

  She approved his silence: she perhaps mistook

  Its motive for that charity we owe,

  But seldom pay, the absent.

  . . . .

  He gained esteem where it was worth the most;

  And certainly Aurora had renewed

  In him some feelings he had lately lost

  Or hardened,—feelings which, perhaps ideal,

  Are so divine that I must deem them real:—

  The love of higher things and better days;

  The unbounded hope and heavenly ignorance

  Of what is called the world and the world's ways;

  The moments when we gather from a glance

  More joy than from all future pride or praise,

  Which kindled manhood, but can ne'er entrance

  The heart in an existence of its own

  Of which another's bosom is the zone.

  And full of sentiments sublime as billows

  Heaving between this world and worlds beyond,

  Don Juan, when the midnight hour of pillows

  Arrived, retired to his.' . . .

  In all these descriptions of a spiritual unworldly nature acting on the spiritual and unworldly part of his own nature, every one who ever knew Lady Byron intimately must have recognised the model from which he drew, and the experience from which he spoke, even though nothing was further from his mind than to pay this tribute to the woman he had injured, and though before these lines, which showed how truly he knew her real character, had come one stanza of ribald, vulgar caricature, designed as a slight to her:—

  'There was Miss Millpond, smooth as summer's sea,

  That usual paragon, an only daughter,

  Who seemed the cream of equanimity

  'Till skimmed; and then there was some milk and water;

  With a slight shade of blue, too, it might be,

  Beneath the surface: but what did it matter?

  Love's riotous; but marriage should have quiet,

>   And, being consumptive, live on a milk diet.'

  The result of Byron's intimacy with Miss Milbanke and the enkindling of his nobler feelings was an offer of marriage, which she, though at the time deeply interested in him, declined with many expressions of friendship and interest. In fact, she already loved him, but had that doubt of her power to be to him all that a wife should be, which would be likely to arise in a mind so sensitively constituted and so unworldly. They, however, continued a correspondence as friends; on her part, the interest continually increased; on his, the transient rise of better feelings was choked and overgrown by the thorns of base unworthy passions.

  From the height at which he might have been happy as the husband of a noble woman, he fell into the depths of a secret adulterous intrigue with a blood relation, so near in consanguinity, that discovery must have been utter ruin and expulsion from civilised society.

  From henceforth, this damning guilty secret became the ruling force in his life; holding him with a morbid fascination, yet filling him with remorse and anguish, and insane dread of detection. Two years after his refusal by Miss Milbanke, his various friends, seeing that for some cause he was wretched, pressed marriage upon him.

  Marriage has often been represented as the proper goal and terminus of a wild and dissipated career; and it has been supposed to be the appointed mission of good women to receive wandering prodigals, with all the rags and disgraces of their old life upon them, and put rings on their hands, and shoes on their feet, and introduce them, clothed and in their right minds, to an honourable career in society.

  Marriage was, therefore, universally recommended to Lord Byron by his numerous friends and well-wishers; and so he determined to marry, and, in an hour of reckless desperation, sat down and wrote proposals to two ladies. One was declined: the other, which was accepted, was to Miss Milbanke. The world knows well that he had the gift of expression, and will not be surprised that he wrote a very beautiful letter, and that the woman who had already learned to love him fell at once into the snare.